
Clojure Review
- 1.4k installs
- 48.5k repo stars
- Updated August 5, 2026
- metabase/metabase
clojure-review provides documented workflows for Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull
About
The clojure-review skill review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code. # Clojure Code Review Skill @./../_shared/clojure-style-guide.md @./../_shared/clojure-commands.md ## Review guidelines **What to flag:** - Check compliance with the Metabase Clojure style guide (included above) - If `CLOJURE_STYLE_GUIDE.adoc` exists in the working directory, also check compliance with the community Clojure style guide - Flag all style guide violations **What NOT to post:** - Do not post comments congratulating someone for trivial changes or for following style guidelines - Do not post comments confirming things "look good" or telling them they did something correctly - Only post comments about style violations or potential issues Example bad code review comments to avoid: > This TODO comment is properly formatted with author and date - nice work! > Good addition of limit 1 to the query - this makes the test more efficient without changing its behavior.
- Check compliance with the Metabase Clojure style guide (included above)
- If `CLOJURE_STYLE_GUIDE.adoc` exists in the working directory, also check compliance with the community Clojure style gu
- Flag all style guide violations
- Do not post comments congratulating someone for trivial changes or for following style guidelines
- Do not post comments confirming things "look good" or telling them they did something correctly
Clojure Review by the numbers
- 1,430 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +90 installs in the week ending Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #70 of 911 Databases skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: MEDIUM risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
clojure-review capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- check compliance with the metabase clojure style · if `clojure_style_guide.adoc` exists in the work · flag all style guide violations · do not post comments congratulating someone for · do not post comments confirming things "look goo
- Use cases
- documentation
What clojure-review says it does
> Good addition of limit 1 to the query - this makes the test more efficient without changing its behavior.
> The kondo ignore comment is appropriately placed here > Test name properly ends with -test as required by the style guide.
npx skills add https://github.com/metabase/metabase --skill clojure-reviewAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 1.4k |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 48.5k |
| Security audit | 3 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | August 5, 2026 |
| Repository | metabase/metabase ↗ |
How do I use clojure-review for the task described in its SKILL.md triggers?
Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/Cl.
Who is it for?
Teams invoking clojure-review when the user request matches documented triggers and prerequisites.
Skip if: Skip when cached docs are missing, the request is a negative trigger, or another sibling skill owns the workflow.
When should I use this skill?
Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code.
What you get
Step-by-step guidance grounded in clojure-review documentation and reference files.
- style violation report
- PR review comments
Files
Clojure Code Review Skill
@./../_shared/clojure-style-guide.md @./../_shared/clojure-commands.md
Review guidelines
What to flag:
- Check compliance with the Metabase Clojure style guide (included above)
- If
CLOJURE_STYLE_GUIDE.adocexists in the working directory, also check compliance with the community Clojure style guide - Flag all style guide violations
What NOT to post:
- Do not post comments congratulating someone for trivial changes or for following style guidelines
- Do not post comments confirming things "look good" or telling them they did something correctly
- Only post comments about style violations or potential issues
Example bad code review comments to avoid:
This TODO comment is properly formatted with author and date - nice work!
Good addition of limit 1 to the query - this makes the test more efficient without changing its behavior.
The kondo ignore comment is appropriately placed here
Test name properly ends with -test as required by the style guide.
Special cases:
- Do not post comments about missing parentheses (these will be caught by the linter)
Quick review checklist
Use this to scan through changes efficiently:
Naming
- [ ] Descriptive names (no
tbl,zs') - [ ] Pure functions named as nouns describing their return value
- [ ]
kebab-casefor all variables and functions - [ ] Side-effect functions end with
! - [ ] No namespace-alias repetition in function names
Documentation
- [ ] Public vars in
srcorenterprise/backend/srchave useful docstrings - [ ] Docstrings use Markdown conventions
- [ ] References use
[[other-var]]not backticks - [ ]
TODOcomments include author and date:;; TODO (Name 2025-01-01) -- description
Code Organization
- [ ] Everything
^:privateunless used elsewhere - [ ] No
declarewhen avoidable (public functions near end) - [ ] Functions under 20 lines when possible
- [ ] No blank, non-comment lines within definition forms (except pairwise constructs in
let/cond) - [ ] Lines ≤ 120 characters
Tests
- [ ] Separate
deftestforms for distinct test cases - [ ] Pure tests marked
^:parallel - [ ] Test names end in
-testor-test-<number>
Modules
- [ ] Correct module patterns (OSS:
metabase.<module>.*, EE:metabase-enterprise.<module>.*) - [ ] API endpoints in
<module>.apinamespaces - [ ] Public API in
<module>.corewith Potemkin - [ ] No cheating module linters with
:clj-kondo/ignore [:metabase/modules]
REST API
- [ ] Response schemas present (
:- <schema>) - [ ] Query params use kebab-case, bodies use
snake_case - [ ] Routes use singular nouns (e.g.,
/api/dashboard/:id) - [ ]
GEThas no side effects (except analytics) - [ ] Malli schemas detailed and complete
- [ ] All new endpoints have tests
MBQL
- [ ] No raw MBQL manipulation outside
lib,lib-be, orquery-processormodules - [ ] Uses Lib and MBQL 5, not legacy MBQL
Database
- [ ] Model and table names are singular nouns
- [ ] Uses
t2/select-one-fninstead of selecting full rows for one column - [ ] Logic in Toucan methods, not helper functions
Drivers
- [ ] New multimethods documented in
docs/developers-guide/driver-changelog.md - [ ] Passes
driverargument to other driver methods (no hardcoded driver names) - [ ] Minimal logic in
read-column-thunk
Miscellaneous
- [ ] Example data is bird-themed when possible
- [ ] Kondo linter suppressions use proper format (not
#_:clj-kondo/ignorekeyword form)
Pattern matching table
Quick scan for common issues:
| Pattern | Issue |
|---|---|
calculate-age, get-user | Pure functions should be nouns: age, user |
update-db, save-model | Missing ! for side effects: update-db!, save-model! |
snake_case_var | Should use kebab-case |
| Public var without docstring | Add docstring explaining purpose |
;; TODO fix this | Missing author/date: ;; TODO (Name 2025-01-01) -- description |
(defn foo ...) in namespace used elsewhere | Should be (defn ^:private foo ...) |
| Function > 20 lines | Consider breaking up into smaller functions |
/api/dashboards/:id | Use singular: /api/dashboard/:id |
Query params with snake_case | Use kebab-case for query params |
| New API endpoint without tests | Add tests for the endpoint |
Feedback format examples
For style violations:
This pure function should be named as a noun describing its return value. Consideruserinstead ofget-user.
For missing documentation:
This public var needs a docstring explaining its purpose, inputs, and outputs.
For organization issues:
This function is only used in this namespace, so it should be marked ^:private.For API conventions:
Query parameters should use kebab-case. Changeuser_idtouser-id.
Related skills
FAQ
What does clojure-review do?
Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code.
When should I use clojure-review?
Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code.
What are common prerequisites?
--- name: clojure-review description: Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues.
Is Clojure Review safe to install?
skills.sh reports 3 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.