
Frontend Testing
- 3.2k installs
- 151k repo stars
- Updated August 5, 2026
- langgenius/dify
frontend-testing is an agent skill that generates Vitest and React Testing Library tests for Dify frontend components, hooks, and utilities following web/docs/test.md conventions.
About
frontend-testing is a Codex-oriented Dify skill for generating Vitest and React Testing Library tests for components, hooks, and utilities across the web codebase. It is derived from the authoritative web/docs/test.md and mandates Vitest mock and timer APIs via vi.* instead of ad-hoc jest patterns. The skill triggers on testing, spec files, coverage, Vitest, RTL, unit tests, integration tests, and write or review test requests while excluding backend pytest and Cucumber Playwright E2E under e2e/. Test files use ComponentName.spec.tsx inside sibling __tests__ directories mapped from source paths such as foo/index.tsx to foo/__tests__/index.spec.tsx. Required describe blocks cover Rendering, Props, User Interactions, and Edge Cases with vi.clearAllMocks in beforeEach. External dependencies mock via vi.mock while project components import real modules. Commands run from web/ with pnpm test, watch mode, coverage, and pnpm analyze-component for complexity review. Developers reach for frontend-testing when adding or reviewing Dify frontend tests and need repo-specific conventions rather than generic React Testing Library advice.
- Authoritative source is web/docs/test.md with Vitest vi.* mock and timer APIs required.
- Test files live in sibling __tests__/ folders as ComponentName.spec.tsx beside the source under test.
- Required describe blocks cover Rendering, Props, User Interactions, and Edge Cases with beforeEach mock resets.
- Mocks external dependencies only; project components and Zustand stores use real modules with setState in tests.
- Excludes backend pytest and Cucumber Playwright E2E; commands run from web/ via pnpm test and analyze-component.
Frontend Testing by the numbers
- 3,188 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +84 installs in the week ending Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #308 of 2,153 Testing & QA skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: LOW risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
frontend-testing capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- vitest and rtl test scaffolding for components a · __tests__/ placement and naming conventions · mock versus real import rules for dify modules · pnpm test and analyze component workflow guidanc
- Use cases
- testing · frontend
npx skills add https://github.com/langgenius/dify --skill frontend-testingAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 3.2k |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 151k |
| Security audit | 3 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | August 5, 2026 |
| Repository | langgenius/dify ↗ |
How do I write or review Dify frontend tests that follow project Vitest and RTL conventions instead of generic React testing patterns?
Invoke Dify's frontend-testing skill so your agent follows the project's UI test workflow instead of guessing checklists.
Who is it for?
Developers working in the Dify web monorepo who need agent-guided Vitest and RTL tests aligned with established project rules.
Skip if: Skip for backend pytest tests, Cucumber Playwright E2E under e2e/, or conceptual testing questions without code context.
When should I use this skill?
User writes or reviews Dify frontend tests, spec files, Vitest coverage, or React Testing Library component tests.
What you get
Spec files in __tests__/ folders with Rendering, Props, Interaction, and Edge Case coverage using vi.* mocks and real project components.
- Vitest spec files
- RTL component and hook tests
By the numbers
- Authoritative test conventions sourced from web/docs/test.md
Files
Dify Frontend Testing Skill
This skill enables Codex to generate high-quality, comprehensive frontend tests for the Dify project following established conventions and best practices.
⚠️ Authoritative Source: This skill is derived fromweb/docs/test.md. Use Vitest mock/timer APIs (vi.*).
When to Apply This Skill
Apply this skill when the user:
- Asks to write tests for a component, hook, or utility
- Asks to review existing tests for completeness
- Mentions Vitest, React Testing Library, RTL, or spec files
- Requests test coverage improvement
- Uses
pnpm analyze-componentoutput as context - Mentions testing, unit tests, or integration tests for frontend code
- Wants to understand testing patterns in the Dify codebase
Do NOT apply when:
- User is asking about backend/API tests (Python/pytest)
- User is asking about E2E tests (Cucumber + Playwright under
e2e/) - User is only asking conceptual questions without code context
Quick Reference
Key Commands
Run these commands from web/. From the repository root, prefix them with pnpm -C web.
# Run all tests
pnpm test
# Watch mode
pnpm test --watch
# Run specific file
pnpm test path/to/file.spec.tsx
# Generate coverage report
pnpm test --coverage
# Analyze component complexity
pnpm analyze-component <path>
# Review existing test
pnpm analyze-component <path> --reviewFile Naming
- Test files:
ComponentName.spec.tsxinside a same-level__tests__/directory - Placement rule: Component, hook, and utility tests must live in a sibling
__tests__/folder at the same level as the source under test. For example,foo/index.tsxmaps tofoo/__tests__/index.spec.tsx, andfoo/bar.tsmaps tofoo/__tests__/bar.spec.ts. - Integration tests:
web/__tests__/directory
Test Structure Template
import { render, screen, fireEvent, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'
import Component from './index'
// ✅ Import real project components (DO NOT mock these)
// import Loading from '@/app/components/base/loading'
// import { ChildComponent } from './child-component'
// ✅ Mock external dependencies only
vi.mock('@/service/api')
vi.mock('next/navigation', () => ({
useRouter: () => ({ push: vi.fn() }),
usePathname: () => '/test',
}))
// ✅ Zustand stores: Use real stores (auto-mocked globally)
// Set test state with: useAppStore.setState({ ... })
// Shared state for mocks (if needed)
let mockSharedState = false
describe('ComponentName', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks() // ✅ Reset mocks BEFORE each test
mockSharedState = false // ✅ Reset shared state
})
// Rendering tests (REQUIRED)
describe('Rendering', () => {
it('should render without crashing', () => {
// Arrange
const props = { title: 'Test' }
// Act
render(<Component {...props} />)
// Assert
expect(screen.getByText('Test')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
// Props tests (REQUIRED)
describe('Props', () => {
it('should apply custom className', () => {
render(<Component className="custom" />)
expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toHaveClass('custom')
})
})
// User Interactions
describe('User Interactions', () => {
it('should handle click events', () => {
const handleClick = vi.fn()
render(<Component onClick={handleClick} />)
fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})
})
// Edge Cases (REQUIRED)
describe('Edge Cases', () => {
it('should handle null data', () => {
render(<Component data={null} />)
expect(screen.getByText(/no data/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should handle empty array', () => {
render(<Component items={[]} />)
expect(screen.getByText(/empty/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
})Testing Workflow (CRITICAL)
⚠️ Incremental Approach Required
NEVER generate all test files at once. For complex components or multi-file directories:
1. Analyze & Plan: List all files, order by complexity (simple → complex) 1. Process ONE at a time: Write test → Run test → Fix if needed → Next 1. Verify before proceeding: Do NOT continue to next file until current passes
For each file:
┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Write test │
│ 2. Run: pnpm test <file>.spec.tsx │
│ 3. PASS? → Mark complete, next file │
│ FAIL? → Fix first, then continue │
└────────────────────────────────────────┘Complexity-Based Order
Process in this order for multi-file testing:
1. 🟢 Utility functions (simplest) 1. 🟢 Custom hooks 1. 🟡 Simple components (presentational) 1. 🟡 Medium components (state, effects) 1. 🔴 Complex components (API, routing) 1. 🔴 Integration tests (index files - last)
When to Refactor First
- Complexity > 50: Break into smaller pieces before testing
- 500+ lines: Consider splitting before testing
- Many dependencies: Extract logic into hooks first
📖 See references/workflow.md for complete workflow details and todo list format.Testing Strategy
Path-Level Testing (Directory Testing)
When assigned to test a directory/path, test ALL content within that path:
- Test all components, hooks, utilities in the directory (not just
indexfile) - Use incremental approach: one file at a time, verify each before proceeding
- Goal: 100% coverage of ALL files in the directory
Integration Testing First
Prefer integration testing when writing tests for a directory:
- ✅ Import real project components directly (including base components and siblings)
- ✅ Only mock: API services (
@/service/*),next/navigation, complex context providers - ❌ DO NOT mock base components (
@/app/components/base/*) or dify-ui primitives (@langgenius/dify-ui/*) - ❌ DO NOT mock sibling/child components in the same directory
See Test Structure Template for correct import/mock patterns.
nuqs Query State Testing (Required for URL State Hooks)
When a component or hook uses useQueryState / useQueryStates:
- ✅ Use
NuqsTestingAdapter(prefer shared helpers inweb/test/nuqs-testing.tsx) - ✅ Assert URL synchronization via
onUrlUpdate(searchParams,options.history) - ✅ For custom parsers (
createParser), keepparseandserializebijective and add round-trip edge cases (%2F,%25, spaces, legacy encoded values) - ✅ Verify default-clearing behavior (default values should be removed from URL when applicable)
- ⚠️ Only mock
nuqsdirectly when URL behavior is explicitly out of scope for the test
Core Principles
1. AAA Pattern (Arrange-Act-Assert)
Every test should clearly separate:
- Arrange: Setup test data and render component
- Act: Perform user actions
- Assert: Verify expected outcomes
2. Black-Box Testing
- Test observable behavior, not implementation details
- Use semantic queries (
getByRolewith accessiblename,getByLabelText,getByPlaceholderText,getByText, and scopedwithin(...)) - Treat
getByTestIdas a last resort. If a control cannot be found by role/name, label, landmark, or dialog scope, fix the component accessibility first instead of adding or relying ondata-testid. - Remove production
data-testidattributes when semantic selectors can cover the behavior. Keep them only for non-visual mocked boundaries, editor/browser shims such as Monaco, canvas/chart output, or third-party widgets with no accessible DOM in the test environment. - Do not assert decorative icons by test id. Assert the named control that contains them, or mark decorative icons
aria-hidden. - Avoid testing internal state directly
- Prefer pattern matching over hardcoded strings in assertions:
// ❌ Avoid: hardcoded text assertions
expect(screen.getByText('Loading...')).toBeInTheDocument()
// ✅ Better: role-based queries
expect(screen.getByRole('status')).toBeInTheDocument()
// ✅ Better: pattern matching
expect(screen.getByText(/loading/i)).toBeInTheDocument()3. Single Behavior Per Test
Each test verifies ONE user-observable behavior:
// ✅ Good: One behavior
it('should disable button when loading', () => {
render(<Button loading />)
expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
})
// ❌ Bad: Multiple behaviors
it('should handle loading state', () => {
render(<Button loading />)
expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
expect(screen.getByText('Loading...')).toBeInTheDocument()
expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toHaveClass('loading')
})4. Semantic Naming
Use should <behavior> when <condition>:
it('should show error message when validation fails')
it('should call onSubmit when form is valid')
it('should disable input when isReadOnly is true')Required Test Scenarios
Always Required (All Components)
1. Rendering: Component renders without crashing 1. Props: Required props, optional props, default values 1. Edge Cases: null, undefined, empty values, boundary conditions
Conditional (When Present)
| Feature | Test Focus |
|---|---|
useState | Initial state, transitions, cleanup |
useEffect | Execution, dependencies, cleanup |
| Event handlers | All onClick, onChange, onSubmit, keyboard |
| API calls | Loading, success, error states |
| Routing | Navigation, params, query strings |
useCallback/useMemo | Referential equality |
| Context | Provider values, consumer behavior |
| Forms | Validation, submission, error display |
Coverage Goals (Per File)
For each test file generated, aim for:
- ✅ 100% function coverage
- ✅ 100% statement coverage
- ✅ >95% branch coverage
- ✅ >95% line coverage
Note: For multi-file directories, process one file at a time with full coverage each. See references/workflow.md.Detailed Guides
For more detailed information, refer to:
references/workflow.md- Incremental testing workflow (MUST READ for multi-file testing)references/mocking.md- Mock patterns, Zustand store testing, and best practicesreferences/async-testing.md- Async operations and API callsreferences/domain-components.md- Workflow, Dataset, Configuration testingreferences/common-patterns.md- Frequently used testing patternsreferences/checklist.md- Test generation checklist and validation steps
Authoritative References
Primary Specification (MUST follow)
- `web/docs/test.md` - The canonical testing specification. This skill is derived from this document.
