
Fine Tuning With Trl
- 401 installs
- 11.2k repo stars
- Updated June 16, 2026
- orchestra-research/ai-research-skills
fine-tuning-with-trl is an agent skill that guides developers through TRL Direct Preference Optimization with the correct DPOConfig loss variant and hyperparameters for chosen/rejected preference pairs.
About
fine-tuning-with-trl is a research-backed Claude Code skill from orchestra-research/ai-research-skills for aligning open models with TRL DPOConfig instead of guessing loss types. The guide documents 10+ DPO loss variants—including sigmoid, IPO, hinge, robust, and BCO—with formulas, when-to-use notes, and copy-paste Python configs covering beta, batch size, and learning rate. Developers reach for fine-tuning-with-trl when wiring preference datasets into Hugging Face TRL trainers and need a defensible loss choice before spending GPU hours on a failed alignment run.
- Documents 10+ DPO loss variants in TRL with formulas and when to use each (sigmoid default, IPO, hinge/SLiC, robust with
- Copy-paste DPOConfig blocks per variant with beta, batch size, learning rate, and length limits where the guide specifie
- Maps scenarios to losses: general alignment, theoretical IPO, margin hinge, noisy labels via robust + label_smoothing
- Centers on chosen/rejected preference pairs and KL-style beta tuning common in RLHF-style workflows
Fine Tuning With Trl by the numbers
- 401 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +37 installs in the week ending Jul 18, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #488 of 2,066 Data Science & ML skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: MEDIUM risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/orchestra-research/ai-research-skills --skill fine-tuning-with-trlAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 401 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 11.2k |
| Security audit | 2 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | June 16, 2026 |
| Repository | orchestra-research/ai-research-skills ↗ |
Which TRL DPO loss variant fits my preference data?
Align an open model on preference pairs with TRL DPOConfig and the right loss variant (sigmoid, IPO, hinge, robust, BCO) instead of guessing hyperparameters.
Who is it for?
ML engineers fine-tuning open LLMs on human or synthetic preference pairs with Hugging Face TRL.
Skip if: Teams that only need prompt engineering or RAG retrieval without updating model weights.
When should I use this skill?
A developer is setting up TRL DPO training and must pick among sigmoid, IPO, hinge, robust, or BCO loss variants.
What you get
A TRL DPOConfig block with loss_type, beta, batch size, and learning rate ready to paste into a training script.
- DPOConfig Python snippet
- loss variant selection rationale
By the numbers
- Documents 10+ TRL DPO loss variants for preference alignment
Files
TRL - Transformer Reinforcement Learning
Quick start
TRL provides post-training methods for aligning language models with human preferences.
Installation:
pip install trl transformers datasets peft accelerateSupervised Fine-Tuning (instruction tuning):
from trl import SFTTrainer
trainer = SFTTrainer(
model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B",
train_dataset=dataset, # Prompt-completion pairs
)
trainer.train()DPO (align with preferences):
from trl import DPOTrainer, DPOConfig
config = DPOConfig(output_dir="model-dpo", beta=0.1)
trainer = DPOTrainer(
model=model,
args=config,
train_dataset=preference_dataset, # chosen/rejected pairs
processing_class=tokenizer
)
trainer.train()Common workflows
Workflow 1: Full RLHF pipeline (SFT → Reward Model → PPO)
Complete pipeline from base model to human-aligned model.
