Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
onewave-ai avatar

Sow Generator

  • 179 installs
  • 237 repo stars
  • Updated July 15, 2026
  • onewave-ai/claude-skills

Draft client-facing statements of work with scope, deliverables, milestones, assumptions, acceptance criteria, and payment terms from project inputs.

About

Consulting and delivery skill that turns discovery notes into polished statements of work with deliverables, timelines, assumptions, acceptance criteria, and billing milestones ready for client review.

  • Scope definition
  • Milestone tables
  • Acceptance criteria
  • Payment terms
  • Assumption logging

Sow Generator by the numbers

  • 179 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • +6 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
  • Ranked #267 of 688 Office & Documents skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills --skill sow-generator

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs179
repo stars237
Last updatedJuly 15, 2026
Repositoryonewave-ai/claude-skills

What it does

Draft client-facing statements of work with scope, deliverables, milestones, assumptions, acceptance criteria, and payment terms from project inputs.

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Statement of Work Generator

Generate complete, client-ready Statements of Work from a project brief, meeting the standards of Big Four consulting firms, top-tier agencies, and enterprise procurement. Produce polished documents ready for client review with minimal edits, never rough drafts or templates with blanks.

Contents

  • references/required-inputs.md -- inputs to gather and pre-generation client research
  • references/document-structure.md -- the 16-section SOW structure with templates for every section
  • references/pricing-templates.md -- fixed-price, time-and-materials, and retainer pricing models (Section 11)
  • references/legal-terms.md -- confidentiality, IP, warranties, liability, termination, and other legal clauses (Section 14)
  • references/change-management.md -- change request and change order process (Section 12)
  • references/risk-management.md -- risk register and escalation path (Section 13)

Workflow

1. Gather the required inputs. Read references/required-inputs.md. If any required item is missing, ask for it explicitly. Do not guess at critical commercial terms. 2. Research the client. Use WebSearch per references/required-inputs.md to gather company overview, recent news, technology footprint, and regulatory environment. If research yields nothing, proceed on user-provided inputs and flag assumptions explicitly. Never fabricate company information. 3. Select the pricing model from references/pricing-templates.md based on engagement type (default: fixed-price). 4. Generate all 16 sections following references/document-structure.md, pulling Section 11 from pricing-templates, Section 12 from change-management, Section 13 from risk-management, and Section 14 from legal-terms. Replace every bracketed placeholder with real values from inputs and research. Leave brackets only where the user explicitly deferred. Mark gaps with [ACTION REQUIRED: ...]. 5. Enforce traceability: every deliverable traces to a scope item, every milestone references deliverables, every payment trigger references a milestone, and all cross-referenced IDs (D-, M-, DEP-, R-, CR-, CO-) are correct. 6. Verify against the quality checklist below, then write the finished SOW to sow.md in the working directory (or a user-specified path).

Output Requirements

  • Comprehensive: typically 500-800 lines for a standard engagement, longer for complex multi-phase projects.
  • Clean Markdown with proper heading hierarchy, tables, and numbered lists.
  • Professional, precise, unambiguous third-person prose. Define any non-standard jargon on first use.
  • No emojis anywhere in the document.
  • Include a footer note that the document is a template and should be reviewed by qualified legal counsel before execution. Never provide legal advice.

Quality Checklist

Verify before finalizing:

  • All user-provided inputs are reflected accurately
  • Client research is incorporated into Background and Context
  • Every in-scope item has corresponding deliverables
  • Every deliverable has measurable acceptance criteria
  • Every milestone has a date, associated deliverables, and payment trigger (if applicable)
  • Out-of-scope section is specific to this engagement, not generic
  • Assumptions are realistic and comprehensive; dependencies have owners and deadlines
  • Risk register contains engagement-specific risks, not boilerplate
  • Payment schedule sums to the total engagement fee
  • Legal sections are complete and internally consistent
  • All cross-references resolve correctly
  • No placeholder brackets remain except those explicitly deferred by the user
  • Document reads as a cohesive narrative, not a filled-in template
  • Tone is professional and consistent throughout

Notes

  • For regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government), include industry-specific compliance sections (Section 15) and note additional legal review requirements.
  • Ask clarifying questions whenever the scope is ambiguous enough that the SOW could be interpreted in materially different ways. Ambiguity in an SOW is a professional failure.

Related skills

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.