Reference Examples in Codebase
web/utils/classnames.spec.ts- Utility function testsweb/app/components/base/radio/__tests__/index.spec.tsx- Component testsweb/__mocks__/provider-context.ts- Mock factory example
Project Configuration
web/vite.config.ts- Vite/Vitest configurationweb/vitest.setup.ts- Test environment setupweb/scripts/analyze-component.js- Component analysis tool- Modules are not mocked automatically. Global mocks live in
web/vitest.setup.ts(for examplereact-i18next,next/image); mock other modules likekyormimelocally in test files.
/**
* Test Template for React Components
*
* WHY THIS STRUCTURE?
* - Organized sections make tests easy to navigate and maintain
* - Mocks at top ensure consistent test isolation
* - Factory functions reduce duplication and improve readability
* - describe blocks group related scenarios for better debugging
*
* INSTRUCTIONS:
* 1. Replace `ComponentName` with your component name
* 2. Update import path
* 3. Add/remove test sections based on component features (use analyze-component)
* 4. Follow AAA pattern: Arrange → Act → Assert
*
* RUN FIRST: pnpm analyze-component <path> to identify required test scenarios
*/
import { render, screen, fireEvent, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'
// import ComponentName from './index'
// ============================================================================
// Mocks
// ============================================================================
// WHY: Mocks must be hoisted to top of file (Vitest requirement).
// They run BEFORE imports, so keep them before component imports.
// i18n (automatically mocked)
// WHY: Global mock in web/vitest.setup.ts is auto-loaded by Vitest setup
// The global mock provides: useTranslation, Trans, useMixedTranslation, useGetLanguage
// No explicit mock needed for most tests
//
// Override only if custom translations are required:
// import { createReactI18nextMock } from '@/test/i18n-mock'
// vi.mock('react-i18next', () => createReactI18nextMock({
// 'my.custom.key': 'Custom Translation',
// 'button.save': 'Save',
// }))
// Router (if component uses useRouter, usePathname, useSearchParams)
// WHY: Isolates tests from Next.js routing, enables testing navigation behavior
// const mockPush = vi.fn()
// vi.mock('@/next/navigation', () => ({
// useRouter: () => ({ push: mockPush }),
// usePathname: () => '/test-path',
// }))
// API services (if component fetches data)
// WHY: Prevents real network calls, enables testing all states (loading/success/error)
// vi.mock('@/service/api')
// import * as api from '@/service/api'
// const mockedApi = vi.mocked(api)
// Shared mock state (for portal/dropdown components)
// WHY: Portal components like PortalToFollowElem need shared state between
// parent and child mocks to correctly simulate open/close behavior
// let mockOpenState = false
// ============================================================================
// Test Data Factories
// ============================================================================
// WHY FACTORIES?
// - Avoid hard-coded test data scattered across tests
// - Easy to create variations with overrides
// - Type-safe when using actual types from source
// - Single source of truth for default test values
// const createMockProps = (overrides = {}) => ({
// // Default props that make component render successfully
// ...overrides,
// })
// const createMockItem = (overrides = {}) => ({
// id: 'item-1',
// name: 'Test Item',
// ...overrides,
// })
// ============================================================================
// Test Helpers
// ============================================================================
// const renderComponent = (props = {}) => {
// return render(<ComponentName {...createMockProps(props)} />)
// }
// ============================================================================
// Tests
// ============================================================================
describe('ComponentName', () => {
// WHY beforeEach with clearAllMocks?
// - Ensures each test starts with clean slate
// - Prevents mock call history from leaking between tests
// - MUST be beforeEach (not afterEach) to reset BEFORE assertions like toHaveBeenCalledTimes
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
// Reset shared mock state if used (CRITICAL for portal/dropdown tests)
// mockOpenState = false
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Rendering Tests (REQUIRED - Every component MUST have these)
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// WHY: Catches import errors, missing providers, and basic render issues
describe('Rendering', () => {
it('should render without crashing', () => {
// Arrange - Setup data and mocks
// const props = createMockProps()
// Act - Render the component
// render(<ComponentName {...props} />)
// Assert - Verify expected output
// Prefer getByRole for accessibility; it's what users "see"
// expect(screen.getByRole('...')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should render with default props', () => {
// WHY: Verifies component works without optional props
// render(<ComponentName />)
// expect(screen.getByText('...')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Props Tests (REQUIRED - Every component MUST test prop behavior)
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// WHY: Props are the component's API contract. Test them thoroughly.
describe('Props', () => {
it('should apply custom className', () => {
// WHY: Common pattern in Dify - components should merge custom classes
// render(<ComponentName className="custom-class" />)
// expect(screen.getByTestId('component')).toHaveClass('custom-class')
})
it('should use default values for optional props', () => {
// WHY: Verifies TypeScript defaults work at runtime
// render(<ComponentName />)
// expect(screen.getByRole('...')).toHaveAttribute('...', 'default-value')
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// User Interactions (if component has event handlers - on*, handle*)
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// WHY: Event handlers are core functionality. Test from user's perspective.
describe('User Interactions', () => {
it('should call onClick when clicked', async () => {
// WHY userEvent over fireEvent?
// - userEvent simulates real user behavior (focus, hover, then click)
// - fireEvent is lower-level, doesn't trigger all browser events
// const user = userEvent.setup()
// const handleClick = vi.fn()
// render(<ComponentName onClick={handleClick} />)
//
// await user.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
//
// expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})
it('should call onChange when value changes', async () => {
// const user = userEvent.setup()
// const handleChange = vi.fn()
// render(<ComponentName onChange={handleChange} />)
//
// await user.type(screen.getByRole('textbox'), 'new value')
//
// expect(handleChange).toHaveBeenCalled()
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// State Management (if component uses useState/useReducer)
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// WHY: Test state through observable UI changes, not internal state values
describe('State Management', () => {
it('should update state on interaction', async () => {
// WHY test via UI, not state?
// - State is implementation detail; UI is what users see
// - If UI works correctly, state must be correct
// const user = userEvent.setup()
// render(<ComponentName />)
//
// // Initial state - verify what user sees
// expect(screen.getByText('Initial')).toBeInTheDocument()
//
// // Trigger state change via user action
// await user.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
//
// // New state - verify UI updated
// expect(screen.getByText('Updated')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Async Operations (if component fetches data - useQuery, fetch)
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// WHY: Async operations have 3 states users experience: loading, success, error
describe('Async Operations', () => {
it('should show loading state', () => {
// WHY never-resolving promise?
// - Keeps component in loading state for assertion
// - Alternative: use fake timers
// mockedApi.fetchData.mockImplementation(() => new Promise(() => {}))
// render(<ComponentName />)
//
// expect(screen.getByText(/loading/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should show data on success', async () => {
// WHY waitFor?
// - Component updates asynchronously after fetch resolves
// - waitFor retries assertion until it passes or times out
// mockedApi.fetchData.mockResolvedValue({ items: ['Item 1'] })
// render(<ComponentName />)
//
// await waitFor(() => {
// expect(screen.getByText('Item 1')).toBeInTheDocument()
// })
})
it('should show error on failure', async () => {
// mockedApi.fetchData.mockRejectedValue(new Error('Network error'))
// render(<ComponentName />)
//
// await waitFor(() => {
// expect(screen.getByText(/error/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
// })
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Edge Cases (REQUIRED - Every component MUST handle edge cases)
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// WHY: Real-world data is messy. Components must handle:
// - Null/undefined from API failures or optional fields
// - Empty arrays/strings from user clearing data
// - Boundary values (0, MAX_INT, special characters)
describe('Edge Cases', () => {
it('should handle null value', () => {
// WHY test null specifically?
// - API might return null for missing data
// - Prevents "Cannot read property of null" in production
// render(<ComponentName value={null} />)
// expect(screen.getByText(/no data/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should handle undefined value', () => {
// WHY test undefined separately from null?
// - TypeScript treats them differently
// - Optional props are undefined, not null
// render(<ComponentName value={undefined} />)
// expect(screen.getByText(/no data/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should handle empty array', () => {
// WHY: Empty state often needs special UI (e.g., "No items yet")
// render(<ComponentName items={[]} />)
// expect(screen.getByText(/empty/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should handle empty string', () => {
// WHY: Empty strings are truthy in JS but visually empty
// render(<ComponentName text="" />)
// expect(screen.getByText(/placeholder/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Accessibility (optional but recommended for Dify's enterprise users)
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// WHY: Dify has enterprise customers who may require accessibility compliance
describe('Accessibility', () => {
it('should have accessible name', () => {
// WHY getByRole with name?