Copy this checklist:
RLHF Training:
- [ ] Step 1: Supervised fine-tuning (SFT)
- [ ] Step 2: Train reward model
- [ ] Step 3: PPO reinforcement learning
- [ ] Step 4: Evaluate aligned modelStep 1: Supervised fine-tuning
Train base model on instruction-following data:
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from trl import SFTTrainer, SFTConfig
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load model
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B")
# Load instruction dataset
dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/Capybara", split="train")
# Configure training
training_args = SFTConfig(
output_dir="Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT",
per_device_train_batch_size=4,
num_train_epochs=1,
learning_rate=2e-5,
logging_steps=10,
save_strategy="epoch"
)
# Train
trainer = SFTTrainer(
model=model,
args=training_args,
train_dataset=dataset,
tokenizer=tokenizer
)
trainer.train()
trainer.save_model()Step 2: Train reward model
Train model to predict human preferences:
from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification
from trl import RewardTrainer, RewardConfig
# Load SFT model as base
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(
"Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT",
num_labels=1 # Single reward score
)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT")
# Load preference data (chosen/rejected pairs)
dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train")
# Configure training
training_args = RewardConfig(
output_dir="Qwen2.5-0.5B-Reward",
per_device_train_batch_size=2,
num_train_epochs=1,
learning_rate=1e-5
)
# Train reward model
trainer = RewardTrainer(
model=model,
args=training_args,
processing_class=tokenizer,
train_dataset=dataset
)
trainer.train()
trainer.save_model()Step 3: PPO reinforcement learning
Optimize policy using reward model:
python -m trl.scripts.ppo \
--model_name_or_path Qwen2.5-0.5B-SFT \
--reward_model_path Qwen2.5-0.5B-Reward \
--dataset_name trl-internal-testing/descriptiveness-sentiment-trl-style \
--output_dir Qwen2.5-0.5B-PPO \
--learning_rate 3e-6 \
--per_device_train_batch_size 64 \
--total_episodes 10000Step 4: Evaluate
from transformers import pipeline
# Load aligned model
generator = pipeline("text-generation", model="Qwen2.5-0.5B-PPO")
# Test
prompt = "Explain quantum computing to a 10-year-old"
output = generator(prompt, max_length=200)[0]["generated_text"]
print(output)Workflow 2: Simple preference alignment with DPO
Align model with preferences without reward model.
Copy this checklist:
DPO Training:
- [ ] Step 1: Prepare preference dataset
- [ ] Step 2: Configure DPO
- [ ] Step 3: Train with DPOTrainer
- [ ] Step 4: Evaluate alignmentStep 1: Prepare preference dataset
Dataset format:
{
"prompt": "What is the capital of France?",
"chosen": "The capital of France is Paris.",
"rejected": "I don't know."
}Load dataset:
from datasets import load_dataset
dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train")
# Or load your own
# dataset = load_dataset("json", data_files="preferences.json")Step 2: Configure DPO
from trl import DPOConfig
config = DPOConfig(
output_dir="Qwen2.5-0.5B-DPO",
per_device_train_batch_size=4,
num_train_epochs=1,
learning_rate=5e-7,
beta=0.1, # KL penalty strength
max_prompt_length=512,
max_length=1024,
logging_steps=10
)Step 3: Train with DPOTrainer
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from trl import DPOTrainer
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct")
trainer = DPOTrainer(
model=model,
args=config,
train_dataset=dataset,
processing_class=tokenizer
)
trainer.train()
trainer.save_model()CLI alternative:
trl dpo \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct \
--dataset_name argilla/Capybara-Preferences \
--output_dir Qwen2.5-0.5B-DPO \
--per_device_train_batch_size 4 \
--learning_rate 5e-7 \
--beta 0.1Workflow 3: Memory-efficient online RL with GRPO
Train with reinforcement learning using minimal memory.
Copy this checklist:
GRPO Training:
- [ ] Step 1: Define reward function
- [ ] Step 2: Configure GRPO
- [ ] Step 3: Train with GRPOTrainerStep 1: Define reward function
def reward_function(completions, **kwargs):
"""
Compute rewards for completions.
