Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
ruvnet avatar

Agentic Jujutsu

  • 1k installs
  • 67k repo stars
  • Updated August 4, 2026
  • ruvnet/ruflo

agentic-jujutsu is a ruflo version-control skill that lets multiple AI agents edit the same codebase simultaneously with lock-free coordination and automatic conflict resolution for developers running parallel agent swar

About

agentic-jujutsu is version 2.3.2 ruflo skill for quantum-resistant, self-learning version control when multiple AI agents modify one repository at once. The README cites lock-free operations at 23x faster than Git and automatic conflict resolution with an 87% success rate, plus ReasoningBank intelligence for pattern learning across sessions. Developers reach for agentic-jujutsu when Git merge queues block parallel agent edits or when swarm workflows need coordinated commits without constant human conflict resolution. The skill targets future-proof multi-agent development pipelines that treat version control as an agent coordination layer.

  • Lock-free version control that is 23x faster than Git
  • Self-learning AI that improves from experience using ReasoningBank
  • Automatic conflict resolution with 87% success rate
  • Quantum-resistant security for future-proof protection
  • Multi-agent coordination with pattern recognition and intelligent suggestions

Agentic Jujutsu by the numbers

  • 1,019 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • +5 installs in the week ending Aug 4, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
  • Ranked #1,026 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Security screen: MEDIUM risk (skills.sh audit)
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo --skill agentic-jujutsu

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs1k
repo stars67k
Security audit2 / 3 scanners passed
Last updatedAugust 4, 2026
Repositoryruvnet/ruflo

How do multiple AI agents edit one repo safely?

Enable multiple AI agents to edit the same codebase simultaneously without merge conflicts or blocking.

Who is it for?

Developers running parallel ruflo agent swarms who hit Git merge bottlenecks and need lock-free multi-agent version control.

Skip if: Single-developer Git workflows or teams that only need standard branch-and-PR merges without agent concurrency.

When should I use this skill?

The user needs multiple agents modifying the same codebase, lock-free version control, or automatic agent conflict resolution in ruflo.

What you get

Lock-free agent commits, coordinated multi-agent edits, resolved merge conflicts, and ReasoningBank-learned version-control patterns.

  • Coordinated agent commits
  • Resolved merge conflicts
  • Learned version-control patterns

By the numbers

  • Version 2.3.2 skill release
  • README cites 23x faster lock-free operations than Git
  • README cites 87% automatic conflict resolution success rate

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Agentic Jujutsu - AI Agent Version Control

Quantum-ready, self-learning version control designed for multiple AI agents working simultaneously without conflicts.

When to Use This Skill

Use agentic-jujutsu when you need:

  • ✅ Multiple AI agents modifying code simultaneously
  • ✅ Lock-free version control (23x faster than Git)
  • ✅ Self-learning AI that improves from experience
  • ✅ Quantum-resistant security for future-proof protection
  • ✅ Automatic conflict resolution (87% success rate)
  • ✅ Pattern recognition and intelligent suggestions
  • ✅ Multi-agent coordination without blocking

Quick Start

Installation

npx agentic-jujutsu

Basic Usage

const { JjWrapper } = require('agentic-jujutsu');

const jj = new JjWrapper();

// Basic operations
await jj.status();
await jj.newCommit('Add feature');
await jj.log(10);

// Self-learning trajectory
const id = jj.startTrajectory('Implement authentication');
await jj.branchCreate('feature$auth');
await jj.newCommit('Add auth');
jj.addToTrajectory();
jj.finalizeTrajectory(0.9, 'Clean implementation');

// Get AI suggestions
const suggestion = JSON.parse(jj.getSuggestion('Add logout feature'));
console.log(`Confidence: ${suggestion.confidence}`);

Core Capabilities

1. Self-Learning with ReasoningBank

Track operations, learn patterns, and get intelligent suggestions:

// Start learning trajectory
const trajectoryId = jj.startTrajectory('Deploy to production');

// Perform operations (automatically tracked)
await jj.execute(['git', 'push', 'origin', 'main']);
await jj.branchCreate('release$v1.0');
await jj.newCommit('Release v1.0');

// Record operations to trajectory
jj.addToTrajectory();

// Finalize with success score (0.0-1.0) and critique
jj.finalizeTrajectory(0.95, 'Deployment successful, no issues');

