
Sandbox Hardening
- 56 installs
- 31 repo stars
- Updated April 12, 2026
- itallstartedwithaidea/agent-skills
sandbox-hardening is an agent skill that configures and validates least-privilege sandboxes for AI code execution.
About
sandbox-hardening is an agent skill package for configuring and validating isolated execution environments where AI-generated code runs. Solo builders shipping agent products, internal dev tools, or multi-tenant platforms use it to translate abstract security goals into concrete sandbox profiles: seccomp and AppArmor at the process layer, hardened Docker with dropped capabilities at the container layer, and microVM isolation when trust is low. The workflow walks the agent through permission boundaries, CPU and memory ceilings, filesystem mounts, and monitored egress so a single bad prompt cannot delete host files, leak secrets, or fork-bomb a server. Complexity is advanced because you must match isolation depth to your threat model—development assistants differ from arbitrary user code runners. The skill is procedural security engineering for agentic systems, not a one-click hosted sandbox product.
- Three isolation tiers: process-level (seccomp, AppArmor), container-level (restricted Docker), VM-level (microVMs such a
- Applies least privilege so agents only get permissions required for the task
- Covers resource limits and network segmentation to block unbounded compute and data exfiltration
- Validates sandboxes against prompt-injection and hallucinated destructive commands
- Trust-boundary guidance: internal tools vs multi-tenant vs untrusted code execution
Sandbox Hardening by the numbers
- 56 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +3 installs in the week ending Aug 2, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #1,263 of 2,203 Security skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: LOW risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/itallstartedwithaidea/agent-skills --skill sandbox-hardeningAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 56 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 31 |
| Security audit | 3 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | April 12, 2026 |
| Repository | itallstartedwithaidea/agent-skills ↗ |
What it does
Lock down agent shell and code execution with least-privilege sandboxes before you let generated code touch real machines or customer data.
Who is it for?
Best when you're running Claude Code, Cursor, or custom agents that execute untrusted or semi-trusted generated code on real infrastructure.
Skip if: Skip if you only need static SAST on committed repos with zero runtime agent execution, or beginners and lack Docker or VM ops basics.
When should I use this skill?
Implementing or reviewing sandboxed agent execution, container restrictions, resource limits, or network segmentation for AI-generated code.
What you get
You get a validated isolation profile—process, container, or VM—with limits and network rules appropriate to your trust boundary.
- Sandbox configuration profile with capability and mount rules
- Validation checklist for isolation, limits, and egress
By the numbers
- Three documented isolation levels: process, container, and VM (microVM)
Files
Sandbox Hardening
Part of Agent Skills™ by googleadsagent.ai™
Description
Sandbox Hardening isolates agent execution environments using container sandboxing, permission boundaries, resource limits, and network segmentation. The agent configures and validates sandboxes that prevent AI-generated code from accessing unauthorized resources, consuming unbounded compute, or affecting the host system.
An AI agent with unrestricted shell access is a security liability. Without sandboxing, a prompt injection or hallucinated command could delete files, exfiltrate data, install malware, or consume unbounded resources. Sandbox Hardening applies the principle of least privilege: the agent receives only the permissions it needs, in an isolated environment with strict resource limits and monitored network access.
This skill covers three isolation levels: process-level sandboxing (seccomp, AppArmor), container-level isolation (Docker with restricted capabilities), and VM-level isolation (microVMs like Firecracker). The appropriate level depends on the trust boundary: internal development tools use process-level, multi-tenant platforms use container-level, and untrusted code execution requires VM-level isolation.
Use When
- Running AI-generated code in production or shared environments
- Configuring agent execution environments with least-privilege access
- Deploying multi-tenant AI platforms where users share infrastructure
- Executing untrusted code from user inputs or AI outputs
- Implementing compliance requirements for isolated execution
- Building sandboxed development environments for agents
How It Works
graph TD
A[Agent Task] --> B{Trust Level Assessment}
B -->|Internal Dev| C[Process Sandbox]
B -->|Multi-Tenant| D[Container Sandbox]
B -->|Untrusted Code| E[VM Sandbox]
C --> F[seccomp + AppArmor Profile]
D --> G[Docker: No Root + Read-Only FS]
E --> H[Firecracker microVM]
F --> I[Resource Limits: CPU, Memory, Disk]
G --> I
H --> I
I --> J[Network Policy: Allowlist Only]
J --> K[Filesystem: Scoped Mount]
K --> L[Monitoring: Syscall Audit]
L --> M[Execution within Sandbox]The sandbox is configured before the agent executes any code. Trust level determines the isolation technology, and all levels apply resource limits, network restrictions, and filesystem scoping.