Args:
completions: List of generated texts
Returns:
List of reward scores (floats)
"""
rewards = []
for completion in completions:
# Example: reward based on length and unique words
score = len(completion.split()) # Favor longer responses
score += len(set(completion.lower().split())) # Reward unique words
rewards.append(score)
return rewardsOr use a reward model:
from transformers import pipeline
reward_model = pipeline("text-classification", model="reward-model-path")
def reward_from_model(completions, prompts, **kwargs):
# Combine prompt + completion
full_texts = [p + c for p, c in zip(prompts, completions)]
# Get reward scores
results = reward_model(full_texts)
return [r["score"] for r in results]Step 2: Configure GRPO
from trl import GRPOConfig
config = GRPOConfig(
output_dir="Qwen2-GRPO",
per_device_train_batch_size=4,
num_train_epochs=1,
learning_rate=1e-5,
num_generations=4, # Generate 4 completions per prompt
max_new_tokens=128
)Step 3: Train with GRPOTrainer
from datasets import load_dataset
from trl import GRPOTrainer
# Load prompt-only dataset
dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/tldr", split="train")
trainer = GRPOTrainer(
model="Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct",
reward_funcs=reward_function, # Your reward function
args=config,
train_dataset=dataset
)
trainer.train()CLI:
trl grpo \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct \
--dataset_name trl-lib/tldr \
--output_dir Qwen2-GRPO \
--num_generations 4When to use vs alternatives
Use TRL when:
- Need to align model with human preferences
- Have preference data (chosen/rejected pairs)
- Want to use reinforcement learning (PPO, GRPO)
- Need reward model training
- Doing RLHF (full pipeline)
Method selection:
- SFT: Have prompt-completion pairs, want basic instruction following
- DPO: Have preferences, want simple alignment (no reward model needed)
- PPO: Have reward model, need maximum control over RL
- GRPO: Memory-constrained, want online RL
- Reward Model: Building RLHF pipeline, need to score generations
Use alternatives instead:
- HuggingFace Trainer: Basic fine-tuning without RL
- Axolotl: YAML-based training configuration
- LitGPT: Educational, minimal fine-tuning
- Unsloth: Fast LoRA training
Common issues
Issue: OOM during DPO training
Reduce batch size and sequence length:
config = DPOConfig(
per_device_train_batch_size=1, # Reduce from 4
max_length=512, # Reduce from 1024
gradient_accumulation_steps=8 # Maintain effective batch
)Or use gradient checkpointing:
model.gradient_checkpointing_enable()Issue: Poor alignment quality
Tune beta parameter:
# Higher beta = more conservative (stays closer to reference)
config = DPOConfig(beta=0.5) # Default 0.1
# Lower beta = more aggressive alignment
config = DPOConfig(beta=0.01)Issue: Reward model not learning
Check loss type and learning rate:
config = RewardConfig(
learning_rate=1e-5, # Try different LR
num_train_epochs=3 # Train longer
)Ensure preference dataset has clear winners:
# Verify dataset
print(dataset[0])
# Should have clear chosen > rejectedIssue: PPO training unstable
Adjust KL coefficient:
config = PPOConfig(
kl_coef=0.1, # Increase from 0.05
cliprange=0.1 # Reduce from 0.2
)Advanced topics
SFT training guide: See references/sft-training.md for dataset formats, chat templates, packing strategies, and multi-GPU training.
DPO variants: See references/dpo-variants.md for IPO, cDPO, RPO, and other DPO loss functions with recommended hyperparameters.
Reward modeling: See references/reward-modeling.md for outcome vs process rewards, Bradley-Terry loss, and reward model evaluation.
Online RL methods: See references/online-rl.md for PPO, GRPO, RLOO, and OnlineDPO with detailed configurations.
Hardware requirements
- GPU: NVIDIA (CUDA required)
- VRAM: Depends on model and method
- SFT 7B: 16GB (with LoRA)
- DPO 7B: 24GB (stores reference model)
- PPO 7B: 40GB (policy + reward model)
- GRPO 7B: 24GB (more memory efficient)
- Multi-GPU: Supported via
accelerate - Mixed precision: BF16 recommended (A100/H100)
Memory optimization:
- Use LoRA/QLoRA for all methods
- Enable gradient checkpointing
- Use smaller batch sizes with gradient accumulation
Resources
- Docs: https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/
- GitHub: https://github.com/huggingface/trl
- Papers:
- "Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback" (InstructGPT, 2022)
- "Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model" (DPO, 2023)
- "Group Relative Policy Optimization" (GRPO, 2024)
- Examples: https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/scripts
DPO Variants
Complete guide to Direct Preference Optimization loss variants in TRL.