// Later: Get AI-powered suggestions for similar tasks
const suggestion = JSON.parse(jj.getSuggestion('Deploy to staging'));
console.log('AI Recommendation:', suggestion.reasoning);
console.log('Confidence:', (suggestion.confidence * 100).toFixed(1) + '%');
console.log('Expected Success:', (suggestion.expectedSuccessRate * 100).toFixed(1) + '%');

Validation (v2.3.1):

  • ✅ Tasks must be non-empty (max 10KB)
  • ✅ Success scores must be 0.0-1.0
  • ✅ Must have operations before finalizing
  • ✅ Contexts cannot be empty

2. Pattern Discovery

Automatically identify successful operation sequences:

// Get discovered patterns
const patterns = JSON.parse(jj.getPatterns());

patterns.forEach(pattern => {
    console.log(`Pattern: ${pattern.name}`);
    console.log(`  Success rate: ${(pattern.successRate * 100).toFixed(1)}%`);
    console.log(`  Used ${pattern.observationCount} times`);
    console.log(`  Operations: ${pattern.operationSequence.join(' → ')}`);
    console.log(`  Confidence: ${(pattern.confidence * 100).toFixed(1)}%`);
});

3. Learning Statistics

Track improvement over time:

const stats = JSON.parse(jj.getLearningStats());

console.log('Learning Progress:');
console.log(`  Total trajectories: ${stats.totalTrajectories}`);
console.log(`  Patterns discovered: ${stats.totalPatterns}`);
console.log(`  Average success: ${(stats.avgSuccessRate * 100).toFixed(1)}%`);
console.log(`  Improvement rate: ${(stats.improvementRate * 100).toFixed(1)}%`);
console.log(`  Prediction accuracy: ${(stats.predictionAccuracy * 100).toFixed(1)}%`);

4. Multi-Agent Coordination

Multiple agents work concurrently without conflicts:

// Agent 1: Developer
const dev = new JjWrapper();
dev.startTrajectory('Implement feature');
await dev.newCommit('Add feature X');
dev.addToTrajectory();
dev.finalizeTrajectory(0.85);

// Agent 2: Reviewer (learns from Agent 1)
const reviewer = new JjWrapper();
const suggestion = JSON.parse(reviewer.getSuggestion('Review feature X'));

if (suggestion.confidence > 0.7) {
    console.log('High confidence approach:', suggestion.reasoning);
}

// Agent 3: Tester (benefits from both)
const tester = new JjWrapper();
const similar = JSON.parse(tester.queryTrajectories('test feature', 5));
console.log(`Found ${similar.length} similar test approaches`);

5. Quantum-Resistant Security (v2.3.0+)

Fast integrity verification with quantum-resistant cryptography:

const { generateQuantumFingerprint, verifyQuantumFingerprint } = require('agentic-jujutsu');

// Generate SHA3-512 fingerprint (NIST FIPS 202)
const data = Buffer.from('commit-data');
const fingerprint = generateQuantumFingerprint(data);
console.log('Fingerprint:', fingerprint.toString('hex'));

// Verify integrity (<1ms)
const isValid = verifyQuantumFingerprint(data, fingerprint);
console.log('Valid:', isValid);

// HQC-128 encryption for trajectories
const crypto = require('crypto');
const key = crypto.randomBytes(32).toString('base64');
jj.enableEncryption(key);

6. Operation Tracking with AgentDB

Automatic tracking of all operations:

// Operations are tracked automatically
await jj.status();
await jj.newCommit('Fix bug');
await jj.rebase('main');

// Get operation statistics
const stats = JSON.parse(jj.getStats());
console.log(`Total operations: ${stats.total_operations}`);
console.log(`Success rate: ${(stats.success_rate * 100).toFixed(1)}%`);
console.log(`Avg duration: ${stats.avg_duration_ms.toFixed(2)}ms`);

// Query recent operations
const ops = jj.getOperations(10);
ops.forEach(op => {
    console.log(`${op.operationType}: ${op.command}`);
    console.log(`  Duration: ${op.durationMs}ms, Success: ${op.success}`);
});

// Get user operations (excludes snapshots)
const userOps = jj.getUserOperations(20);

Advanced Use Cases

Use Case 1: Adaptive Workflow Optimization

Learn and improve deployment workflows:

async function adaptiveDeployment(jj, environment) {
    // Get AI suggestion based on past deployments
    const suggestion = JSON.parse(jj.getSuggestion(`Deploy to ${environment}`));
    
    console.log(`Deploying with ${(suggestion.confidence * 100).toFixed(0)}% confidence`);
    console.log(`Expected duration: ${suggestion.estimatedDurationMs}ms`);
    