// - Tests that screen readers can identify the element
// - Enforces proper labeling practices
// render(<ComponentName label="Test Label" />)
// expect(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /test label/i })).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should support keyboard navigation', async () => {
// WHY: Some users can't use a mouse
// const user = userEvent.setup()
// render(<ComponentName />)
//
// await user.tab()
// expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toHaveFocus()
})
})
})
/**
* Test Template for Custom Hooks
*
* Instructions:
* 1. Replace `useHookName` with your hook name
* 2. Update import path
* 3. Add/remove test sections based on hook features
*/
import { renderHook, act, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'
// import { useHookName } from './use-hook-name'
// ============================================================================
// Mocks
// ============================================================================
// API services (if hook fetches data)
// vi.mock('@/service/api')
// import * as api from '@/service/api'
// const mockedApi = vi.mocked(api)
// ============================================================================
// Test Helpers
// ============================================================================
// Wrapper for hooks that need context
// const createWrapper = (contextValue = {}) => {
// return ({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) => (
// <SomeContext.Provider value={contextValue}>
// {children}
// </SomeContext.Provider>
// )
// }
// ============================================================================
// Tests
// ============================================================================
describe('useHookName', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Initial State
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
describe('Initial State', () => {
it('should return initial state', () => {
// const { result } = renderHook(() => useHookName())
//
// expect(result.current.value).toBe(initialValue)
// expect(result.current.isLoading).toBe(false)
})
it('should accept initial value from props', () => {
// const { result } = renderHook(() => useHookName({ initialValue: 'custom' }))
//
// expect(result.current.value).toBe('custom')
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// State Updates
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
describe('State Updates', () => {
it('should update value when setValue is called', () => {
// const { result } = renderHook(() => useHookName())
//
// act(() => {
// result.current.setValue('new value')
// })
//
// expect(result.current.value).toBe('new value')
})
it('should reset to initial value', () => {
// const { result } = renderHook(() => useHookName({ initialValue: 'initial' }))
//
// act(() => {
// result.current.setValue('changed')
// })
// expect(result.current.value).toBe('changed')
//
// act(() => {
// result.current.reset()
// })
// expect(result.current.value).toBe('initial')
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Async Operations
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
describe('Async Operations', () => {
it('should fetch data on mount', async () => {
// mockedApi.fetchData.mockResolvedValue({ data: 'test' })
//
// const { result } = renderHook(() => useHookName())
//
// // Initially loading
// expect(result.current.isLoading).toBe(true)
//
// // Wait for data
// await waitFor(() => {
// expect(result.current.isLoading).toBe(false)
// })
//
// expect(result.current.data).toEqual({ data: 'test' })
})
it('should handle fetch error', async () => {
// mockedApi.fetchData.mockRejectedValue(new Error('Network error'))
//
// const { result } = renderHook(() => useHookName())
//
// await waitFor(() => {
// expect(result.current.error).toBeTruthy()
// })
//
// expect(result.current.error?.message).toBe('Network error')
})
it('should refetch when dependency changes', async () => {
// mockedApi.fetchData.mockResolvedValue({ data: 'test' })
//
// const { result, rerender } = renderHook(
// ({ id }) => useHookName(id),
// { initialProps: { id: '1' } }
// )
//
// await waitFor(() => {
// expect(mockedApi.fetchData).toHaveBeenCalledWith('1')
// })
//
// rerender({ id: '2' })
//
// await waitFor(() => {
// expect(mockedApi.fetchData).toHaveBeenCalledWith('2')
// })
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Side Effects
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
describe('Side Effects', () => {
it('should call callback when value changes', () => {
// const callback = vi.fn()
// const { result } = renderHook(() => useHookName({ onChange: callback }))
//
// act(() => {
// result.current.setValue('new value')
// })
//
// expect(callback).toHaveBeenCalledWith('new value')
})
it('should cleanup on unmount', () => {
// const cleanup = vi.fn()
// vi.spyOn(window, 'addEventListener')
// vi.spyOn(window, 'removeEventListener')
//
// const { unmount } = renderHook(() => useHookName())
//
// expect(window.addEventListener).toHaveBeenCalled()
//
// unmount()
//
// expect(window.removeEventListener).toHaveBeenCalled()
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Edge Cases
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
describe('Edge Cases', () => {
it('should handle null input', () => {
// const { result } = renderHook(() => useHookName(null))
//
// expect(result.current.value).toBeNull()
})
it('should handle rapid updates', () => {
// const { result } = renderHook(() => useHookName())
//
// act(() => {
// result.current.setValue('1')
// result.current.setValue('2')
// result.current.setValue('3')
// })
//
// expect(result.current.value).toBe('3')
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// With Context (if hook uses context)
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
describe('With Context', () => {
it('should use context value', () => {
// const wrapper = createWrapper({ someValue: 'context-value' })
// const { result } = renderHook(() => useHookName(), { wrapper })
//
// expect(result.current.contextValue).toBe('context-value')
})
})
})
/**
* Test Template for Utility Functions
*
* Instructions:
* 1. Replace `utilityFunction` with your function name
* 2. Update import path
* 3. Use test.each for data-driven tests
*/
// import { utilityFunction } from './utility'
// ============================================================================
// Tests
// ============================================================================
describe('utilityFunction', () => {
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Basic Functionality
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
describe('Basic Functionality', () => {
it('should return expected result for valid input', () => {
// expect(utilityFunction('input')).toBe('expected-output')
})
it('should handle multiple arguments', () => {
// expect(utilityFunction('a', 'b', 'c')).toBe('abc')
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Data-Driven Tests
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
describe('Input/Output Mapping', () => {
test.each([
// [input, expected]
['input1', 'output1'],
['input2', 'output2'],
['input3', 'output3'],
])('should return %s for input %s', (input, expected) => {
// expect(utilityFunction(input)).toBe(expected)
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Edge Cases
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
describe('Edge Cases', () => {
it('should handle empty string', () => {
// expect(utilityFunction('')).toBe('')
})
it('should handle null', () => {
// expect(utilityFunction(null)).toBe(null)
// or
// expect(() => utilityFunction(null)).toThrow()
})
it('should handle undefined', () => {
// expect(utilityFunction(undefined)).toBe(undefined)
// or
// expect(() => utilityFunction(undefined)).toThrow()
})
it('should handle empty array', () => {
// expect(utilityFunction([])).toEqual([])
})
it('should handle empty object', () => {
// expect(utilityFunction({})).toEqual({})
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Boundary Conditions
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
describe('Boundary Conditions', () => {
it('should handle minimum value', () => {
// expect(utilityFunction(0)).toBe(0)
})
it('should handle maximum value', () => {
// expect(utilityFunction(Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER)).toBe(...)
})
it('should handle negative numbers', () => {
// expect(utilityFunction(-1)).toBe(...)
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Type Coercion (if applicable)
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
describe('Type Handling', () => {
it('should handle numeric string', () => {
// expect(utilityFunction('123')).toBe(123)
})
it('should handle boolean', () => {
// expect(utilityFunction(true)).toBe(...)
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Error Cases
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
describe('Error Handling', () => {
it('should throw for invalid input', () => {
// expect(() => utilityFunction('invalid')).toThrow('Error message')
})
it('should throw with specific error type', () => {
// expect(() => utilityFunction('invalid')).toThrow(ValidationError)
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Complex Objects (if applicable)
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
describe('Object Handling', () => {
it('should preserve object structure', () => {
// const input = { a: 1, b: 2 }
// expect(utilityFunction(input)).toEqual({ a: 1, b: 2 })
})
it('should handle nested objects', () => {
// const input = { nested: { deep: 'value' } }
// expect(utilityFunction(input)).toEqual({ nested: { deep: 'transformed' } })
})
it('should not mutate input', () => {
// const input = { a: 1 }
// const inputCopy = { ...input }
// utilityFunction(input)
// expect(input).toEqual(inputCopy)
})
})
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Array Handling (if applicable)
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
describe('Array Handling', () => {
it('should process all elements', () => {
// expect(utilityFunction([1, 2, 3])).toEqual([2, 4, 6])
})
it('should handle single element array', () => {
// expect(utilityFunction([1])).toEqual([2])
})
it('should preserve order', () => {
// expect(utilityFunction(['c', 'a', 'b'])).toEqual(['c', 'a', 'b'])
})
})
})
Async Testing Guide
Core Async Patterns
1. waitFor - Wait for Condition
import { render, screen, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'
it('should load and display data', async () => {
render(<DataComponent />)
// Wait for element to appear
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText('Loaded Data')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
it('should hide loading spinner after load', async () => {
render(<DataComponent />)
// Wait for element to disappear
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.queryByText('Loading...')).not.toBeInTheDocument()
})
})2. findBy\* - Async Queries
it('should show user name after fetch', async () => {
render(<UserProfile />)
// findBy returns a promise, auto-waits up to 1000ms
const userName = await screen.findByText('John Doe')
expect(userName).toBeInTheDocument()
// findByRole with options
const button = await screen.findByRole('button', { name: /submit/i })
expect(button).toBeEnabled()
})3. userEvent for Async Interactions
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'
it('should submit form', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
const onSubmit = vi.fn()
render(<Form onSubmit={onSubmit} />)
// userEvent methods are async
await user.type(screen.getByLabelText('Email'), 'test@example.com')
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /submit/i }))
await waitFor(() => {
expect(onSubmit).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ email: 'test@example.com' })
})
})Fake Timers
When to Use Fake Timers
- Testing components with
setTimeout/setInterval - Testing debounce/throttle behavior
- Testing animations or delayed transitions
- Testing polling or retry logic
Basic Fake Timer Setup
describe('Debounced Search', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.useFakeTimers()
})
afterEach(() => {
vi.useRealTimers()
})
it('should debounce search input', async () => {
const onSearch = vi.fn()
render(<SearchInput onSearch={onSearch} debounceMs={300} />)
// Type in the input
fireEvent.change(screen.getByRole('textbox'), { target: { value: 'query' } })
// Search not called immediately
expect(onSearch).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