Overview
DPO optimizes models using preference data (chosen/rejected pairs). TRL supports 10+ loss variants for different scenarios.
Loss Types
1. Sigmoid (Standard DPO)
Formula: -log(sigmoid(β * logits))
When to use: Default choice, general preference alignment
Config:
DPOConfig(
loss_type="sigmoid",
beta=0.1, # KL penalty
per_device_train_batch_size=64,
learning_rate=1e-6
)2. IPO (Identity Policy Optimization)
Formula: (logits - 1/(2β))²
When to use: Better theoretical foundation, reduce overfitting
Config:
DPOConfig(
loss_type="ipo",
beta=0.1,
per_device_train_batch_size=90,
learning_rate=1e-2
)3. Hinge (SLiC)
Formula: ReLU(1 - β * logits)
When to use: Margin-based objective
Config:
DPOConfig(
loss_type="hinge",
beta=0.1,
per_device_train_batch_size=512,
learning_rate=1e-4
)4. Robust DPO
Formula: Sigmoid with label smoothing for noise robustness
When to use: Noisy preference labels
Config:
DPOConfig(
loss_type="robust",
beta=0.01,
label_smoothing=0.1, # Noise probability
per_device_train_batch_size=16,
learning_rate=1e-3,
max_prompt_length=128,
max_length=512
)5. BCO Pair (Binary Classification)
Formula: Train binary classifier (chosen=1, rejected=0)
When to use: Pairwise preference data
Config:
DPOConfig(
loss_type="bco_pair",
beta=0.01,
per_device_train_batch_size=128,
learning_rate=5e-7,
max_prompt_length=1536,
max_completion_length=512
)6. SPPO Hard
Formula: Push chosen→0.5, rejected→-0.5
When to use: Nash equilibrium, sparse data
Config:
DPOConfig(
loss_type="sppo_hard",
beta=0.1
)7. DiscoPOP
Formula: Log-Ratio Modulated Loss
When to use: Automated loss discovery
Config:
DPOConfig(
loss_type="discopop",
beta=0.05,
discopop_tau=0.05,
per_device_train_batch_size=64,
learning_rate=5e-7
)8. APO Zero
Formula: Increase chosen, decrease rejected likelihood
When to use: Model worse than winning outputs
Config:
DPOConfig(
loss_type="apo_zero",
beta=0.1,
per_device_train_batch_size=64,
learning_rate=2e-7,
max_prompt_length=512,
max_completion_length=512
)9. APO Down
Formula: Decrease both, emphasize rejected reduction
When to use: Model better than winning outputs
Config:
DPOConfig(
loss_type="apo_down",
beta=0.1,
# Same hyperparameters as apo_zero
)10. AOT & AOT Pair
Formula: Distributional alignment via stochastic dominance
When to use:
aot_pair: Paired preference dataaot: Unpaired data
Config:
DPOConfig(
loss_type="aot_pair", # or "aot"
beta=0.1,
label_smoothing=0.0
)Multi-Loss Training
Combine multiple losses:
DPOConfig(
loss_type=["sigmoid", "ipo"],
loss_weights=[0.7, 0.3], # Weighted combination
beta=0.1
)Key Parameters
Beta (β)
Controls deviation from reference model:
- Higher (0.5): More conservative, stays close to reference
- Lower (0.01): More aggressive alignment
- Default: 0.1
Label Smoothing
For robust DPO:
- 0.0: No smoothing (default)
- 0.1-0.3: Moderate noise robustness
- 0.5: Maximum noise tolerance
Max Lengths
max_prompt_length: 128-1536max_completion_length: 128-512max_length: Total sequence (1024-2048)
Comparison Table
| Loss | Speed | Stability | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sigmoid | Fast | Good | General use |
| IPO | Fast | Better | Overfitting issues |
| Hinge | Fast | Good | Margin objectives |
| Robust | Fast | Best | Noisy data |
| BCO | Medium | Good | Binary classification |
| DiscoPOP | Fast | Good | New architectures |
| APO | Fast | Good | Model quality matching |
References
- DPO paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18290
- IPO paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12036
- TRL docs: https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/dpo_trainer
Online RL Methods
Guide to online reinforcement learning with PPO, GRPO, RLOO, and OnlineDPO.