Implementation
# Container sandbox: minimal, non-root, read-only
FROM node:20-slim AS sandbox
RUN groupadd -r agent && useradd -r -g agent -d /workspace agent
WORKDIR /workspace
COPY --chown=agent:agent . .
USER agent# docker-compose sandbox configuration
services:
agent-sandbox:
build: .
read_only: true
tmpfs:
- /tmp:size=100M,noexec
security_opt:
- no-new-privileges:true
- seccomp:seccomp-profile.json
cap_drop:
- ALL
cap_add:
- NET_BIND_SERVICE
deploy:
resources:
limits:
cpus: "2.0"
memory: 512M
pids: 100
reservations:
cpus: "0.5"
memory: 128M
networks:
- sandbox-net
dns:
- 1.1.1.1
networks:
sandbox-net:
driver: bridge
internal: falseimport resource
import os
class ProcessSandbox:
"""Process-level sandboxing for single-tenant development."""
@staticmethod
def apply_limits(
max_memory_mb: int = 256,
max_cpu_seconds: int = 30,
max_file_size_mb: int = 10,
max_open_files: int = 64,
max_processes: int = 10,
):
mb = 1024 * 1024
resource.setrlimit(resource.RLIMIT_AS, (max_memory_mb * mb, max_memory_mb * mb))
resource.setrlimit(resource.RLIMIT_CPU, (max_cpu_seconds, max_cpu_seconds))
resource.setrlimit(resource.RLIMIT_FSIZE, (max_file_size_mb * mb, max_file_size_mb * mb))
resource.setrlimit(resource.RLIMIT_NOFILE, (max_open_files, max_open_files))
resource.setrlimit(resource.RLIMIT_NPROC, (max_processes, max_processes))
@staticmethod
def restrict_filesystem(allowed_dirs: list[str]):
"""Use chroot or bind mounts to restrict filesystem access."""
for d in allowed_dirs:
assert os.path.isabs(d), f"Allowed dirs must be absolute: {d}"
assert os.path.exists(d), f"Allowed dir does not exist: {d}"
@staticmethod
def validate_command(command: str, blocklist: list[str]) -> bool:
"""Check command against blocklist before execution."""
return not any(blocked in command for blocked in blocklist)
COMMAND_BLOCKLIST = [
"rm -rf /", "mkfs", "dd if=", "> /dev/sd",
"curl | sh", "wget | bash", "chmod 777",
"iptables", "mount", "umount",
]Best Practices
- Drop all Linux capabilities and add back only what is strictly required
- Run containers as non-root with
no-new-privilegessecurity option - Set memory, CPU, PID, and file descriptor limits to prevent resource exhaustion
- Use read-only root filesystems with writable tmpfs for scratch space only
- Restrict network access to an explicit allowlist of required endpoints
- Monitor and log all syscalls in the sandbox for post-incident forensic analysis
Platform Compatibility
| Platform | Support | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Cursor | Full | Docker + process sandboxing |
| VS Code | Full | Dev container support |
| Windsurf | Full | Sandbox configuration |
| Claude Code | Full | Container-based isolation |
| Cline | Full | Security boundary config |
| aider | Partial | Process-level only |
Related Skills
- Agent Security Scanning - Vulnerability detection that identifies threats the sandbox must contain
- Secret Protection - Credential isolation that prevents sandboxed agents from accessing secrets outside their scope
- Configuration Management - Infrastructure-as-code patterns for declaratively managing sandbox configurations across environments
Keywords
sandbox container-security isolation least-privilege resource-limits seccomp docker-hardening agent-isolation
---
© 2026 googleadsagent.ai™ | Agent Skills™ | MIT License
Related skills
How it compares
Procedural sandbox design for agents, not a substitute for dependency vulnerability scanning alone.
FAQ
Who is sandbox-hardening for?
Developers and small teams operating agent runtimes who need container, process, or VM isolation before granting shell or code execution.
When should I use sandbox-hardening?
In Ship security before go-live, while building agent-tooling integrations, and in Operate infra when tightening production agent workers or multi-tenant executors.
Is sandbox-hardening safe to install?
The skill guides privileged infra changes; review the Security Audits panel on this Prism page and test changes in non-production environments first.