Prioritization Frameworks
- 1.9k installs
- 24.9k repo stars
- Updated July 3, 2026
- phuryn/pm-skills
prioritization-frameworks is a skill that Reference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score, and more. Use when selecting a pri
About
The prioritization-frameworks skill helps with Reference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates - RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score, and more. Use when selecting a prioritization method, comparing frameworks like RICE vs ICE, or learning how different prioritization approaches work. Key workflows include Prioritization Frameworks Reference; Core Principle; Opportunity Score (Dan Olsen, *The Lean Product Playbook*); ICE Framework. Documented capabilities cover **Current value** = Importance × Satisfaction; **Opportunity Score** = Importance × (1 − Satisfaction); **Customer value created** = Importance × (S2 − S1), where S1 = satisfaction before, S2 = satisfaction after; **I** (Impact) = Opportunity Score × Number of Customers affected; **C** (Confidence) = How confident are we? (1-10). Accounts for risk.. Agents should invoke it when users ask about prioritization frameworks or mention triggers defined in the skill frontmatter. Follow the SKILL.md steps, reference files, and output formats rather than improvising outside documented scope.
- Prioritization Frameworks Reference
- Core Principle
- Opportunity Score (Dan Olsen, *The Lean Product Playbook*)
- Current value** = Importance × Satisfaction
- Opportunity Score** = Importance × (1 − Satisfaction)
Prioritization Frameworks by the numbers
- 1,950 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +83 installs in the week ending Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #251 of 3,282 Productivity & Planning skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: LOW risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
prioritization-frameworks capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- prioritization frameworks reference · core principle · opportunity score (dan olsen, *the lean product · current value** = importance × satisfaction · opportunity score** = importance × (1 − satisfac
- Use cases
- planning · research
What prioritization-frameworks says it does
Reference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score, and more. Use when selecting a prior
npx skills add https://github.com/phuryn/pm-skills --skill prioritization-frameworksAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 1.9k |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 24.9k |
| Security audit | 3 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | July 3, 2026 |
| Repository | phuryn/pm-skills ↗ |
How do I apply prioritization-frameworks for prioritization frameworks tasks?
Reference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score, and more. Use when selecting a prior
Who is it for?
Teams using prioritization-frameworks as documented in the skill repository.
Skip if: Tasks outside the prioritization-frameworks scope in SKILL.md.
When should I use this skill?
User mentions prioritization-frameworks, prioritization-frameworks, or related skill triggers.
What you get
Structured guidance and deliverables from the prioritization-frameworks SKILL.md workflow.
- Prioritized backlog rankings
- Framework selection rationale
By the numbers
- Covers 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas and templates
- Includes RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, and Opportunity Score
Files
Prioritization Frameworks Reference
A reference guide to help you select and apply the right prioritization framework for your context.
Core Principle
Never allow customers to design solutions. Prioritize problems (opportunities), not features.
Opportunity Score (Dan Olsen, The Lean Product Playbook)
The recommended framework for prioritizing customer problems.
Survey customers on Importance and Satisfaction for each need (normalize to 0–1 scale).
Three related formulas:
- Current value = Importance × Satisfaction
- Opportunity Score = Importance × (1 − Satisfaction)
- Customer value created = Importance × (S2 − S1), where S1 = satisfaction before, S2 = satisfaction after
High Importance + low Satisfaction = highest Opportunity Score = best opportunities. Plot on an Importance vs Satisfaction chart — upper-left quadrant is the sweet spot. Prioritizes customer problems, not solutions.
ICE Framework
Useful for prioritizing initiatives and ideas. Considers not only value but also risk and economic factors.
- I (Impact) = Opportunity Score × Number of Customers affected
- C (Confidence) = How confident are we? (1-10). Accounts for risk.
- E (Ease) = How easy is it to implement? (1-10). Accounts for economic factors.
Score = I × C × E. Higher = prioritize first.
RICE Framework
Splits ICE's Impact into two separate factors. Useful for larger teams that need more granularity.
- R (Reach) = Number of customers affected
- I (Impact) = Opportunity Score (value per customer)
- C (Confidence) = How confident are we? (0-100%)
- E (Effort) = How much effort to implement? (person-months)
Score = (R × I × C) / E
9 Frameworks Overview
| Framework | Best For | Key Insight |
|---|---|---|
| Eisenhower Matrix | Personal tasks | Urgent vs Important — for individual PM task management |
| Impact vs Effort | Tasks/initiatives | Simple 2×2 — quick triage, not rigorous for strategic decisions |
| Risk vs Reward | Initiatives | Like Impact vs Effort but accounts for uncertainty |
| Opportunity Score | Customer problems | Recommended. Importance × (1 − Satisfaction). Normalize to 0–1. |
| Kano Model | Understanding expectations | Must-be, Performance, Attractive, Indifferent, Reverse. For understanding, not prioritizing. |
| Weighted Decision Matrix | Multi-factor decisions | Assign weights to criteria, score each option. Useful for stakeholder buy-in. |
| ICE | Ideas/initiatives | Impact × Confidence × Ease. Recommended for quick prioritization. |
| RICE | Ideas at scale | (Reach × Impact × Confidence) / Effort. Adds Reach to ICE. |
| MoSCoW | Requirements | Must/Should/Could/Won't. Caution: project management origin. |
Templates
- Opportunity Score intro (PDF)
- Importance vs Satisfaction Template — Dan Olsen (Google Slides)
- ICE Template (Google Sheets)
- RICE Template (Google Sheets)
---
Further Reading
Related skills
Grill MeHave an agent relentlessly pressure-test their plan or design until every decision branch is resolved and shared understanding is reached.691k196kGrill With DocsPressure-test architecture decisions against their live codebase and living documentation before writing production code.585k196k
Lark CalendarLet their coding agents read, create, and manage events inside Lark (Feishu) Calendar directly from natural language instructions.493kLark ImLet their coding agent send instant notifications, post updates, and receive commands directly inside Lark (Feishu) workspaces.493kLark ContactLet their AI coding agents read and write contacts, send messages, and manage user data inside Lark (Feishu).493kLark AttendanceAutomatically fetch and report daily attendance data from Lark (Feishu) into their own tools or agents.493kHow it compares
Choose prioritization-frameworks over generic planning skills when you need a decision guide across multiple scoring methods, not one fixed formula.
FAQ
What does prioritization-frameworks do?
Reference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score, and more. Use when selecting a prioritization method, comparing frameworks l
When should I use prioritization-frameworks?
When you need prioritization frameworks help per SKILL.md.
Is prioritization-frameworks safe to install?
Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.