
Account Handover
- 84 installs
- 58 repo stars
- Updated August 5, 2026
- posthog/skills
account-handover is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building.
About
account-handover is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted coding.
- account-handover
- AI & Agent Building
- AI-coding skill
Account Handover by the numbers
- 84 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +2 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #5,107 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/skills --skill account-handoverAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 84 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 58 |
| Last updated | August 5, 2026 |
| Repository | posthog/skills ↗ |
How do I helps with ai & agent building tasks during AI-assisted development.?
Helps with ai & agent building tasks during AI-assisted development.
Who is it for?
Best when you're working on ai & agent building and need structured help with account handover.
Skip if: Teams with no ai & agent building needs, or anyone wanting a generic chat assistant without this specific workflow.
When should I use this skill?
When you need to helps with ai & agent building tasks during AI-assisted development., or when account-handover is a claude code skill for ai & agent building.
What you get
Structured output aligned to account-handover: account-handover, AI & Agent Building.
Files
Account Handover Notes
Draft a structured handover document when transitioning a PostHog account from one TAM or CSM to another. The document gives the incoming owner everything they need to pick up the account without the customer noticing a gap.
Input: Account name (and optionally: reason for transition, any context the outgoing TAM wants to include)
Core Workflow
1. Ingest context — Read what the TAM provides (account name, transition reason, anything they want to flag) 2. Pull Vitally account data — Account health, contacts, notes, conversations 3. Pull PostHog usage data — Product usage, event volume, feature adoption 4. Pull billing context — Spend breakdown, plan tier, billing trend 5. Synthesize handover document — Compile into the structured format (see Output Format) 6. TAM review — Present the draft for the outgoing TAM to fill in gaps the data can't capture
Step 1: Pull Vitally Account Data
Search for the account and pull everything relevant. Run these in parallel where possible.
1a: Find the Account
Use vitally:find_account_by_name with the account name. If multiple results come back, ask the TAM which one. Then use vitally:get_account_full with detailLevel: "full" on the matching account ID.
1b: Extract Account Metadata
From the account record, pull:
- Account name, external ID (organization_id), creation date
- Health score
- MRR and forecasted MRR
- Plan tier (free, paid, startup program, enterprise)
- Assigned TAM/CSM (the current owner being transitioned from)
- Contract type (monthly vs. annual) and renewal date if applicable
- Key traits: industry, employee count, funding stage
1c: Get Key Contacts
Use vitally:get_account_users on the account ID. For each user, note:
- Name, email, role/title
- Last seen date (but remember Vitally's
lastSeenTimestampcan be stale — PostHog event data is the truth for activity) - Whether they're the org Owner
- Any segments they belong to (indicates which products they use)
Identify these roles from the contact list:
- Champion — the most active user, the one who drives PostHog adoption internally
- Decision-maker — the person who controls budget or signs contracts (often different from the champion)
- Technical lead — the engineer who implemented PostHog and handles the integration
- Day-to-day contact — who the outgoing TAM typically communicates with
If the data doesn't make these roles obvious, mark them as "[TAM to confirm]" in the output. Don't guess.
1d: Get Account History
Use vitally:get_account_notes and vitally:get_account_conversations on the account ID.
From the notes and conversations, build a timeline of key events:
- When onboarding happened
- Any escalations or support issues
- Feature requests the customer raised
- QBRs or business reviews
- Expansion conversations (new products, more seats, plan upgrades)
- Any commitments made by PostHog (discounts, custom features, timelines)
- Recent billing-related support tickets
Pay special attention to the last 90 days. The incoming TAM needs to know what's active right now, not just the full history. Separate recent context from historical context in the output.
1e: Check for Open Issues
Look through recent conversations and notes for anything unresolved:
- Pending support tickets
- Feature requests that were escalated or promised
- Billing disputes or credit requests in progress
- Upcoming renewals or contract negotiations
- Any "I'll get back to you on this" items
Flag every open item clearly. These are the things that will make the transition feel broken if the incoming TAM doesn't know about them.
Step 2: Pull PostHog Usage Data
Run these queries in parallel via the query-run MCP tool. Every query must be scoped to the account's project — pass the organization_id (externalId from Vitally) as the project_id parameter in the query-run tool call so the events table only returns data for that account.
2a: Event Volume Trend (last 90 days, weekly)
SELECT
toStartOfWeek(timestamp) AS week,
count() AS event_count
FROM events
WHERE timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 90 DAY
AND properties.$organization_id = '{externalId}'
GROUP BY week
ORDER BY weekThis shows whether usage is growing, flat, or declining — critical context for the incoming TAM.
