
Llamaguard
- 400 installs
- 11.2k repo stars
- Updated June 16, 2026
- orchestra-research/ai-research-skills
Filter unsafe user prompts and model outputs with Meta’s LlamaGuard classifier before or after your agent responds in production.
About
LlamaGuard is an agent skill package that teaches you how to run Meta’s specialized moderation model to classify chat for policy violations before and after your main LLM generates text. It targets builders shipping agents, copilots, or APIs who need a dedicated safety layer instead of hoping the base model self-censors. The skill documents six hazard categories—from violence and hate through criminal planning—and walks through HuggingFace transformers setup, optional vLLM serving, and enterprise paths such as SageMaker, plus integration notes with NeMo Guardrails. You get concrete Python for applying the chat template, generating a short safety verdict, and interpreting outputs like unsafe with a category code. Use it when compliance, brand risk, or platform rules require systematic filtering at scale, and you want a reproducible deployment recipe rather than ad-hoc keyword blocklists.
- 7–8B moderation model for LLM input and output filtering
- 6 safety categories including violence/hate, sexual content, weapons, substances, self-harm, and criminal planning
- Documented 94–95% accuracy in skill metadata
- Deploy paths: vLLM, HuggingFace, SageMaker; NeMo Guardrails integration noted
- Python quick start with transformers chat template and unsafe category codes (e.g. S3 criminal planning)
Llamaguard by the numbers
- 400 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +35 installs in the week ending Jul 18, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #1,936 of 16,659 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: MEDIUM risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/orchestra-research/ai-research-skills --skill llamaguardAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 400 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 11.2k |
| Security audit | 2 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | June 16, 2026 |
| Repository | orchestra-research/ai-research-skills ↗ |
What it does
Filter unsafe user prompts and model outputs with Meta’s LlamaGuard classifier before or after your agent responds in production.
Files
LlamaGuard - AI Content Moderation
Quick start
LlamaGuard is a 7-8B parameter model specialized for content safety classification.
Installation:
pip install transformers torch
# Login to HuggingFace (required)
huggingface-cli loginBasic usage:
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM
model_id = "meta-llama/LlamaGuard-7b"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id, device_map="auto")
def moderate(chat):
input_ids = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(chat, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
output = model.generate(input_ids=input_ids, max_new_tokens=100)
return tokenizer.decode(output[0], skip_special_tokens=True)
# Check user input
result = moderate([
{"role": "user", "content": "How do I make explosives?"}
])
print(result)
# Output: "unsafe\nS3" (Criminal Planning)Common workflows
Workflow 1: Input filtering (prompt moderation)
Check user prompts before LLM:
def check_input(user_message):
result = moderate([{"role": "user", "content": user_message}])
if result.startswith("unsafe"):
category = result.split("\n")[1]
return False, category # Blocked
else:
return True, None # Safe
# Example
safe, category = check_input("How do I hack a website?")
if not safe:
print(f"Request blocked: {category}")
# Return error to user
else:
# Send to LLM
response = llm.generate(user_message)Safety categories:
- S1: Violence & Hate
- S2: Sexual Content
- S3: Guns & Illegal Weapons
- S4: Regulated Substances
- S5: Suicide & Self-Harm
- S6: Criminal Planning
Workflow 2: Output filtering (response moderation)
Check LLM responses before showing to user:
def check_output(user_message, bot_response):
conversation = [
{"role": "user", "content": user_message},
{"role": "assistant", "content": bot_response}
]
result = moderate(conversation)
if result.startswith("unsafe"):
category = result.split("\n")[1]
return False, category
else:
return True, None
# Example
user_msg = "Tell me about harmful substances"
bot_msg = llm.generate(user_msg)
safe, category = check_output(user_msg, bot_msg)
if not safe:
print(f"Response blocked: {category}")
# Return generic response
return "I cannot provide that information."