    // Start tracking
    jj.startTrajectory(`Deploy to ${environment}`);
    
    // Execute recommended operations
    for (const op of suggestion.recommendedOperations) {
        console.log(`Executing: ${op}`);
        await executeOperation(op);
    }
    
    jj.addToTrajectory();
    
    // Record outcome
    const success = await verifyDeployment();
    jj.finalizeTrajectory(
        success ? 0.95 : 0.5,
        success ? 'Deployment successful' : 'Issues detected'
    );
}

Use Case 2: Multi-Agent Code Review

Coordinate review across multiple agents:

async function coordinatedReview(agents) {
    const reviews = await Promise.all(agents.map(async (agent) => {
        const jj = new JjWrapper();
        
        // Start review trajectory
        jj.startTrajectory(`Review by ${agent.name}`);
        
        // Get AI suggestion for review approach
        const suggestion = JSON.parse(jj.getSuggestion('Code review'));
        
        // Perform review
        const diff = await jj.diff('@', '@-');
        const issues = await agent.analyze(diff);
        
        jj.addToTrajectory();
        jj.finalizeTrajectory(
            issues.length === 0 ? 0.9 : 0.6,
            `Found ${issues.length} issues`
        );
        
        return { agent: agent.name, issues, suggestion };
    }));
    
    // Aggregate learning from all agents
    return reviews;
}

Use Case 3: Error Pattern Detection

Learn from failures to prevent future issues:

async function smartMerge(jj, branch) {
    // Query similar merge attempts
    const similar = JSON.parse(jj.queryTrajectories(`merge ${branch}`, 10));
    
    // Analyze past failures
    const failures = similar.filter(t => t.successScore < 0.5);
    
    if (failures.length > 0) {
        console.log('⚠️ Similar merges failed in the past:');
        failures.forEach(f => {
            if (f.critique) {
                console.log(`  - ${f.critique}`);
            }
        });
    }
    
    // Get AI recommendation
    const suggestion = JSON.parse(jj.getSuggestion(`merge ${branch}`));
    
    if (suggestion.confidence < 0.7) {
        console.log('⚠️ Low confidence. Recommended steps:');
        suggestion.recommendedOperations.forEach(op => console.log(`  - ${op}`));
    }
    
    // Execute merge with tracking
    jj.startTrajectory(`Merge ${branch}`);
    try {
        await jj.execute(['merge', branch]);
        jj.addToTrajectory();
        jj.finalizeTrajectory(0.9, 'Merge successful');
    } catch (err) {
        jj.addToTrajectory();
        jj.finalizeTrajectory(0.3, `Merge failed: ${err.message}`);
        throw err;
    }
}

Use Case 4: Continuous Learning Loop

Implement a self-improving agent:

class SelfImprovingAgent {
    constructor() {
        this.jj = new JjWrapper();
    }
    
    async performTask(taskDescription) {
        // Get AI suggestion
        const suggestion = JSON.parse(this.jj.getSuggestion(taskDescription));
        
        console.log(`Task: ${taskDescription}`);
        console.log(`AI Confidence: ${(suggestion.confidence * 100).toFixed(1)}%`);
        console.log(`Expected Success: ${(suggestion.expectedSuccessRate * 100).toFixed(1)}%`);
        
        // Start trajectory
        this.jj.startTrajectory(taskDescription);
        
        // Execute with recommended approach
        const startTime = Date.now();
        let success = false;
        
        try {
            for (const op of suggestion.recommendedOperations) {
                await this.execute(op);
            }
            success = true;
        } catch (err) {
            console.error('Task failed:', err.message);
        }
        
        const duration = Date.now() - startTime;
        
        // Record learning
        this.jj.addToTrajectory();
        this.jj.finalizeTrajectory(
            success ? 0.9 : 0.4,
            success 
                ? `Completed in ${duration}ms using ${suggestion.recommendedOperations.length} operations`
                : `Failed after ${duration}ms`
        );
        
        // Check improvement
        const stats = JSON.parse(this.jj.getLearningStats());
        console.log(`Improvement rate: ${(stats.improvementRate * 100).toFixed(1)}%`);
        
        return success;
    }
    
    async execute(operation) {
        // Execute operation logic
    }
}

// Usage
const agent = new SelfImprovingAgent();

// Agent improves over time
for (let i = 1; i <= 10; i++) {
    console.log(`\n--- Attempt ${i} ---`);
    await agent.performTask('Deploy application');
}

