
Research Methodology
Install this when you need an agent to enforce scientific rigor across hypotheses, experiments, literature review, and peer-review prep—not ad-hoc summaries.
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/itallstartedwithaidea/agent-skills --skill research-methodologyWhat is this skill?
- End-to-end scientific lifecycle: hypotheses, controlled experiments, systematic review, data protocols, peer-review prep
- Blocks unfalsifiable hypotheses, missing controls, and underpowered samples before resources are spent
- Practical ops: Boolean literature queries, citation databases, reproducible protocols, IRB-style prep, formatting
- Acts as a research collaborator that challenges conclusions that overreach the data
Adoption & trust: 1 installs on skills.sh; 18 GitHub stars; 3/3 security scanners passed (skills.sh audits); trending (+100% hot-view momentum).
Recommended Skills
Journey fit
Canonical shelf is Idea because methodology choices and literature gaps must be settled before you commit experiments or product claims; the skill’s lifecycle still supports later validate and ship phases. Research subphase matches hypothesis generation, Boolean literature search, and gap-driven study design—the earliest gate where weak methods waste time.
Common Questions / FAQ
Is Research Methodology safe to install?
skills.sh reports 3 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.
SKILL.md
READMESKILL.md - Research Methodology
# Research Methodology Part of [Agent Skills™](https://github.com/itallstartedwithaidea/agent-skills) by [googleadsagent.ai™](https://googleadsagent.ai) ## Description Research Methodology guides the agent through the complete scientific research lifecycle: hypothesis generation from literature gaps, experimental design with proper controls, systematic literature review, data collection protocols, and peer review preparation. The agent functions as a research collaborator that enforces methodological rigor at every stage. Weak methodology invalidates results regardless of how sophisticated the analysis is. This skill prevents common methodological failures: hypotheses that are unfalsifiable, experiments without proper controls, sample sizes without power analysis, and conclusions that overreach the data. The agent asks the hard questions early—before time and resources are committed to a flawed design. The skill also covers the practical aspects of research preparation: structuring literature searches with Boolean queries, maintaining citation databases, designing reproducible experimental protocols, preparing materials for ethical review boards, and formatting submissions to meet journal-specific requirements. It bridges the gap between knowing what good research looks like and executing it systematically. ## Use When - Formulating research questions and hypotheses - Designing experiments with proper controls and sample sizes - Conducting systematic literature reviews - Preparing manuscripts for peer review submission - Writing grant proposals or research proposals - Evaluating the methodology of existing papers ## How It Works ```mermaid graph TD A[Research Question] --> B[Literature Review] B --> C[Identify Knowledge Gap] C --> D[Formulate Hypothesis] D --> E[Design Experiment] E --> F[Power Analysis: Sample Size] F --> G[Define Controls + Variables] G --> H[Ethical Review Preparation] H --> I[Data Collection Protocol] I --> J[Analysis Plan: Pre-registered] J --> K[Execute + Collect Data] K --> L[Analyze per Pre-registered Plan] L --> M[Write Manuscript] M --> N[Peer Review Preparation] ``` The methodology flow is sequential with gates: the hypothesis must be falsifiable before designing the experiment, the experiment must have adequate power before collecting data, and the analysis plan must be pre-registered before execution begins. ## Implementation ```python class ResearchProtocol: def formulate_hypothesis(self, observation: str, literature: list[str]) -> dict: return { "null_hypothesis": "There is no significant difference between...", "alternative_hypothesis": "Treatment X increases Y by at least Z...", "falsifiability": "This hypothesis is falsifiable because...", "variables": { "independent": ["Treatment type (A vs B vs control)"], "dependent": ["Measured outcome Y"], "controlled": ["Age, sex, baseline Z"], "confounding": ["Prior exposure to X"], }, } def power_analysis(self, effect_size: float, alpha: float = 0.05, power: float = 0.80) -> dict: from statsmodels.stats.power import TTestIndPower analysis = TTestIndPower() n = analysis.solve_power(effect_size=effect_size, alpha=alpha, power=power) return { "required_n_per_group": int(np.ceil(n)), "total_n": int(np.ceil(n)) * 2, "effect_size": effect_size, "alpha": alpha, "power": power, "recommendation": f"Recruit {int(np.ceil(n * 1.2))} per group