Overview
Online RL generates completions during training and optimizes based on rewards.
PPO (Proximal Policy Optimization)
Classic RL algorithm for LLM alignment.
Basic Usage
python -m trl.scripts.ppo \
--model_name_or_path Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct \
--reward_model_path reward-model \
--dataset_name trl-internal-testing/descriptiveness-sentiment-trl-style \
--output_dir model-ppo \
--learning_rate 3e-6 \
--per_device_train_batch_size 64 \
--total_episodes 10000 \
--num_ppo_epochs 4 \
--kl_coef 0.05Key Parameters
kl_coef: KL penalty (0.05-0.2)num_ppo_epochs: Epochs per batch (2-4)cliprange: PPO clip (0.1-0.3)vf_coef: Value function coef (0.1)
GRPO (Group Relative Policy Optimization)
Memory-efficient online RL.
Basic Usage
from trl import GRPOTrainer, GRPOConfig
from datasets import load_dataset
# Define reward function
def reward_func(completions, **kwargs):
return [len(set(c.split())) for c in completions]
config = GRPOConfig(
output_dir="model-grpo",
num_generations=4, # Completions per prompt
max_new_tokens=128
)
trainer = GRPOTrainer(
model="Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct",
reward_funcs=reward_func,
args=config,
train_dataset=load_dataset("trl-lib/tldr", split="train")
)
trainer.train()Key Parameters
num_generations: 2-8 completionsmax_new_tokens: 64-256- Learning rate: 1e-5 to 1e-4
Memory Comparison
| Method | Memory (7B) | Speed | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| PPO | 40GB | Medium | Maximum control |
| GRPO | 24GB | Fast | Memory-constrained |
| OnlineDPO | 28GB | Fast | No reward model |
References
- PPO paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06347
- GRPO paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03300
- TRL docs: https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/
Reward Modeling
Guide to training reward models with TRL for RLHF pipelines.
Overview
Reward models score completions based on human preferences. Used in:
- PPO training (RL feedback)
- GRPO online RL
- Completion ranking
Basic Training
from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification, AutoTokenizer
from trl import RewardTrainer, RewardConfig
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load model (num_labels=1 for single reward score)
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(
"Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct",
num_labels=1
)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct")
# Load preference dataset (chosen/rejected pairs)
dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/ultrafeedback_binarized", split="train")
# Configure
config = RewardConfig(
output_dir="Qwen2.5-Reward",
per_device_train_batch_size=2,
num_train_epochs=1,
learning_rate=1e-5
)
# Train
trainer = RewardTrainer(
model=model,
args=config,
processing_class=tokenizer,
train_dataset=dataset
)
trainer.train()Dataset Format
Required fields:
{
"prompt": "Question or instruction",
"chosen": "Better response",
"rejected": "Worse response"
}Bradley-Terry Loss
Default loss function:
loss = -log(sigmoid(reward_chosen - reward_rejected))Learns to score chosen > rejected.
Using Reward Models
Inference
from transformers import pipeline
# Load trained reward model
reward_pipe = pipeline("text-classification", model="Qwen2.5-Reward")
# Score completions
texts = ["Good answer", "Bad answer"]
scores = reward_pipe(texts)
print(scores) # Higher score = betterIn PPO
from trl import PPOTrainer, PPOConfig
config = PPOConfig(
reward_model_path="Qwen2.5-Reward" # Use trained reward model
)
trainer = PPOTrainer(
model=policy_model,
config=config,
# Reward model loaded automatically
)Hyperparameters
| Model Size | Learning Rate | Batch Size | Epochs |
|---|---|---|---|
| <1B | 2e-5 | 4-8 | 1-2 |
| 1-7B | 1e-5 | 2-4 | 1 |
| 7-13B | 5e-6 | 1-2 | 1 |
Evaluation
Check reward separation:
# Chosen should score higher than rejected
chosen_rewards = model(**chosen_inputs).logits
rejected_rewards = model(**rejected_inputs).logits
accuracy = (chosen_rewards > rejected_rewards).float().mean()
print(f"Accuracy: {accuracy:.2%}") # Target: >80%References
- InstructGPT paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02155
- TRL docs: https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/reward_trainer
SFT Training Guide
Complete guide to Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with TRL for instruction tuning and task-specific fine-tuning.