// Advance timers
vi.advanceTimersByTime(300)
// Now search is called
expect(onSearch).toHaveBeenCalledWith('query')
})
})Fake Timers with Async Code
it('should retry on failure', async () => {
vi.useFakeTimers()
const fetchData = vi.fn()
.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error('Network error'))
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ data: 'success' })
render(<RetryComponent fetchData={fetchData} retryDelayMs={1000} />)
// First call fails
await waitFor(() => {
expect(fetchData).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})
// Advance timer for retry
vi.advanceTimersByTime(1000)
// Second call succeeds
await waitFor(() => {
expect(fetchData).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2)
expect(screen.getByText('success')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
vi.useRealTimers()
})Common Fake Timer Utilities
// Run all pending timers
vi.runAllTimers()
// Run only pending timers (not new ones created during execution)
vi.runOnlyPendingTimers()
// Advance by specific time
vi.advanceTimersByTime(1000)
// Get current fake time
Date.now()
// Clear all timers
vi.clearAllTimers()API Testing Patterns
Loading → Success → Error States
describe('DataFetcher', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
})
it('should show loading state', () => {
mockedApi.fetchData.mockImplementation(() => new Promise(() => {})) // Never resolves
render(<DataFetcher />)
expect(screen.getByTestId('loading-spinner')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should show data on success', async () => {
mockedApi.fetchData.mockResolvedValue({ items: ['Item 1', 'Item 2'] })
render(<DataFetcher />)
// Use findBy* for multiple async elements (better error messages than waitFor with multiple assertions)
const item1 = await screen.findByText('Item 1')
const item2 = await screen.findByText('Item 2')
expect(item1).toBeInTheDocument()
expect(item2).toBeInTheDocument()
expect(screen.queryByTestId('loading-spinner')).not.toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should show error on failure', async () => {
mockedApi.fetchData.mockRejectedValue(new Error('Failed to fetch'))
render(<DataFetcher />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText(/failed to fetch/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
it('should retry on error', async () => {
mockedApi.fetchData.mockRejectedValue(new Error('Network error'))
render(<DataFetcher />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /retry/i })).toBeInTheDocument()
})
mockedApi.fetchData.mockResolvedValue({ items: ['Item 1'] })
fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /retry/i }))
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText('Item 1')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
})Testing Mutations
it('should submit form and show success', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
mockedApi.createItem.mockResolvedValue({ id: '1', name: 'New Item' })
render(<CreateItemForm />)
await user.type(screen.getByLabelText('Name'), 'New Item')
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /create/i }))
// Button should be disabled during submission
expect(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /creating/i })).toBeDisabled()
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText(/created successfully/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
expect(mockedApi.createItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ name: 'New Item' })
})useEffect Testing
Testing Effect Execution
it('should fetch data on mount', async () => {
const fetchData = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ data: 'test' })
render(<ComponentWithEffect fetchData={fetchData} />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(fetchData).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})
})Testing Effect Dependencies
it('should refetch when id changes', async () => {
const fetchData = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ data: 'test' })
const { rerender } = render(<ComponentWithEffect id="1" fetchData={fetchData} />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(fetchData).toHaveBeenCalledWith('1')
})
rerender(<ComponentWithEffect id="2" fetchData={fetchData} />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(fetchData).toHaveBeenCalledWith('2')
expect(fetchData).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2)
})
})Testing Effect Cleanup
it('should cleanup subscription on unmount', () => {
const subscribe = vi.fn()
const unsubscribe = vi.fn()
subscribe.mockReturnValue(unsubscribe)
const { unmount } = render(<SubscriptionComponent subscribe={subscribe} />)
expect(subscribe).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
unmount()
expect(unsubscribe).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})Common Async Pitfalls
❌ Don't: Forget to await
// Bad - test may pass even if assertion fails
it('should load data', () => {
render(<Component />)
waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText('Data')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
// Good - properly awaited
it('should load data', async () => {
render(<Component />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText('Data')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})❌ Don't: Use multiple assertions in single waitFor
// Bad - if first assertion fails, won't know about second
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText('Title')).toBeInTheDocument()
expect(screen.getByText('Description')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
// Good - separate waitFor or use findBy
const title = await screen.findByText('Title')
const description = await screen.findByText('Description')
expect(title).toBeInTheDocument()
expect(description).toBeInTheDocument()❌ Don't: Mix fake timers with real async
// Bad - fake timers don't work well with real Promises
vi.useFakeTimers()
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText('Data')).toBeInTheDocument()
}) // May timeout!
// Good - use runAllTimers or advanceTimersByTime
vi.useFakeTimers()
render(<Component />)
vi.runAllTimers()
expect(screen.getByText('Data')).toBeInTheDocument()Test Generation Checklist
Use this checklist when generating or reviewing tests for Dify frontend components.
Pre-Generation
- [ ] Read the component source code completely
- [ ] Identify component type (component, hook, utility, page)
- [ ] Run
pnpm analyze-component <path>if available - [ ] Note complexity score and features detected
- [ ] Check for existing tests in the same directory
- [ ] Identify ALL files in the directory that need testing (not just index)
Testing Strategy
⚠️ Incremental Workflow (CRITICAL for Multi-File)
- [ ] NEVER generate all tests at once - process one file at a time
- [ ] Order files by complexity: utilities → hooks → simple → complex → integration
- [ ] Create a todo list to track progress before starting
- [ ] For EACH file: write → run test → verify pass → then next
- [ ] DO NOT proceed to next file until current one passes
Path-Level Coverage
- [ ] Test ALL files in the assigned directory/path
- [ ] List all components, hooks, utilities that need coverage
- [ ] Decide: single spec file (integration) or multiple spec files (unit)
Complexity Assessment
- [ ] Run
pnpm analyze-component <path>for complexity score - [ ] Complexity > 50: Consider refactoring before testing
- [ ] 500+ lines: Consider splitting before testing
- [ ] 30-50 complexity: Use multiple describe blocks, organized structure
Integration vs Mocking
- [ ] DO NOT mock base components or dify-ui primitives (base
Loading,Input,Badge; dify-uiButton,Tooltip,Dialog, etc.) - [ ] Import real project components instead of mocking
- [ ] Only mock: API calls, complex context providers, third-party libs with side effects
- [ ] Prefer integration testing when using single spec file
Required Test Sections
All Components MUST Have
- [ ] Rendering tests - Component renders without crashing
- [ ] Props tests - Required props, optional props, default values
- [ ] Edge cases - null, undefined, empty values, boundaries
Conditional Sections (Add When Feature Present)
| Feature | Add Tests For |
|---|---|
useState | Initial state, transitions, cleanup |
useEffect | Execution, dependencies, cleanup |
| Event handlers | onClick, onChange, onSubmit, keyboard |
| API calls | Loading, success, error states |
| Routing | Navigation, params, query strings |
useCallback/useMemo | Referential equality |
| Context | Provider values, consumer behavior |
| Forms | Validation, submission, error display |
Code Quality Checklist
Structure
- [ ] Uses
describeblocks to group related tests - [ ] Test names follow
should <behavior> when <condition>pattern - [ ] AAA pattern (Arrange-Act-Assert) is clear
- [ ] Comments explain complex test scenarios
Mocks
- [ ] DO NOT mock base components or dify-ui primitives (
@/app/components/base/*or@langgenius/dify-ui/*) - [ ]
vi.clearAllMocks()inbeforeEach(notafterEach) - [ ] Shared mock state reset in
beforeEach - [ ] i18n uses global mock (auto-loaded in
web/vitest.setup.ts); only override locally for custom translations - [ ] Router mocks match actual Next.js API
- [ ] Mocks reflect actual component conditional behavior
- [ ] Only mock: API services, complex context providers, third-party libs
- [ ] For
nuqsURL-state tests, wrap withNuqsTestingAdapter(preferweb/test/nuqs-testing.tsx) - [ ] For
nuqsURL-state tests, assertonUrlUpdatepayload (searchParams,options.history) - [ ] If custom
nuqsparser exists, add round-trip tests for encoded edge cases (%2F,%25, spaces, legacy encoded values)
Queries
- [ ] Prefer semantic queries (
getByRole,getByLabelText) - [ ] Use
queryBy*for absence assertions - [ ] Use
findBy*for async elements - [ ]
getByTestIdonly as last resort
Async
- [ ] All async tests use
async/await - [ ]
waitForwraps async assertions - [ ] Fake timers properly setup/teardown
- [ ] No floating promises
TypeScript
- [ ] No
anytypes without justification - [ ] Mock data uses actual types from source
- [ ] Factory functions have proper return types
Coverage Goals (Per File)
For the current file being tested:
- [ ] 100% function coverage
- [ ] 100% statement coverage
- [ ] >95% branch coverage
- [ ] >95% line coverage
Post-Generation (Per File)
Run these checks after EACH test file, not just at the end:
- [ ] Run
pnpm test path/to/file.spec.tsx- MUST PASS before next file - [ ] Fix any failures immediately
- [ ] Mark file as complete in todo list
- [ ] Only then proceed to next file
After All Files Complete
- [ ] Run full directory test:
pnpm test path/to/directory/ - [ ] Check coverage report:
pnpm test:coverage - [ ] Run
pnpm lint:fixon all test files - [ ] Run
pnpm type-check
Common Issues to Watch
False Positives
// ❌ Mock doesn't match actual behavior
vi.mock('./Component', () => () => <div>Mocked</div>)
// ✅ Mock matches actual conditional logic
vi.mock('./Component', () => ({ isOpen }: any) =>
isOpen ? <div>Content</div> : null
)State Leakage
// ❌ Shared state not reset
let mockState = false
vi.mock('./useHook', () => () => mockState)
// ✅ Reset in beforeEach
beforeEach(() => {
mockState = false
})Async Race Conditions
// ❌ Not awaited
it('loads data', () => {
render(<Component />)
expect(screen.getByText('Data')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
// ✅ Properly awaited
it('loads data', async () => {
render(<Component />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText('Data')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})Missing Edge Cases
Always test these scenarios:
null/undefinedinputs- Empty strings / arrays / objects
- Boundary values (0, -1, MAX_INT)
- Error states
- Loading states
- Disabled states
Quick Commands
# Run specific test
pnpm test path/to/file.spec.tsx
# Run with coverage
pnpm test:coverage path/to/file.spec.tsx
# Watch mode
pnpm test:watch path/to/file.spec.tsx
# Update snapshots (use sparingly)
pnpm test -u path/to/file.spec.tsx
# Analyze component
pnpm analyze-component path/to/component.tsx
# Review existing test
pnpm analyze-component path/to/component.tsx --reviewCommon Testing Patterns
Query Priority
Use queries in this order (most to least preferred):
// 1. getByRole - Most recommended (accessibility)
screen.getByRole('button', { name: /submit/i })
screen.getByRole('textbox', { name: /email/i })
screen.getByRole('heading', { level: 1 })
// 2. getByLabelText - Form fields
screen.getByLabelText('Email address')
screen.getByLabelText(/password/i)
// 3. getByPlaceholderText - When no label
screen.getByPlaceholderText('Search...')
