
Layers User Needs
- 1.6k installs
- 282 repo stars
- Updated May 30, 2026
- jamiemill/layers-skills
layers-user-needs is a product-discovery skill that turns observations into prioritized job stories and opportunity statements for developers and PMs scoping features before build.
About
layers-user-needs is a jamiemill/layers-skills library for eliciting and prioritizing user needs, pains, and desires that feed product strategy. The skill assumes layers-intro is loaded and operates as techniques rather than a rigid script, sitting between messy behavioral observation and deliberate solution decisions. Outputs are opportunities: needs users want to achieve, pains blocking them, and desires shaping motivation, expressed as prioritized job stories surfacing real bets before feature commitment. Developers and PMs invoke layers-user-needs during discovery workshops, interview synthesis, or roadmap framing when assumptions need structure without jumping straight to implementation tickets.
- Converts observations into job stories using JTBD format (Situation → Motivation → Outcome)
- Elicits and distinguishes needs, pains, and desires as distinct opportunity types
- Forces evidence vs assumption tagging on every user need
- Prioritizes opportunities with explicit rationale for product strategy input
- Works with multiple framing methods including Job Stories (default), User Stories, and Top Tasks analysis
Layers User Needs by the numbers
- 1,574 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +129 installs in the week ending Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #375 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: LOW risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/jamiemill/layers-skills --skill layers-user-needsAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 1.6k |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 282 |
| Security audit | 3 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | May 30, 2026 |
| Repository | jamiemill/layers-skills ↗ |
How do you prioritize user needs before building features?
Turn raw observations and assumptions about users into clearly prioritized job stories that surface real opportunities before committing to features.
Who is it for?
Product engineers and PMs synthesizing research into scoped opportunities before solution design.
Skip if: Teams already in implementation sprints with signed requirements and no discovery gap.
When should I use this skill?
Raw user observations or assumptions need translation into prioritized needs and job stories pre-build.
What you get
Prioritized job stories, opportunity statements, and structured needs/pains/desires lists.
- Prioritized job stories
- Needs/pains/desires opportunity lists
Files
/layers-user-needs
Assumes `/layers-intro` has been loaded. This skill is a library of techniques, not a script — see "How to use these skills" there.
User needs are what we think users are trying to achieve, and why — an interpretation built on observed behaviour and domain knowledge, not a direct capture of reality. This layer sits between the messy raw material of observation and the deliberate decisions of the solution space.
The outputs here are opportunities: needs (what users want to achieve), pains (what causes friction), and desires (improvements they'd value). All three are valid — elicit all three.
---
The decisions this layer makes
- Who exactly the users are whose needs we're defining — and in what situation
- What jobs they're trying to do: functional, emotional, and social
- Which needs are grounded in evidence, and which are assumptions
- Which needs matter most, and why
If the needs are already clear and grounded, don't re-elicit them for the sake of it — take them to /layers-product-strategy.
---
Disciplines — what keeps needs honest
- Need, not solution. "When I need a report, I want to export to CSV" is a solution. Push to the underlying need.
- Strip the mechanism. If the "When" clause references your specific solution (your dashboard, your CSM, your weekly email), you're describing the current system, not the need. Re-state it independent of who or what serves it: what's true about the user at the moment they need this? The need follows from the state, not the mechanism.
- The "When" must be picturable. Specific enough to see the moment it happens — triggered by an event, a feeling, a rhythm, or a threshold crossed. Push until it is.
- Elicit emotional and social jobs, not just functional. They're chronically under-articulated even when they're shaping behaviour. Asking explicitly is usually what surfaces them. (Functional → interaction & model; emotional → surface tone/feedback; social → surface, sometimes strategy.)
- Mark confidence: observed / inferred / assumed.
- Workarounds are signal. A need real enough to motivate a spreadsheet or a workaround email is a strong one.
---
Techniques
Job stories are the default; the rest suit particular situations.
| Technique | Use it when |
|---|---|
| Job stories (JTBD) | Default. When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [outcome]. Keeps solutions out; the "When" clause forces specificity. |
| User stories | The team prefers role-based framing or an existing Agile workflow. |
| Top tasks analysis (Gerry McGovern) | Large existing user base — identify which tasks matter most by frequency. Statistical, survey-based. |
| Persona + scenario | Communicating to stakeholders who think in archetypes. Good for alignment; less precise for design. |
| ODI desired outcomes (Ulwick) | Precise, measurable statements — "Minimize [metric] when [context]." Maps directly to opportunity scoring. |
| Surface hidden needs | Prompts to find what's ignored: what users do before/after the moment you focus on; what they wish they didn't have to do; what a workaround currently serves. |
| Rough prioritisation | Order by importance × how poorly currently served. A need that matters and is badly served is a high-value opportunity. Keep it rough — precise scoring is strategy work. |
---
Working with the designer
First settle who the users are and in what situation — not "users" but which type, when. If there's more than one distinct type with different needs, work them separately. Note the source (research, domain knowledge, or assumption); if it's assumption, mark it and plan to validate.
Then work the needs the designer raises through the disciplines above, and probe for hidden ones. Offer the technique that fits — job stories by default, ODI when measurability matters, top tasks when there's a large user base. Don't run a fixed sequence.
Capture only the residue: the prioritised needs with confidence ratings, the unprioritised-but-surfaced ones (so they aren't lost), gaps (probably-real needs not yet grounded), and any contradictions between user types. Keep it to what carries a decision.
These needs are the opportunities for /layers-product-strategy. If they're mostly assumed, consider /layers-observed-behaviour to gather evidence before building strategy on them.
Related skills
How it compares
Use layers-user-needs over generic user-story templates when discovery must separate interpreted needs from premature solution specs.
FAQ
What outputs does layers-user-needs produce?
layers-user-needs produces prioritized opportunities: user needs, pains, desires, and job stories that connect observed behavior to product strategy before solution design.
Does layers-user-needs require other layers skills?
layers-user-needs assumes layers-intro has been loaded first and references shared guidance on how to apply layers techniques as a library rather than a fixed script.
Is Layers User Needs safe to install?
skills.sh reports 3 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.