Overview
SFT trains models on input-output pairs to minimize cross-entropy loss. Use for:
- Instruction following
- Task-specific fine-tuning
- Chatbot training
- Domain adaptation
Dataset Formats
Format 1: Prompt-Completion
[
{
"prompt": "What is the capital of France?",
"completion": "The capital of France is Paris."
}
]Format 2: Conversational (ChatML)
[
{
"messages": [
{"role": "user", "content": "What is Python?"},
{"role": "assistant", "content": "Python is a programming language."}
]
}
]Format 3: Text-only
[
{"text": "User: Hello\nAssistant: Hi! How can I help?"}
]Basic Training
from trl import SFTTrainer, SFTConfig
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load model
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B")
# Load dataset
dataset = load_dataset("trl-lib/Capybara", split="train")
# Configure
config = SFTConfig(
output_dir="Qwen2.5-SFT",
per_device_train_batch_size=4,
num_train_epochs=1,
learning_rate=2e-5,
save_strategy="epoch"
)
# Train
trainer = SFTTrainer(
model=model,
args=config,
train_dataset=dataset,
tokenizer=tokenizer
)
trainer.train()Chat Templates
Apply chat templates automatically:
trainer = SFTTrainer(
model=model,
args=config,
train_dataset=dataset, # Messages format
tokenizer=tokenizer
# Chat template applied automatically
)Or manually:
def format_chat(example):
messages = example["messages"]
text = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, tokenize=False)
return {"text": text}
dataset = dataset.map(format_chat)Packing for Efficiency
Pack multiple sequences into one to maximize GPU utilization:
config = SFTConfig(
packing=True, # Enable packing
max_seq_length=2048,
dataset_text_field="text"
)Benefits: 2-3× faster training Trade-off: Slightly more complex batching
Multi-GPU Training
accelerate launch --num_processes 4 train_sft.pyOr with config:
config = SFTConfig(
output_dir="model-sft",
per_device_train_batch_size=4,
gradient_accumulation_steps=4,
num_train_epochs=1
)LoRA Fine-Tuning
from peft import LoraConfig
lora_config = LoraConfig(
r=16,
lora_alpha=32,
target_modules="all-linear",
lora_dropout=0.05,
task_type="CAUSAL_LM"
)
trainer = SFTTrainer(
model=model,
args=config,
train_dataset=dataset,
peft_config=lora_config # Add LoRA
)Hyperparameters
| Model Size | Learning Rate | Batch Size | Epochs |
|---|---|---|---|
| <1B | 5e-5 | 8-16 | 1-3 |
| 1-7B | 2e-5 | 4-8 | 1-2 |
| 7-13B | 1e-5 | 2-4 | 1 |
| 13B+ | 5e-6 | 1-2 | 1 |
References
- TRL docs: https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/sft_trainer
- Examples: https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/scripts
Related skills
How it compares
Use when you need TRL-specific DPO loss selection rather than generic RLHF or SFT-only guides.
FAQ
What DPO loss types does TRL support?
fine-tuning-with-trl catalogs 10+ TRL DPO loss variants, including sigmoid (standard DPO), IPO, hinge, robust, and BCO. Each entry includes the loss formula, recommended scenarios, and a DPOConfig Python example with beta and batch settings.
When should developers use IPO over sigmoid DPO?
fine-tuning-with-trl recommends IPO (Identity Policy Optimization) when a stronger theoretical foundation or reduced overfitting is needed versus standard sigmoid DPO. The skill provides the IPO formula and a ready DPOConfig block with loss_type set to ipo.
Is Fine Tuning With Trl safe to install?
skills.sh reports 2 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.