// 4. getByText - Non-interactive elements
screen.getByText('Welcome to Dify')
screen.getByText(/loading/i)
// 5. getByDisplayValue - Current input value
screen.getByDisplayValue('current value')
// 6. getByAltText - Images
screen.getByAltText('Company logo')
// 7. getByTitle - Tooltip elements
screen.getByTitle('Close')
// 8. getByTestId - Last resort only!
screen.getByTestId('custom-element')Event Handling Patterns
Click Events
// Basic click
fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
// With userEvent (preferred for realistic interaction)
const user = userEvent.setup()
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
// Double click
await user.dblClick(screen.getByRole('button'))
// Right click
await user.pointer({ keys: '[MouseRight]', target: screen.getByRole('button') })Form Input
const user = userEvent.setup()
// Type in input
await user.type(screen.getByRole('textbox'), 'Hello World')
// Clear and type
await user.clear(screen.getByRole('textbox'))
await user.type(screen.getByRole('textbox'), 'New value')
// Select option
await user.selectOptions(screen.getByRole('combobox'), 'option-value')
// Check checkbox
await user.click(screen.getByRole('checkbox'))
// Upload file
const file = new File(['content'], 'test.pdf', { type: 'application/pdf' })
await user.upload(screen.getByLabelText(/upload/i), file)Keyboard Events
const user = userEvent.setup()
// Press Enter
await user.keyboard('{Enter}')
// Press Escape
await user.keyboard('{Escape}')
// Keyboard shortcut
await user.keyboard('{Control>}a{/Control}') // Ctrl+A
// Tab navigation
await user.tab()
// Arrow keys
await user.keyboard('{ArrowDown}')
await user.keyboard('{ArrowUp}')Component State Testing
Testing State Transitions
describe('Counter', () => {
it('should increment count', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
render(<Counter initialCount={0} />)
// Initial state
expect(screen.getByText('Count: 0')).toBeInTheDocument()
// Trigger transition
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /increment/i }))
// New state
expect(screen.getByText('Count: 1')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})Testing Controlled Components
describe('ControlledInput', () => {
it('should call onChange with new value', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
const handleChange = vi.fn()
render(<ControlledInput value="" onChange={handleChange} />)
await user.type(screen.getByRole('textbox'), 'a')
expect(handleChange).toHaveBeenCalledWith('a')
})
it('should display controlled value', () => {
render(<ControlledInput value="controlled" onChange={vi.fn()} />)
expect(screen.getByRole('textbox')).toHaveValue('controlled')
})
})Conditional Rendering Testing
describe('ConditionalComponent', () => {
it('should show loading state', () => {
render(<DataDisplay isLoading={true} data={null} />)
expect(screen.getByText(/loading/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
expect(screen.queryByTestId('data-content')).not.toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should show error state', () => {
render(<DataDisplay isLoading={false} data={null} error="Failed to load" />)
expect(screen.getByText(/failed to load/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should show data when loaded', () => {
render(<DataDisplay isLoading={false} data={{ name: 'Test' }} />)
expect(screen.getByText('Test')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should show empty state when no data', () => {
render(<DataDisplay isLoading={false} data={[]} />)
expect(screen.getByText(/no data/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})List Rendering Testing
describe('ItemList', () => {
const items = [
{ id: '1', name: 'Item 1' },
{ id: '2', name: 'Item 2' },
{ id: '3', name: 'Item 3' },
]
it('should render all items', () => {
render(<ItemList items={items} />)
expect(screen.getAllByRole('listitem')).toHaveLength(3)
items.forEach(item => {
expect(screen.getByText(item.name)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
it('should handle item selection', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
const onSelect = vi.fn()
render(<ItemList items={items} onSelect={onSelect} />)
await user.click(screen.getByText('Item 2'))
expect(onSelect).toHaveBeenCalledWith(items[1])
})
it('should handle empty list', () => {
render(<ItemList items={[]} />)
expect(screen.getByText(/no items/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})Modal/Dialog Testing
describe('Modal', () => {
it('should not render when closed', () => {
render(<Modal isOpen={false} onClose={vi.fn()} />)
expect(screen.queryByRole('dialog')).not.toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should render when open', () => {
render(<Modal isOpen={true} onClose={vi.fn()} />)
expect(screen.getByRole('dialog')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should call onClose when clicking overlay', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
const handleClose = vi.fn()
render(<Modal isOpen={true} onClose={handleClose} />)
await user.click(screen.getByTestId('modal-overlay'))
expect(handleClose).toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('should call onClose when pressing Escape', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
const handleClose = vi.fn()
render(<Modal isOpen={true} onClose={handleClose} />)
await user.keyboard('{Escape}')
expect(handleClose).toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('should trap focus inside modal', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
render(
<Modal isOpen={true} onClose={vi.fn()}>
<button>First</button>
<button>Second</button>
</Modal>
)
// Focus should cycle within modal
await user.tab()
expect(screen.getByText('First')).toHaveFocus()
await user.tab()
expect(screen.getByText('Second')).toHaveFocus()
await user.tab()
expect(screen.getByText('First')).toHaveFocus() // Cycles back
})
})Form Testing
describe('LoginForm', () => {
it('should submit valid form', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
const onSubmit = vi.fn()
render(<LoginForm onSubmit={onSubmit} />)
await user.type(screen.getByLabelText(/email/i), 'test@example.com')
await user.type(screen.getByLabelText(/password/i), 'password123')
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /sign in/i }))
expect(onSubmit).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
email: 'test@example.com',
password: 'password123',
})
})
it('should show validation errors', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
render(<LoginForm onSubmit={vi.fn()} />)
// Submit empty form
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /sign in/i }))
expect(screen.getByText(/email is required/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
expect(screen.getByText(/password is required/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should validate email format', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
render(<LoginForm onSubmit={vi.fn()} />)
await user.type(screen.getByLabelText(/email/i), 'invalid-email')
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /sign in/i }))
expect(screen.getByText(/invalid email/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should disable submit button while submitting', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
const onSubmit = vi.fn(() => new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 100)))
render(<LoginForm onSubmit={onSubmit} />)
await user.type(screen.getByLabelText(/email/i), 'test@example.com')
await user.type(screen.getByLabelText(/password/i), 'password123')
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /sign in/i }))
expect(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /signing in/i })).toBeDisabled()
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /sign in/i })).toBeEnabled()
})
})
})Data-Driven Tests with test.each
describe('StatusBadge', () => {
test.each([
['success', 'bg-green-500'],
['warning', 'bg-yellow-500'],
['error', 'bg-red-500'],
['info', 'bg-blue-500'],
])('should apply correct class for %s status', (status, expectedClass) => {
render(<StatusBadge status={status} />)
expect(screen.getByTestId('status-badge')).toHaveClass(expectedClass)
})
test.each([
{ input: null, expected: 'Unknown' },
{ input: undefined, expected: 'Unknown' },
{ input: '', expected: 'Unknown' },
{ input: 'invalid', expected: 'Unknown' },
])('should show "Unknown" for invalid input: $input', ({ input, expected }) => {
render(<StatusBadge status={input} />)
expect(screen.getByText(expected)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})Debugging Tips
// Print entire DOM
screen.debug()
// Print specific element
screen.debug(screen.getByRole('button'))
// Log testing playground URL
screen.logTestingPlaygroundURL()
// Pretty print DOM
import { prettyDOM } from '@testing-library/react'
console.log(prettyDOM(screen.getByRole('dialog')))
// Check available roles
import { getRoles } from '@testing-library/react'
console.log(getRoles(container))Common Mistakes to Avoid
❌ Don't Use Implementation Details
// Bad - testing implementation
expect(component.state.isOpen).toBe(true)
expect(wrapper.find('.internal-class').length).toBe(1)
// Good - testing behavior
expect(screen.getByRole('dialog')).toBeInTheDocument()❌ Don't Forget Cleanup
// Bad - may leak state between tests
it('test 1', () => {
render(<Component />)
})
// Good - cleanup is automatic with RTL, but reset mocks
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
})❌ Don't Use Exact String Matching (Prefer Black-Box Assertions)
// ❌ Bad - hardcoded strings are brittle
expect(screen.getByText('Submit Form')).toBeInTheDocument()
expect(screen.getByText('Loading...')).toBeInTheDocument()
// ✅ Good - role-based queries (most semantic)
expect(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /submit/i })).toBeInTheDocument()
expect(screen.getByRole('status')).toBeInTheDocument()
// ✅ Good - pattern matching (flexible)
expect(screen.getByText(/submit/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
expect(screen.getByText(/loading/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
// ✅ Good - test behavior, not exact UI text
expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
expect(screen.getByRole('alert')).toBeInTheDocument()Why prefer black-box assertions?
- Text content may change (i18n, copy updates)
- Role-based queries test accessibility
- Pattern matching is resilient to minor changes
- Tests focus on behavior, not implementation details
❌ Don't Assert on Absence Without Query
// Bad - throws if not found
expect(screen.getByText('Error')).not.toBeInTheDocument() // Error!
// Good - use queryBy for absence assertions
expect(screen.queryByText('Error')).not.toBeInTheDocument()Domain-Specific Component Testing
This guide covers testing patterns for Dify's domain-specific components.
Workflow Components (workflow/)
Workflow components handle node configuration, data flow, and graph operations.