2b: Product Adoption — Which Features Are in Use
SELECT event, count() AS cnt
FROM events
WHERE timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 30 DAY
AND properties.$organization_id = '{externalId}'
AND event NOT IN (
'$feature_flag_called',
'$autocapture',
'$web_vitals',
'$dead_click'
)
GROUP BY event
ORDER BY cnt DESC
LIMIT 30Map the top events to PostHog products:
$pageview,insight viewed,dashboard viewed→ Product Analytics$recording_viewed,recording analyzed→ Session Replay$feature_flag_called(excluded from query but check separately if needed) → Feature Flags$ai_generation,$ai_span,$ai_trace→ LLM Analyticserror tracking issue viewed→ Error Trackingsurvey sent,survey shown→ Surveys$exportevents → Data Pipelines
2c: Most Active Users (last 30 days)
SELECT
person.properties.email AS email,
count() AS event_count,
max(timestamp) AS last_active
FROM events
WHERE timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 30 DAY
AND properties.$organization_id = '{externalId}'
AND person.properties.email IS NOT NULL
AND person.properties.email != ''
GROUP BY email
ORDER BY event_count DESC
LIMIT 15Cross-reference with the Vitally contacts from Step 1c. The most active users are who the incoming TAM should build rapport with first.
Step 3: Pull Billing Context
Query the billing report to understand spend patterns.
SELECT date, report
FROM postgres.prod.billing_usagereport
WHERE organization_id = '{externalId}'
ORDER BY date DESC
LIMIT 3From the billing reports, extract:
Current spend breakdown by product (using Vitally forecasted MRR fields as a cross-reference):
product_analytics_forecasted_mrrsession_replay_forecasted_mrrfeature_flags_forecasted_mrrllm_analytics_forecasted_mrrerror_tracking_forecasted_mrrdata_warehouse_forecasted_mrrsurveys_forecasted_mrrenhanced_persons_forecasted_mrr
Spend trend: Compare the last 3 billing reports to classify as growing, flat, or declining.
SDK breakdown (from billing report fields):
web_events_count_in_periodnode_events_count_in_period,python_events_count_in_period,go_events_count_in_periodios_events_count_in_period,android_events_count_in_periodflutter_events_count_in_period,react_native_events_count_in_period
The SDK split tells the incoming TAM what the customer's tech stack looks like without having to ask.
Step 4: Synthesize the Handover Document
Compile everything into the format below. Read references/handover-template.md for the full template with guidance notes.
Sourcing Rules
Every section in the handover document should be clearly sourced:
- [Data] — pulled directly from Vitally, PostHog, or billing. The incoming TAM can trust this.
- [TAM to confirm] — placeholder where the outgoing TAM needs to add context from memory. Leave these as clear prompts, not blank spaces.
- [Inferred] — derived from the data but not explicitly stated. Flag the reasoning so the incoming TAM can validate.
Output Format
Present the handover document with these sections. Use the template from references/handover-template.md as the structure.
1. Account Snapshot
- Company name, what they build, industry
- Employee count, funding stage (if known)
- PostHog plan and MRR
- Health score
- Account age (time since first event or Vitally creation date)
- Contract type and renewal date (if applicable)
- Transition reason (from TAM input)
2. Key Contacts
Table format:
| Name | Role | Last Active | Relationship | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | Champion / Decision-maker / Technical lead / [TAM to confirm] |
Include a note on who the outgoing TAM typically communicated with and through what channel (email, Slack, calls).
3. Product Usage Summary
- Which PostHog products are actively used (with monthly spend per product)
- Event volume trend (growing / flat / declining) with weekly numbers
- SDK breakdown (what's their tech stack)
- Top features and insights they use
4. Billing and Spend
- Current MRR and trend direction
- Spend breakdown by product (table)
- Contract details: monthly vs. annual, renewal date, any discounts or credits
- Billing limits (if set)
- Any pending billing issues or credit requests
5. Account History (Timeline)
Chronological list of key events, split into:
Recent (last 90 days):
- [date] Event description (source: Vitally note/conversation)
Historical:
- [date] Event description
6. Open Items
- Unresolved support tickets
- Pending feature requests
- In-progress conversations
- Commitments made by PostHog (discounts, timelines, custom work)
- Upcoming deadlines (renewals, credit expiry, QBRs)
7. Relationship Context
This section relies heavily on TAM input. Present what the data shows, then leave clear prompts:
- Communication preferences: [TAM to confirm — email, Slack, calls? How often?]