API Reference

Core Methods

MethodDescriptionReturns
new JjWrapper()Create wrapper instanceJjWrapper
status()Get repository statusPromise<JjResult>
newCommit(msg)Create new commitPromise<JjResult>
log(limit)Show commit historyPromise<JjCommit[]>
diff(from, to)Show differencesPromise<JjDiff>
branchCreate(name, rev?)Create branchPromise<JjResult>
rebase(source, dest)Rebase commitsPromise<JjResult>

ReasoningBank Methods

MethodDescriptionReturns
startTrajectory(task)Begin learning trajectorystring (trajectory ID)
addToTrajectory()Add recent operationsvoid
finalizeTrajectory(score, critique?)Complete trajectory (score: 0.0-1.0)void
getSuggestion(task)Get AI recommendationJSON: DecisionSuggestion
getLearningStats()Get learning metricsJSON: LearningStats
getPatterns()Get discovered patternsJSON: Pattern[]
queryTrajectories(task, limit)Find similar trajectoriesJSON: Trajectory[]
resetLearning()Clear learned datavoid

AgentDB Methods

MethodDescriptionReturns
getStats()Get operation statisticsJSON: Stats
getOperations(limit)Get recent operationsJjOperation[]
getUserOperations(limit)Get user operations onlyJjOperation[]
clearLog()Clear operation logvoid

Quantum Security Methods (v2.3.0+)

MethodDescriptionReturns
generateQuantumFingerprint(data)Generate SHA3-512 fingerprintBuffer (64 bytes)
verifyQuantumFingerprint(data, fp)Verify fingerprintboolean
enableEncryption(key, pubKey?)Enable HQC-128 encryptionvoid
disableEncryption()Disable encryptionvoid
isEncryptionEnabled()Check encryption statusboolean

Performance Characteristics

MetricGitAgentic Jujutsu
Concurrent commits15 ops$s350 ops$s (23x)
Context switching500-1000ms50-100ms (10x)
Conflict resolution30-40% auto87% auto (2.5x)
Lock waiting50 min$day0 min (∞)
Quantum fingerprintsN/A<1ms

Best Practices

1. Trajectory Management

// ✅ Good: Meaningful task descriptions
jj.startTrajectory('Implement user authentication with JWT');

// ❌ Bad: Vague descriptions
jj.startTrajectory('fix stuff');

// ✅ Good: Honest success scores
jj.finalizeTrajectory(0.7, 'Works but needs refactoring');

// ❌ Bad: Always 1.0
jj.finalizeTrajectory(1.0, 'Perfect!'); // Prevents learning

2. Pattern Recognition

// ✅ Good: Let patterns emerge naturally
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
    jj.startTrajectory('Deploy feature');
    await deploy();
    jj.addToTrajectory();
    jj.finalizeTrajectory(wasSuccessful ? 0.9 : 0.5);
}

// ❌ Bad: Not recording outcomes
await deploy(); // No learning

3. Multi-Agent Coordination

// ✅ Good: Concurrent operations
const agents = ['agent1', 'agent2', 'agent3'];
await Promise.all(agents.map(async (agent) => {
    const jj = new JjWrapper();
    // Each agent works independently
    await jj.newCommit(`Changes by ${agent}`);
}));

// ❌ Bad: Sequential with locks
for (const agent of agents) {
    await agent.waitForLock(); // Not needed!
    await agent.commit();
}

4. Error Handling

// ✅ Good: Record failures with details
try {
    await jj.execute(['complex-operation']);
    jj.finalizeTrajectory(0.9);
} catch (err) {
    jj.finalizeTrajectory(0.3, `Failed: ${err.message}. Root cause: ...`);
}

// ❌ Bad: Silent failures
try {
    await jj.execute(['operation']);
} catch (err) {
    // No learning from failure
}

Validation Rules (v2.3.1+)

Task Description

  • ✅ Cannot be empty or whitespace-only
  • ✅ Maximum length: 10,000 bytes
  • ✅ Automatically trimmed

Success Score

  • ✅ Must be finite (not NaN or Infinity)
  • ✅ Must be between 0.0 and 1.0 (inclusive)

Operations

  • ✅ Must have at least one operation before finalizing

Context

  • ✅ Cannot be empty
  • ✅ Keys cannot be empty or whitespace-only
  • ✅ Keys max 1,000 bytes, values max 10,000 bytes