Key Test Areas
1. Node Configuration 1. Data Validation 1. Variable Passing 1. Edge Connections 1. Error Handling
Example: Node Configuration Panel
import { render, screen, fireEvent, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'
import NodeConfigPanel from './node-config-panel'
import { createMockNode, createMockWorkflowContext } from '@/__mocks__/workflow'
// Mock workflow context
vi.mock('@/app/components/workflow/hooks', () => ({
useWorkflowStore: () => mockWorkflowStore,
useNodesInteractions: () => mockNodesInteractions,
}))
let mockWorkflowStore = {
nodes: [],
edges: [],
updateNode: vi.fn(),
}
let mockNodesInteractions = {
handleNodeSelect: vi.fn(),
handleNodeDelete: vi.fn(),
}
describe('NodeConfigPanel', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
mockWorkflowStore = {
nodes: [],
edges: [],
updateNode: vi.fn(),
}
})
describe('Node Configuration', () => {
it('should render node type selector', () => {
const node = createMockNode({ type: 'llm' })
render(<NodeConfigPanel node={node} />)
expect(screen.getByLabelText(/model/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should update node config on change', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
const node = createMockNode({ type: 'llm' })
render(<NodeConfigPanel node={node} />)
await user.selectOptions(screen.getByLabelText(/model/i), 'gpt-4')
expect(mockWorkflowStore.updateNode).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
node.id,
expect.objectContaining({ model: 'gpt-4' })
)
})
})
describe('Data Validation', () => {
it('should show error for invalid input', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
const node = createMockNode({ type: 'code' })
render(<NodeConfigPanel node={node} />)
// Enter invalid code
const codeInput = screen.getByLabelText(/code/i)
await user.clear(codeInput)
await user.type(codeInput, 'invalid syntax {{{')
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText(/syntax error/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
it('should validate required fields', async () => {
const node = createMockNode({ type: 'http', data: { url: '' } })
render(<NodeConfigPanel node={node} />)
fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /save/i }))
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText(/url is required/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
})
describe('Variable Passing', () => {
it('should display available variables from upstream nodes', () => {
const upstreamNode = createMockNode({
id: 'node-1',
type: 'start',
data: { outputs: [{ name: 'user_input', type: 'string' }] },
})
const currentNode = createMockNode({
id: 'node-2',
type: 'llm',
})
mockWorkflowStore.nodes = [upstreamNode, currentNode]
mockWorkflowStore.edges = [{ source: 'node-1', target: 'node-2' }]
render(<NodeConfigPanel node={currentNode} />)
// Variable selector should show upstream variables
fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /add variable/i }))
expect(screen.getByText('user_input')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should insert variable into prompt template', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
const node = createMockNode({ type: 'llm' })
render(<NodeConfigPanel node={node} />)
// Click variable button
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /insert variable/i }))
await user.click(screen.getByText('user_input'))
const promptInput = screen.getByLabelText(/prompt/i)
expect(promptInput).toHaveValue(expect.stringContaining('{{user_input}}'))
})
})
})Dataset Components (dataset/)
Dataset components handle file uploads, data display, and search/filter operations.
Key Test Areas
1. File Upload 1. File Type Validation 1. Pagination 1. Search & Filtering 1. Data Format Handling
Example: Document Uploader
import { render, screen, fireEvent, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'
import DocumentUploader from './document-uploader'
vi.mock('@/service/datasets', () => ({
uploadDocument: vi.fn(),
parseDocument: vi.fn(),
}))
import * as datasetService from '@/service/datasets'
const mockedService = vi.mocked(datasetService)
describe('DocumentUploader', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
})
describe('File Upload', () => {
it('should accept valid file types', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
const onUpload = vi.fn()
mockedService.uploadDocument.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'doc-1' })
render(<DocumentUploader onUpload={onUpload} />)
const file = new File(['content'], 'test.pdf', { type: 'application/pdf' })
const input = screen.getByLabelText(/upload/i)
await user.upload(input, file)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(mockedService.uploadDocument).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.any(FormData)
)
})
})
it('should reject invalid file types', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
render(<DocumentUploader />)
const file = new File(['content'], 'test.exe', { type: 'application/x-msdownload' })
const input = screen.getByLabelText(/upload/i)
await user.upload(input, file)
expect(screen.getByText(/unsupported file type/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
expect(mockedService.uploadDocument).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('should show upload progress', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
// Mock upload with progress
mockedService.uploadDocument.mockImplementation(() => {
return new Promise((resolve) => {
setTimeout(() => resolve({ id: 'doc-1' }), 100)
})
})
render(<DocumentUploader />)
const file = new File(['content'], 'test.pdf', { type: 'application/pdf' })
await user.upload(screen.getByLabelText(/upload/i), file)
expect(screen.getByRole('progressbar')).toBeInTheDocument()
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.queryByRole('progressbar')).not.toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
})
describe('Error Handling', () => {
it('should handle upload failure', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
mockedService.uploadDocument.mockRejectedValue(new Error('Upload failed'))
render(<DocumentUploader />)
const file = new File(['content'], 'test.pdf', { type: 'application/pdf' })
await user.upload(screen.getByLabelText(/upload/i), file)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText(/upload failed/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
it('should allow retry after failure', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
mockedService.uploadDocument
.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error('Network error'))
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ id: 'doc-1' })
render(<DocumentUploader />)
const file = new File(['content'], 'test.pdf', { type: 'application/pdf' })
await user.upload(screen.getByLabelText(/upload/i), file)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /retry/i })).toBeInTheDocument()
})
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /retry/i }))
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText(/uploaded successfully/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
})
})Example: Document List with Pagination
describe('DocumentList', () => {
describe('Pagination', () => {
it('should load first page on mount', async () => {
mockedService.getDocuments.mockResolvedValue({
data: [{ id: '1', name: 'Doc 1' }],
total: 50,
page: 1,
pageSize: 10,
})
render(<DocumentList datasetId="ds-1" />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText('Doc 1')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
expect(mockedService.getDocuments).toHaveBeenCalledWith('ds-1', { page: 1 })
})
it('should navigate to next page', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
mockedService.getDocuments.mockResolvedValue({
data: [{ id: '1', name: 'Doc 1' }],
total: 50,
page: 1,
pageSize: 10,
})
render(<DocumentList datasetId="ds-1" />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText('Doc 1')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
mockedService.getDocuments.mockResolvedValue({
data: [{ id: '11', name: 'Doc 11' }],
total: 50,
page: 2,
pageSize: 10,
})
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /next/i }))
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText('Doc 11')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
})
describe('Search & Filtering', () => {
it('should filter by search query', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
vi.useFakeTimers()
render(<DocumentList datasetId="ds-1" />)
await user.type(screen.getByPlaceholderText(/search/i), 'test query')
// Debounce
vi.advanceTimersByTime(300)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(mockedService.getDocuments).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'ds-1',
expect.objectContaining({ search: 'test query' })
)
})
vi.useRealTimers()
})
})
})Configuration Components (app/configuration/, config/)
Configuration components handle forms, validation, and data persistence.
Key Test Areas
1. Form Validation 1. Save/Reset 1. Required vs Optional Fields 1. Configuration Persistence 1. Error Feedback
Example: App Configuration Form
import { render, screen, fireEvent, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event'
import AppConfigForm from './app-config-form'
vi.mock('@/service/apps', () => ({
updateAppConfig: vi.fn(),
getAppConfig: vi.fn(),
}))
import * as appService from '@/service/apps'
const mockedService = vi.mocked(appService)
describe('AppConfigForm', () => {
const defaultConfig = {
name: 'My App',
description: '',
icon: 'default',
openingStatement: '',
}
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
mockedService.getAppConfig.mockResolvedValue(defaultConfig)
})
describe('Form Validation', () => {
it('should require app name', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
render(<AppConfigForm appId="app-1" />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByLabelText(/name/i)).toHaveValue('My App')
})
// Clear name field
await user.clear(screen.getByLabelText(/name/i))
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /save/i }))
expect(screen.getByText(/name is required/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
expect(mockedService.updateAppConfig).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('should validate name length', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
render(<AppConfigForm appId="app-1" />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByLabelText(/name/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
// Enter very long name
await user.clear(screen.getByLabelText(/name/i))
await user.type(screen.getByLabelText(/name/i), 'a'.repeat(101))
expect(screen.getByText(/name must be less than 100 characters/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should allow empty optional fields', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
mockedService.updateAppConfig.mockResolvedValue({ success: true })
render(<AppConfigForm appId="app-1" />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByLabelText(/name/i)).toHaveValue('My App')
})
// Leave description empty (optional)
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /save/i }))
await waitFor(() => {
expect(mockedService.updateAppConfig).toHaveBeenCalled()
})
})
})
describe('Save/Reset Functionality', () => {
it('should save configuration', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
mockedService.updateAppConfig.mockResolvedValue({ success: true })
render(<AppConfigForm appId="app-1" />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByLabelText(/name/i)).toHaveValue('My App')
})
await user.clear(screen.getByLabelText(/name/i))
await user.type(screen.getByLabelText(/name/i), 'Updated App')
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /save/i }))
await waitFor(() => {
expect(mockedService.updateAppConfig).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'app-1',
expect.objectContaining({ name: 'Updated App' })
)
})
expect(screen.getByText(/saved successfully/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should reset to default values', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
render(<AppConfigForm appId="app-1" />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByLabelText(/name/i)).toHaveValue('My App')
})
// Make changes
await user.clear(screen.getByLabelText(/name/i))
await user.type(screen.getByLabelText(/name/i), 'Changed Name')
// Reset
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /reset/i }))
expect(screen.getByLabelText(/name/i)).toHaveValue('My App')
})
it('should show unsaved changes warning', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
render(<AppConfigForm appId="app-1" />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByLabelText(/name/i)).toHaveValue('My App')
})
// Make changes
await user.type(screen.getByLabelText(/name/i), ' Updated')
expect(screen.getByText(/unsaved changes/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
describe('Error Handling', () => {
it('should show error on save failure', async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup()
mockedService.updateAppConfig.mockRejectedValue(new Error('Server error'))
render(<AppConfigForm appId="app-1" />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByLabelText(/name/i)).toHaveValue('My App')
})
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /save/i }))
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText(/failed to save/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
})
})Mocking Guide for Dify Frontend Tests
⚠️ Important: What NOT to Mock
DO NOT Mock Base Components or dify-ui Primitives
*Never mock components from `@/app/components/base/` or from `@langgenius/dify-ui/`** such as:
- Legacy base (
@/app/components/base/*):Loading,Spinner,Input,Badge,Tag - dify-ui primitives (
@langgenius/dify-ui/*):Button,Tooltip,Dialog,Popover,DropdownMenu,ContextMenu,Select,AlertDialog,Toast
Why?