- Meeting cadence: [TAM to confirm — weekly, monthly, ad-hoc?]
- Internal dynamics: [TAM to confirm — who drives decisions? Any internal politics to be aware of?]
- Personality notes: [TAM to confirm — any communication style preferences, pet peeves, things that build rapport?]
- Sensitive topics: [TAM to confirm — past incidents, pricing disputes, anything to handle carefully?]
8. Recommended Next Steps for Incoming TAM
Based on the data, suggest: 1. Intro approach — how to introduce yourself (email, Slack message, or ask the outgoing TAM for a warm intro) 2. First meeting agenda — what to cover in the first conversation (acknowledge the transition, review open items, confirm their priorities) 3. Quick wins — anything the incoming TAM can do immediately to build trust (resolve an open ticket, follow up on a feature request, share a relevant resource) 4. Watch items — things to monitor (declining usage, upcoming renewal, credit expiry, unresolved escalation)
Critical Rules
1. Always pull from Vitally and PostHog. Never generate a handover from memory or assumptions alone. The document should be grounded in real data. 2. Flag data gaps. If the account has no Vitally notes, say so explicitly — that's a gap the outgoing TAM needs to fill before the transition. 3. Mark what needs TAM input. Use [TAM to confirm] for anything the data can't answer. Relationship context, communication preferences, and verbal commitments live in the TAM's head, not in Vitally. 4. Don't fabricate relationship context. If the notes don't mention who the champion is, don't guess. Leave it as a prompt for the TAM. 5. Prioritize recency. The incoming TAM cares most about the last 90 days. Historical context matters but should be secondary. 6. Surface open items prominently. Dropped balls during a transition are the fastest way to lose trust. Every unresolved item should be impossible to miss. 7. Run PostHog queries in parallel to save time. 8. Vitally `lastSeenTimestamp` is unreliable for activity. Always cross-reference with PostHog event data for "last active" dates. 9. If PostHog returns 503 (busy), wait a moment and retry once before giving up on that query.
After Presenting the Draft
Once the handover document is generated, tell the outgoing TAM:
"This is the data-sourced draft. Please review each section — especially Relationship Context and Open Items — and fill in anything marked [TAM to confirm]. Once you've added your notes, this is ready to share with the incoming TAM/CSM."
If the outgoing TAM provides additional context, incorporate it into the document and regenerate the relevant sections.
Account Handover
Draft structured handover notes when transitioning a PostHog account from one TAM or CSM to another.
What it does
Given an account name, the skill pulls data from Vitally (account health, contacts, notes, conversations), PostHog (product usage, event volume, feature adoption), and billing reports (spend breakdown, plan tier, trends). It synthesizes everything into a handover document with clear sections for account context, key contacts, open items, and recommended next steps.
Sections that require human knowledge (relationship dynamics, communication preferences, verbal commitments) are marked with [TAM to confirm] prompts so the outgoing TAM can fill in the gaps before handing off.
When to use
- A TAM is leaving and needs to transition their accounts
- An account is being reassigned to a different TAM or CSM
- A new team member is picking up accounts and needs a briefing
Files
SKILL.md— Skill instructions (agent-consumed)references/handover-template.md— Structured template for the handover document
Account Handover Template
Use this template when generating the handover document. Each section includes guidance on what to include and where the data comes from.
---
1. Account Snapshot
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Company | {company name} |
| What they build | {one-sentence description of their product/service} |
| Industry | {industry} |
| Employees | {count, if known} |
| Funding stage | {seed / Series A / Series B / etc., if known} |
| PostHog plan | {free / paid / startup program / enterprise} |
| MRR | ${amount} |
| Health score | {score}/10 |
| Account age | {time since creation} |
| Contract | {monthly / annual} — renewal {date, if applicable} |
| Transition reason | {from TAM input} |
Source: Vitally `get_account_full`, TAM input for transition reason.
---
2. Key Contacts
| Name | Role/Title | Last Active | Relationship Role | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| {name} | {title} | {email} | {date from PostHog events} | {Champion / Decision-maker / Technical lead / Day-to-day / [TAM to confirm]} |
Primary contact: {name} — {how the outgoing TAM typically communicates with them: email / Slack / calls}
Communication channel: {email / shared Slack channel / scheduled calls / ad-hoc}
Source: Vitally `get_account_users` for contact list, PostHog events for last active dates. Relationship roles should be confirmed by outgoing TAM.