Troubleshooting

Issue: Low Confidence Suggestions

const suggestion = JSON.parse(jj.getSuggestion('new task'));

if (suggestion.confidence < 0.5) {
    // Not enough data - check learning stats
    const stats = JSON.parse(jj.getLearningStats());
    console.log(`Need more data. Current trajectories: ${stats.totalTrajectories}`);
    
    // Recommend: Record 5-10 trajectories first
}

Issue: Validation Errors

try {
    jj.startTrajectory(''); // Empty task
} catch (err) {
    if (err.message.includes('Validation error')) {
        console.log('Invalid input:', err.message);
        // Use non-empty, meaningful task description
    }
}

try {
    jj.finalizeTrajectory(1.5); // Score > 1.0
} catch (err) {
    // Use score between 0.0 and 1.0
    jj.finalizeTrajectory(Math.max(0, Math.min(1, score)));
}

Issue: No Patterns Discovered

const patterns = JSON.parse(jj.getPatterns());

if (patterns.length === 0) {
    // Need more trajectories with >70% success
    // Record at least 3-5 successful trajectories
}

Examples

Example 1: Simple Learning Workflow

const { JjWrapper } = require('agentic-jujutsu');

async function learnFromWork() {
    const jj = new JjWrapper();
    
    // Start tracking
    jj.startTrajectory('Add user profile feature');
    
    // Do work
    await jj.branchCreate('feature$user-profile');
    await jj.newCommit('Add user profile model');
    await jj.newCommit('Add profile API endpoints');
    await jj.newCommit('Add profile UI');
    
    // Record operations
    jj.addToTrajectory();
    
    // Finalize with result
    jj.finalizeTrajectory(0.85, 'Feature complete, minor styling issues remain');
    
    // Next time, get suggestions
    const suggestion = JSON.parse(jj.getSuggestion('Add settings page'));
    console.log('AI suggests:', suggestion.reasoning);
}

Example 2: Multi-Agent Swarm

async function agentSwarm(taskList) {
    const agents = taskList.map((task, i) => ({
        name: `agent-${i}`,
        jj: new JjWrapper(),
        task
    }));
    
    // All agents work concurrently (no conflicts!)
    const results = await Promise.all(agents.map(async (agent) => {
        agent.jj.startTrajectory(agent.task);
        
        // Get AI suggestion
        const suggestion = JSON.parse(agent.jj.getSuggestion(agent.task));
        
        // Execute task
        const success = await executeTask(agent, suggestion);
        
        agent.jj.addToTrajectory();
        agent.jj.finalizeTrajectory(success ? 0.9 : 0.5);
        
        return { agent: agent.name, success };
    }));
    
    console.log('Results:', results);
}

Related Documentation

  • NPM Package: https:/$npmjs.com$package$agentic-jujutsu
  • GitHub: https:/$github.com$ruvnet$agentic-flow$tree$main$packages$agentic-jujutsu
  • Full README: See package README.md
  • Validation Guide: docs/VALIDATION_FIXES_v2.3.1.md
  • AgentDB Guide: docs/AGENTDB_GUIDE.md

Version History

  • v2.3.2 - Documentation updates
  • v2.3.1 - Validation fixes for ReasoningBank
  • v2.3.0 - Quantum-resistant security with @qudag$napi-core
  • v2.1.0 - Self-learning AI with ReasoningBank
  • v2.0.0 - Zero-dependency installation with embedded jj binary

---

Status: ✅ Production Ready License: MIT Maintained: Active

Related skills

How it compares

Use agentic-jujutsu when parallel agents need lock-free coordination; stay on standard Git skills for single-threaded human branch workflows.

FAQ

What problem does agentic-jujutsu solve?

agentic-jujutsu solves concurrent edit conflicts when multiple AI agents modify the same codebase. It provides lock-free version control and automatic conflict resolution so agent swarms do not block on traditional Git merge queues.

How fast is agentic-jujutsu compared to Git?

agentic-jujutsu README states lock-free version control runs 23x faster than Git for multi-agent workflows. Automatic conflict resolution succeeds in 87% of cases according to the skill documentation.

What version is agentic-jujutsu?

agentic-jujutsu skill metadata lists version 2.3.2. The skill adds ReasoningBank self-learning intelligence and quantum-resistant security positioning for AI agent version control inside ruflo.

Is Agentic Jujutsu safe to install?

skills.sh reports 2 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.

AI & Agent Buildingagentsautomation

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.