- These components have their own dedicated tests
- Mocking them creates false positives (tests pass but real integration fails)
- Using real components tests actual integration behavior
// ❌ WRONG: Don't mock base components or dify-ui primitives
vi.mock('@/app/components/base/loading', () => () => <div>Loading</div>)
vi.mock('@langgenius/dify-ui/button', () => ({ Button: ({ children }: any) => <button>{children}</button> }))
// ✅ CORRECT: Import and use the real components
import Loading from '@/app/components/base/loading'
import { Button } from '@langgenius/dify-ui/button'
// They will render normally in testsWhat TO Mock
Only mock these categories:
1. API services (@/service/*) - Network calls 1. Complex context providers - When setup is too difficult 1. Third-party libraries with side effects - next/navigation, external SDKs 1. i18n - Always mock to return keys
Zustand Stores - DO NOT Mock Manually
Zustand is globally mocked in web/vitest.setup.ts. Use real stores with setState():
// ✅ CORRECT: Use real store, set test state
import { useAppStore } from '@/app/components/app/store'
useAppStore.setState({ appDetail: { id: 'test', name: 'Test' } })
render(<MyComponent />)
// ❌ WRONG: Don't mock the store module
vi.mock('@/app/components/app/store', () => ({ ... }))See Zustand Store Testing section for full details.
Mock Placement
| Location | Purpose |
|---|---|
web/vitest.setup.ts | Global mocks shared by all tests (react-i18next, zustand, clipboard, FloatingPortal, Monaco, localStorage`) |
web/__mocks__/zustand.ts | Zustand mock implementation (auto-resets stores after each test) |
web/__mocks__/ | Reusable mock factories shared across multiple test files |
| Test file | Test-specific mocks, inline with vi.mock() |
Modules are not mocked automatically. Use vi.mock in test files, or add global mocks in web/vitest.setup.ts.
Note: Zustand is special - it's globally mocked but you should NOT mock store modules manually. See Zustand Store Testing.
Essential Mocks
1. i18n (Auto-loaded via Global Mock)
A global mock is defined in web/vitest.setup.ts and is auto-loaded by Vitest setup.
The global mock provides:
useTranslation- returns translation keys with namespace prefixTranscomponent - renders i18nKey and componentsuseMixedTranslation(from@/app/components/plugins/marketplace/hooks)useGetLanguage(from@/context/i18n) - returns'en-US'
Default behavior: Most tests should use the global mock (no local override needed).
For custom translations: Use the helper function from @/test/i18n-mock:
import { createReactI18nextMock } from '@/test/i18n-mock'
vi.mock('react-i18next', () => createReactI18nextMock({
'my.custom.key': 'Custom translation',
'button.save': 'Save',
}))Avoid: Manually defining useTranslation mocks that just return the key - the global mock already does this.
2. Next.js Router
const mockPush = vi.fn()
const mockReplace = vi.fn()
vi.mock('next/navigation', () => ({
useRouter: () => ({
push: mockPush,
replace: mockReplace,
back: vi.fn(),
prefetch: vi.fn(),
}),
usePathname: () => '/current-path',
useSearchParams: () => new URLSearchParams('?key=value'),
}))
describe('Component', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
})
it('should navigate on click', () => {
render(<Component />)
fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
expect(mockPush).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/expected-path')
})
})2.1 nuqs Query State (Preferred: Testing Adapter)
For tests that validate URL query behavior, use NuqsTestingAdapter instead of mocking nuqs directly.
import { renderHookWithNuqs } from '@/test/nuqs-testing'
it('should sync query to URL with push history', async () => {
const { result, onUrlUpdate } = renderHookWithNuqs(() => useMyQueryState(), {
searchParams: '?page=1',
})
act(() => {
result.current.setQuery({ page: 2 })
})
await waitFor(() => expect(onUrlUpdate).toHaveBeenCalled())
const update = onUrlUpdate.mock.calls[onUrlUpdate.mock.calls.length - 1][0]
expect(update.options.history).toBe('push')
expect(update.searchParams.get('page')).toBe('2')
})Use direct vi.mock('nuqs') only when URL synchronization is intentionally out of scope.
3. Portal Components (with Shared State)
// ⚠️ Important: Use shared state for components that depend on each other
let mockPortalOpenState = false
vi.mock('@/app/components/base/portal-to-follow-elem', () => ({
PortalToFollowElem: ({ children, open, ...props }: any) => {
mockPortalOpenState = open || false // Update shared state
return <div data-testid="portal" data-open={open}>{children}</div>
},
PortalToFollowElemContent: ({ children }: any) => {
// ✅ Matches actual: returns null when portal is closed
if (!mockPortalOpenState) return null
return <div data-testid="portal-content">{children}</div>
},
PortalToFollowElemTrigger: ({ children }: any) => (
<div data-testid="portal-trigger">{children}</div>
),
}))
describe('Component', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
mockPortalOpenState = false // ✅ Reset shared state
})
})4. API Service Mocks
import * as api from '@/service/api'
vi.mock('@/service/api')
const mockedApi = vi.mocked(api)
describe('Component', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
// Setup default mock implementation
mockedApi.fetchData.mockResolvedValue({ data: [] })
})
it('should show data on success', async () => {
mockedApi.fetchData.mockResolvedValue({ data: [{ id: 1 }] })
render(<Component />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText('1')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
it('should show error on failure', async () => {
mockedApi.fetchData.mockRejectedValue(new Error('Network error'))
render(<Component />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText(/error/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
})5. HTTP and fetch Mocking
describe('GithubComponent', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
})
it('should display repo info', async () => {
vi.mocked(globalThis.fetch).mockResolvedValueOnce(
new Response(JSON.stringify({ name: 'dify', stars: 1000 }), {
status: 200,
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
}),
)
render(<GithubComponent />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText('dify')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
it('should handle API error', async () => {
vi.mocked(globalThis.fetch).mockResolvedValueOnce(
new Response(JSON.stringify({ message: 'Server error' }), {
status: 500,
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
}),
)
render(<GithubComponent />)
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText(/error/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
})Prefer mocking @/service/* modules or spying on global.fetch / ky clients with deterministic responses. Do not introduce an HTTP interception dependency such as nock or MSW unless it is already declared in the workspace or adding it is part of the task.
6. Context Providers
import { ProviderContext } from '@/context/provider-context'
import { createMockProviderContextValue, createMockPlan } from '@/__mocks__/provider-context'
describe('Component with Context', () => {
it('should render for free plan', () => {
const mockContext = createMockPlan('sandbox')
render(
<ProviderContext.Provider value={mockContext}>
<Component />
</ProviderContext.Provider>
)
expect(screen.getByText('Upgrade')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('should render for pro plan', () => {
const mockContext = createMockPlan('professional')
render(
<ProviderContext.Provider value={mockContext}>
<Component />
</ProviderContext.Provider>
)
expect(screen.queryByText('Upgrade')).not.toBeInTheDocument()
})
})7. React Query
import { QueryClient, QueryClientProvider } from '@tanstack/react-query'
const createTestQueryClient = () => new QueryClient({
defaultOptions: {
queries: { retry: false },
mutations: { retry: false },
},
})
const renderWithQueryClient = (ui: React.ReactElement) => {
const queryClient = createTestQueryClient()
return render(
<QueryClientProvider client={queryClient}>
{ui}
</QueryClientProvider>
)
}Mock Best Practices
✅ DO
1. Use real base components and dify-ui primitives - Import from @/app/components/base/ or @langgenius/dify-ui/* directly 1. Use real project components - Prefer importing over mocking 1. Use real Zustand stores - Set test state via store.setState() 1. Reset mocks in `beforeEach`, not afterEach 1. Match actual component behavior in mocks (when mocking is necessary) 1. Use factory functions for complex mock data 1. Import actual types for type safety 1. Reset shared mock state in beforeEach
❌ DON'T
1. Don't mock base components or dify-ui primitives (Loading, Input, Button, Tooltip, Dialog, etc.) 1. Don't mock Zustand store modules - Use real stores with setState() 1. Don't mock components you can import directly 1. Don't create overly simplified mocks that miss conditional logic 1. Don't leave HTTP mocks or service mock state leaking between tests 1. Don't use any types in mocks without necessity
Mock Decision Tree
Need to use a component in test?
│
├─ Is it from @/app/components/base/* or @langgenius/dify-ui/*?
│ └─ YES → Import real component, DO NOT mock
│
├─ Is it a project component?
│ └─ YES → Prefer importing real component
│ Only mock if setup is extremely complex
│
├─ Is it an API service (@/service/*)?
│ └─ YES → Mock it
│
├─ Is it a third-party lib with side effects?
│ └─ YES → Mock it (next/navigation, external SDKs)
│
├─ Is it a Zustand store?
│ └─ YES → DO NOT mock the module!
│ Use real store + setState() to set test state
│ (Global mock handles auto-reset)
│
└─ Is it i18n?
└─ YES → Uses shared mock (auto-loaded). Override only for custom translationsZustand Store Testing
Global Zustand Mock (Auto-loaded)
Zustand is globally mocked in web/vitest.setup.ts following the official Zustand testing guide. The mock in web/__mocks__/zustand.ts provides:
- Real store behavior with
getState(),setState(),subscribe()methods - Automatic store reset after each test via
afterEach - Proper test isolation between tests
✅ Recommended: Use Real Stores (Official Best Practice)
DO NOT mock store modules manually. Import and use the real store, then use setState() to set test state:
// ✅ CORRECT: Use real store with setState
import { useAppStore } from '@/app/components/app/store'
describe('MyComponent', () => {
it('should render app details', () => {
// Arrange: Set test state via setState
useAppStore.setState({
appDetail: {
id: 'test-app',
name: 'Test App',
mode: 'chat',
},
})
// Act
render(<MyComponent />)
// Assert
expect(screen.getByText('Test App')).toBeInTheDocument()
// Can also verify store state directly
expect(useAppStore.getState().appDetail?.name).toBe('Test App')
})
// No cleanup needed - global mock auto-resets after each test
})❌ Avoid: Manual Store Module Mocking
Manual mocking conflicts with the global Zustand mock and loses store functionality:
// ❌ WRONG: Don't mock the store module
vi.mock('@/app/components/app/store', () => ({
useStore: (selector) => mockSelector(selector), // Missing getState, setState!