---
3. Product Usage Summary
Active Products
| Product | Monthly Spend | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Product Analytics | ${amount} | {Active / Light use} |
| Session Replay | ${amount} | {Active / Light use} |
| Feature Flags | ${amount} | {Active / Light use} |
| LLM Analytics | ${amount} | {Active / Light use} |
| Error Tracking | ${amount} | {Active / Light use} |
| Surveys | ${amount} | {Active / Light use} |
| Data Warehouse | ${amount} | {Active / Light use} |
Event Volume Trend (last 90 days)
{Include weekly event counts. Classify as: Growing / Flat / Declining.}
| Week | Events |
|---|---|
| {week} | {count} |
Trend: {Growing / Flat / Declining} — {one sentence of context, e.g. "Steady growth of ~10% week-over-week since onboarding" or "Flat at ~50K events/week for the last 3 months"}
SDK Breakdown (Tech Stack)
| SDK | Events/Period | Share |
|---|---|---|
| {sdk name} | {count} | {%} |
Source: PostHog `query-run` for usage data, Vitally forecasted MRR fields for spend, billing report for SDK breakdown.
---
4. Billing and Spend
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Current MRR | ${amount} |
| MRR trend | {Growing / Flat / Declining} |
| Forecasted MRR | ${amount} |
| Contract type | {Monthly / Annual} |
| Renewal date | {date, or N/A for monthly} |
| Billing limits set? | {Yes — ${limit}/month / No} |
| Active discounts or credits | {description, or None} |
| Pending billing issues | {description, or None} |
Spend by Product
| Product | Current Spend | % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| {product} | ${amount}/mo | {%} |
| Total | ${total}/mo | 100% |
Source: Vitally account traits, `postgres.prod.billing_usagereport`.
---
5. Account History
Recent (last 90 days)
- {date} — {event description} (source: {Vitally note / conversation / inferred from data})
Historical
- {date} — {event description} (source: {Vitally note / conversation})
Source: Vitally `get_account_notes` and `get_account_conversations`. If no notes exist, flag: "No Vitally notes found — outgoing TAM should document key history before transition."
---
6. Open Items
List every unresolved item. Each entry should have enough context for the incoming TAM to pick it up without asking the outgoing TAM for clarification.
| Item | Status | Owner | Next Step | Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| {description} | {In progress / Waiting on customer / Waiting on PostHog / Stalled} | {who's responsible} | {what needs to happen next} | {date, if any} |
If no open items are found in the data: "No open items found in Vitally notes/conversations. [TAM to confirm] — are there any verbal commitments, pending requests, or follow-ups in email/Slack that aren't captured in Vitally?"
Source: Vitally notes and conversations, filtered for unresolved items.
---
7. Relationship Context
This section depends on the outgoing TAM's knowledge. Present whatever the data reveals, then leave clear prompts for what's missing.
Communication preferences: {What the data shows, or: [TAM to confirm — does the customer prefer email, Slack, or calls? How responsive are they? Any preferred meeting times?]}
Meeting cadence: {What the data shows, or: [TAM to confirm — regular check-ins? QBRs? Purely ad-hoc?]}
Internal dynamics: [TAM to confirm — who really drives decisions? Are there competing stakeholders? Is there an internal champion for PostHog? Anyone resistant?]
Personality and style: [TAM to confirm — any communication style preferences? Things that build rapport? Topics to avoid?]
Sensitive topics: [TAM to confirm — past incidents, pricing disputes, features they were promised, things they're frustrated about, anything to handle carefully?]
Competitive context: [TAM to confirm — are they evaluating alternatives? Do they use other analytics tools alongside PostHog? Any migration history?]
---
8. Recommended Next Steps
Based on the data, here's what the incoming TAM should do first:
1. Introduction
- {Recommended approach: warm intro from outgoing TAM / direct email / Slack message}
- {Suggested timing: before or after the outgoing TAM's last interaction}
2. First meeting agenda
- Acknowledge the transition openly
- Review open items from Section 6
- Confirm their current priorities and any upcoming milestones
- Ask what's working well and what they'd change about their PostHog experience
3. Quick wins
- {Specific actions: resolve a pending ticket, follow up on a feature request, share a relevant doc or feature announcement}
4. Watch items
- {Things to monitor: declining usage, upcoming renewal, credit expiry, unresolved escalation, team changes at the customer}
Related skills
FAQ
What does account-handover do?
account-handover is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building.
When should I use account-handover?
When you need to helps with ai & agent building tasks during AI-assisted development., or when account-handover is a claude code skill for ai & agent building.
What are the main capabilities?
account-handover; AI & Agent Building; AI-coding skill.