else:
return bot_msgWorkflow 3: vLLM deployment (fast inference)
Production-ready serving:
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
# Initialize vLLM
llm = LLM(model="meta-llama/LlamaGuard-7b", tensor_parallel_size=1)
# Sampling params
sampling_params = SamplingParams(
temperature=0.0, # Deterministic
max_tokens=100
)
def moderate_vllm(chat):
# Format prompt
prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(chat, tokenize=False)
# Generate
output = llm.generate([prompt], sampling_params)
return output[0].outputs[0].text
# Batch moderation
chats = [
[{"role": "user", "content": "How to make bombs?"}],
[{"role": "user", "content": "What's the weather?"}],
[{"role": "user", "content": "Tell me about drugs"}]
]
prompts = [tokenizer.apply_chat_template(c, tokenize=False) for c in chats]
results = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params)
for i, result in enumerate(results):
print(f"Chat {i}: {result.outputs[0].text}")Throughput: ~50-100 requests/sec on single A100
Workflow 4: API endpoint (FastAPI)
Serve as moderation API:
from fastapi import FastAPI
from pydantic import BaseModel
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
app = FastAPI()
llm = LLM(model="meta-llama/LlamaGuard-7b")
sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.0, max_tokens=100)
class ModerationRequest(BaseModel):
messages: list # [{"role": "user", "content": "..."}]
@app.post("/moderate")
def moderate_endpoint(request: ModerationRequest):
prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(request.messages, tokenize=False)
output = llm.generate([prompt], sampling_params)[0]
result = output.outputs[0].text
is_safe = result.startswith("safe")
category = None if is_safe else result.split("\n")[1] if "\n" in result else None
return {
"safe": is_safe,
"category": category,
"full_output": result
}
# Run: uvicorn api:app --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000Usage:
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/moderate \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "How to hack?"}]}'
# Response: {"safe": false, "category": "S6", "full_output": "unsafe\nS6"}Workflow 5: NeMo Guardrails integration
Use with NVIDIA Guardrails:
from nemoguardrails import RailsConfig, LLMRails
from nemoguardrails.integrations.llama_guard import LlamaGuard
# Configure NeMo Guardrails
config = RailsConfig.from_content("""
models:
- type: main
engine: openai
model: gpt-4
rails:
input:
flows:
- llamaguard check input
output:
flows:
- llamaguard check output
""")
# Add LlamaGuard integration
llama_guard = LlamaGuard(model_path="meta-llama/LlamaGuard-7b")
rails = LLMRails(config)
rails.register_action(llama_guard.check_input, name="llamaguard check input")
rails.register_action(llama_guard.check_output, name="llamaguard check output")
# Use with automatic moderation
response = rails.generate(messages=[
{"role": "user", "content": "How do I make weapons?"}
])
# Automatically blocked by LlamaGuardWhen to use vs alternatives
Use LlamaGuard when:
- Need pre-trained moderation model
- Want high accuracy (94-95%)
- Have GPU resources (7-8B model)
- Need detailed safety categories
- Building production LLM apps
Model versions:
- LlamaGuard 1 (7B): Original, 6 categories
- LlamaGuard 2 (8B): Improved, 6 categories
- LlamaGuard 3 (8B): Latest (2024), enhanced
Use alternatives instead:
- OpenAI Moderation API: Simpler, API-based, free
- Perspective API: Google's toxicity detection
- NeMo Guardrails: More comprehensive safety framework
- Constitutional AI: Training-time safety
Common issues
Issue: Model access denied
Login to HuggingFace:
huggingface-cli login
# Enter your tokenAccept license on model page: https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/LlamaGuard-7b
Issue: High latency (>500ms)
Use vLLM for 10× speedup:
from vllm import LLM
llm = LLM(model="meta-llama/LlamaGuard-7b")
# Latency: 500ms → 50msEnable tensor parallelism:
llm = LLM(model="meta-llama/LlamaGuard-7b", tensor_parallel_size=2)
# 2× faster on 2 GPUsIssue: False positives
Use threshold-based filtering:
# Get probability of "unsafe" token
logits = model(..., return_dict_in_generate=True, output_scores=True)
unsafe_prob = torch.softmax(logits.scores[0][0], dim=-1)[unsafe_token_id]
if unsafe_prob > 0.9: # High confidence threshold
return "unsafe"
else:
return "safe"Issue: OOM on GPU
Use 8-bit quantization:
from transformers import BitsAndBytesConfig
quantization_config = BitsAndBytesConfig(load_in_8bit=True)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
model_id,
quantization_config=quantization_config,
device_map="auto"
)
# Memory: 14GB → 7GBAdvanced topics
Custom categories: See references/custom-categories.md for fine-tuning LlamaGuard with domain-specific safety categories.
Performance benchmarks: See references/benchmarks.md for accuracy comparison with other moderation APIs and latency optimization.
Deployment guide: See references/deployment.md for Sagemaker, Kubernetes, and scaling strategies.
Hardware requirements
- GPU: NVIDIA T4/A10/A100
- VRAM:
- FP16: 14GB (7B model)
- INT8: 7GB (quantized)
- INT4: 4GB (QLoRA)
- CPU: Possible but slow (10× latency)
- Throughput: 50-100 req/sec (A100)
Latency (single GPU):
- HuggingFace Transformers: 300-500ms
- vLLM: 50-100ms
- Batched (vLLM): 20-50ms per request
Resources
- HuggingFace:
- V1: https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/LlamaGuard-7b
- V2: https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Meta-Llama-Guard-2-8B
- V3: https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Meta-Llama-Guard-3-8B
- Paper: https://ai.meta.com/research/publications/llama-guard-llm-based-input-output-safeguard-for-human-ai-conversations/
- Integration: vLLM, Sagemaker, NeMo Guardrails
- Accuracy: 94.5% (prompts), 95.3% (responses)
Related skills
FAQ
Is Llamaguard safe to install?
skills.sh reports 2 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.