}))
// ❌ WRONG: This conflicts with global zustand mock
vi.mock('@/app/components/workflow/store', () => ({
useWorkflowStore: vi.fn(() => mockState),
}))Problems with manual mocking:
1. Loses getState(), setState(), subscribe() methods 1. Conflicts with global Zustand mock behavior 1. Requires manual maintenance of store API 1. Tests don't reflect actual store behavior
When Manual Store Mocking is Necessary
In rare cases where the store has complex initialization or side effects, you can mock it, but ensure you provide the full store API:
// If you MUST mock (rare), include full store API
const mockStore = {
appDetail: { id: 'test', name: 'Test' },
setAppDetail: vi.fn(),
}
vi.mock('@/app/components/app/store', () => ({
useStore: Object.assign(
(selector: (state: typeof mockStore) => unknown) => selector(mockStore),
{
getState: () => mockStore,
setState: vi.fn(),
subscribe: vi.fn(),
},
),
}))Store Testing Decision Tree
Need to test a component using Zustand store?
│
├─ Can you use the real store?
│ └─ YES → Use real store + setState (RECOMMENDED)
│ useAppStore.setState({ ... })
│
├─ Does the store have complex initialization/side effects?
│ └─ YES → Consider mocking, but include full API
│ (getState, setState, subscribe)
│
└─ Are you testing the store itself (not a component)?
└─ YES → Test store directly with getState/setState
const store = useMyStore
store.setState({ count: 0 })
store.getState().increment()
expect(store.getState().count).toBe(1)Example: Testing Store Actions
import { useCounterStore } from '@/stores/counter'
describe('Counter Store', () => {
it('should increment count', () => {
// Initial state (auto-reset by global mock)
expect(useCounterStore.getState().count).toBe(0)
// Call action
useCounterStore.getState().increment()
// Verify state change
expect(useCounterStore.getState().count).toBe(1)
})
it('should reset to initial state', () => {
// Set some state
useCounterStore.setState({ count: 100 })
expect(useCounterStore.getState().count).toBe(100)
// After this test, global mock will reset to initial state
})
})Factory Function Pattern
// __mocks__/data-factories.ts
import type { User, Project } from '@/types'
export const createMockUser = (overrides: Partial<User> = {}): User => ({
id: 'user-1',
name: 'Test User',
email: 'test@example.com',
role: 'member',
createdAt: new Date().toISOString(),
...overrides,
})
export const createMockProject = (overrides: Partial<Project> = {}): Project => ({
id: 'project-1',
name: 'Test Project',
description: 'A test project',
owner: createMockUser(),
members: [],
createdAt: new Date().toISOString(),
...overrides,
})
// Usage in tests
it('should display project owner', () => {
const project = createMockProject({
owner: createMockUser({ name: 'John Doe' }),
})
render(<ProjectCard project={project} />)
expect(screen.getByText('John Doe')).toBeInTheDocument()
})Testing Workflow Guide
This guide defines the workflow for generating tests, especially for complex components or directories with multiple files.
Scope Clarification
This guide addresses multi-file workflow (how to process multiple test files). For coverage requirements within a single test file, see web/docs/test.md § Coverage Goals.
| Scope | Rule |
|---|---|
| Single file | Complete coverage in one generation (100% function, >95% branch) |
| Multi-file directory | Process one file at a time, verify each before proceeding |
⚠️ Critical Rule: Incremental Approach for Multi-File Testing
When testing a directory with multiple files, NEVER generate all test files at once. Use an incremental, verify-as-you-go approach.
Why Incremental?
| Batch Approach (❌) | Incremental Approach (✅) |
|---|---|
| Generate 5+ tests at once | Generate 1 test at a time |
| Run tests only at the end | Run test immediately after each file |
| Multiple failures compound | Single point of failure, easy to debug |
| Hard to identify root cause | Clear cause-effect relationship |
| Mock issues affect many files | Mock issues caught early |
| Messy git history | Clean, atomic commits possible |
Single File Workflow
When testing a single component, hook, or utility:
1. Read source code completely
2. Run `pnpm analyze-component <path>` (if available)
3. Check complexity score and features detected
4. Write the test file
5. Run test: `pnpm test <file>.spec.tsx`
6. Fix any failures
7. Verify coverage meets goals (100% function, >95% branch)Directory/Multi-File Workflow (MUST FOLLOW)
When testing a directory or multiple files, follow this strict workflow:
Step 1: Analyze and Plan
1. List all files that need tests in the directory 1. Categorize by complexity:
- 🟢 Simple: Utility functions, simple hooks, presentational components
- 🟡 Medium: Components with state, effects, or event handlers
- 🔴 Complex: Components with API calls, routing, or many dependencies
1. Order by dependency: Test dependencies before dependents 1. Create a todo list to track progress
Step 2: Determine Processing Order
Process files in this recommended order:
1. Utility functions (simplest, no React)
2. Custom hooks (isolated logic)
3. Simple presentational components (few/no props)
4. Medium complexity components (state, effects)
5. Complex components (API, routing, many deps)
6. Container/index components (integration tests - last)Rationale:
- Simpler files help establish mock patterns
- Hooks used by components should be tested first
- Integration tests (index files) depend on child components working
Step 3: Process Each File Incrementally
For EACH file in the ordered list:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Write test file │
│ 2. Run: pnpm test <file>.spec.tsx │
│ 3. If FAIL → Fix immediately, re-run │
│ 4. If PASS → Mark complete in todo list │
│ 5. ONLY THEN proceed to next file │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘DO NOT proceed to the next file until the current one passes.
Step 4: Final Verification
After all individual tests pass:
# Run all tests in the directory together
pnpm test path/to/directory/
# Check coverage
pnpm test:coverage path/to/directory/Component Complexity Guidelines
Use pnpm analyze-component <path> to assess complexity before testing.
🔴 Very Complex Components (Complexity > 50)
Consider refactoring BEFORE testing:
- Break component into smaller, testable pieces
- Extract complex logic into custom hooks
- Separate container and presentational layers
If testing as-is:
- Use integration tests for complex workflows
- Use
test.each()for data-driven testing - Multiple
describeblocks for organization - Consider testing major sections separately
🟡 Medium Complexity (Complexity 30-50)
- Group related tests in
describeblocks - Test integration scenarios between internal parts
- Focus on state transitions and side effects
- Use helper functions to reduce test complexity
🟢 Simple Components (Complexity < 30)
- Standard test structure
- Focus on props, rendering, and edge cases
- Usually straightforward to test
📏 Large Files (500+ lines)
Regardless of complexity score:
- Strongly consider refactoring before testing
- If testing as-is, test major sections separately
- Create helper functions for test setup
- May need multiple test files
Todo List Format
When testing multiple files, use a todo list like this:
Testing: path/to/directory/
Ordered by complexity (simple → complex):
☐ utils/helper.ts [utility, simple]
☐ hooks/use-custom-hook.ts [hook, simple]
☐ empty-state.tsx [component, simple]
☐ item-card.tsx [component, medium]
☐ list.tsx [component, complex]
☐ index.tsx [integration]
Progress: 0/6 completeUpdate status as you complete each:
- ☐ → ⏳ (in progress)
- ⏳ → ✅ (complete and verified)
- ⏳ → ❌ (blocked, needs attention)
When to Stop and Verify
Always run tests after:
- Completing a test file
- Making changes to fix a failure
- Modifying shared mocks
- Updating test utilities or helpers
Signs you should pause:
- More than 2 consecutive test failures
- Mock-related errors appearing
- Unclear why a test is failing
- Test passing but coverage unexpectedly low
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
❌ Don't: Generate Everything First
# BAD: Writing all files then testing
Write component-a.spec.tsx
Write component-b.spec.tsx
Write component-c.spec.tsx
Write component-d.spec.tsx
Run pnpm test ← Multiple failures, hard to debug✅ Do: Verify Each Step
# GOOD: Incremental with verification
Write component-a.spec.tsx
Run pnpm test component-a.spec.tsx ✅
Write component-b.spec.tsx
Run pnpm test component-b.spec.tsx ✅
...continue...❌ Don't: Skip Verification for "Simple" Components
Even simple components can have:
- Import errors
- Missing mock setup
- Incorrect assumptions about props
Always verify, regardless of perceived simplicity.
❌ Don't: Continue When Tests Fail
Failing tests compound:
- A mock issue in file A affects files B, C, D
- Fixing A later requires revisiting all dependent tests
- Time wasted on debugging cascading failures
Fix failures immediately before proceeding.
Integration with Codex's Todo Feature
When using Codex for multi-file testing:
1. Create a todo list before starting 1. Process one file at a time 1. Verify each test passes before asking for the next 1. Mark todos complete as you progress
Example prompt:
Test all components in `path/to/directory/`.
First, analyze the directory and create a todo list ordered by complexity.
Then, process ONE file at a time, waiting for my confirmation that tests pass
before proceeding to the next.Summary Checklist
Before starting multi-file testing:
- [ ] Listed all files needing tests
- [ ] Ordered by complexity (simple → complex)
- [ ] Created todo list for tracking
- [ ] Understand dependencies between files
During testing:
- [ ] Processing ONE file at a time
- [ ] Running tests after EACH file
- [ ] Fixing failures BEFORE proceeding
- [ ] Updating todo list progress
After completion:
- [ ] All individual tests pass
- [ ] Full directory test run passes
- [ ] Coverage goals met
- [ ] Todo list shows all complete
Related skills
How it compares
Use frontend-testing over generic Vitest skills when contributing to the Dify repo and tests must match project-specific web/docs/test.md rules.
FAQ
Where should Dify frontend test files live?
In a sibling __tests__/ folder as ComponentName.spec.tsx at the same level as the source file under test.
Should project components be mocked in Dify frontend tests?
No; import real project components and Zustand stores, mocking only external dependencies with vi.mock.
Is Frontend Testing safe to install?
skills.sh reports 3 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.