Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
samber avatar

Golang Security

  • 34.8k installs
  • 2.8k repo stars
  • Updated July 27, 2026
  • samber/cc-skills-golang

golang-security is an agent skill for Go security audits, PR reviews, and secure coding across injection, crypto, filesystem, network, and secrets domains.

About

The golang-security skill from samber cc-skills-golang v1.1.8 applies senior Go security engineering across review, audit, and coding modes. Review mode traces changed files and data flows from PR diffs. Audit mode launches up to five parallel sub-agents for injection, cryptography, web security, authentication, and concurrency domains, then aggregates DREAD-scored findings. Coding mode follows sequential guidance while optionally grepping new code for vulnerability patterns. It teaches defense in depth with trust-boundary questions, STRIDE threat modeling, and severity tables aligned to DREAD scores from critical RCE down to low info disclosure. Quick reference maps SQL injection to database/sql placeholders, command injection to exec.Command args, XSS to html/template, and path traversal to os.Root or filepath checks. Detailed reference files cover cryptography, injection, filesystem, network, cookies, secrets, logging, and architecture anti-patterns. Tooling sections document gosec, govulncheck, go test -race, and fuzz testing plus golangci-lint security rules.

  • Supports review, audit, and coding modes with DREAD severity scoring from critical RCE to low best-practice gaps.
  • Audit mode parallelizes up to five vulnerability domains: injection, crypto, web, auth, and concurrency.
  • Quick reference maps SQL, command, XSS, path traversal, timing, and crypto issues to standard library defenses.
  • Requires tracing full data flows and upstream validation before reporting or downgrading findings.
  • Documents gosec, govulncheck, race detector, and fuzz testing alongside golangci-lint security linters.

Golang Security by the numbers

  • 34,835 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • +635 installs in the week ending Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
  • Ranked #10 of 2,209 Security skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Security screen: LOW risk (skills.sh audit)
  • Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
At a glance

golang-security capabilities & compatibility

Capabilities
pr security review with data flow tracing · parallel domain security audits with dread scori · stride threat modeling guidance · standard library defense quick reference · gosec and govulncheck tooling workflows
Use cases
security audit · code review · debugging
From the docs

What golang-security says it does

Security in Go follows the principle of **defense in depth**
retag-ops/docs-cache/skill_samber_cc-skills-golang_golang-security.md
Before flagging a security issue, trace the full data flow through the codebase
retag-ops/docs-cache/skill_samber_cc-skills-golang_golang-security.md
Apply STRIDE to every trust boundary crossing and data flow in your system
retag-ops/docs-cache/skill_samber_cc-skills-golang_golang-security.md
npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-security

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs34.8k
repo stars2.8k
Security audit3 / 3 scanners passed
Last updatedJuly 27, 2026
Repositorysamber/cc-skills-golang

How do I find and fix Go security vulnerabilities with consistent severity scoring and standard library defenses?

Audit, review, and write secure Go code covering injection, cryptography, filesystem safety, network headers, secrets, and dependency vulnerabilities.

Who is it for?

Go teams writing or reviewing risky code involving crypto, user input, authentication, or database access.

Skip if: Skip for non-Go languages or tasks unrelated to security review and vulnerability prevention.

When should I use this skill?

Auditing Go for SQL injection, command injection, XSS, secrets, crypto misuse, race conditions, or dependency CVEs.

What you get

DREAD-scored security findings with traced data flows, defense-in-depth fixes, and verified tooling runs.

  • DREAD-scored findings
  • Secure code fixes
  • Tooling verification commands

By the numbers

  • Metadata version 1.1.8 with MIT license from samber.
  • Audit mode covers five parallel vulnerability domains.
  • Severity table spans DREAD 1-10 from low to critical.

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Persona: You are a senior Go security engineer. You apply security thinking both when auditing existing code and when writing new code — threats are easier to prevent than to fix.

Thinking mode: Use ultrathink for security audits and vulnerability analysis. Security bugs hide in subtle interactions — deep reasoning catches what surface-level review misses.

Modes:

  • Review mode — reviewing a PR for security issues. Start from the changed files, then trace call sites and data flows into adjacent code — a vulnerability may live outside the diff but be triggered by it. Sequential.
  • Audit mode — full codebase security scan. Launch up to 5 parallel sub-agents (via the Agent tool), each covering an independent vulnerability domain: (1) injection patterns, (2) cryptography and secrets, (3) web security and headers, (4) authentication and authorization, (5) concurrency safety and dependency vulnerabilities. Aggregate findings, score with DREAD, and report by severity.
  • Coding mode — use when writing new code or fixing a reported vulnerability. Follow the skill's sequential guidance. Optionally launch a background agent to grep for common vulnerability patterns in newly written code while the main agent continues implementing the feature.

Dependencies:

  • govulncheck: go install golang.org/x/vuln/cmd/govulncheck@latest

Go Security

Overview

Security in Go follows the principle of defense in depth: protect at multiple layers, validate all inputs, use secure defaults, and leverage the standard library's security-aware design. Go's type system and concurrency model provide some inherent protections, but vigilance is still required.

Security Thinking Model

Before writing or reviewing code, ask three questions:

1. What are the trust boundaries? — Where does untrusted data enter the system? (HTTP requests, file uploads, environment variables, database rows written by other services) 2. What can an attacker control? — Which inputs flow into sensitive operations? (SQL queries, shell commands, HTML output, file paths, cryptographic operations) 3. What is the blast radius? — If this defense fails, what's the worst outcome? (Data leak, RCE, privilege escalation, denial of service)

Severity Levels

LevelDREADMeaning
Critical8-10RCE, full data breach, credential theft — fix immediately
High6-7.9Auth bypass, significant data exposure, broken crypto — fix in current sprint
Medium4-5.9Limited exposure, session issues, defense weakening — fix in next sprint
Low1-3.9Minor info disclosure, best-practice deviations — fix opportunistically

Levels align with DREAD scoring.

Research Before Reporting

Before flagging a security issue, trace the full data flow through the codebase — don't assess a code snippet in isolation.

1. Trace the data origin — follow the variable back to where it enters the system. Is it user input, a hardcoded constant, or an internal-only value? 2. Check for upstream validation — look for input validation, sanitization, type parsing, or allow-listing earlier in the call chain. 3. Examine the trust boundary — if the data never crosses a trust boundary (e.g., internal service-to-service with mTLS), the risk profile is different. 4. Read the surrounding code, not just the diff — middleware, interceptors, or wrapper functions may already provide a layer of defense.

Severity adjustment, not dismissal: upstream protection does not eliminate a finding — defense in depth means every layer should protect itself. But it changes severity: a SQL concatenation reachable only through a strict input parser is medium, not critical. Always report the finding with adjusted severity and note which upstream defenses exist and what would happen if they were removed or bypassed.

When downgrading or skipping a finding: add a brief inline comment (e.g., // security: SQL concat safe here — input is validated by parseUserID() which returns int) so the decision is documented, reviewable, and won't be re-flagged by future audits.

Threat Modeling (STRIDE)

Apply STRIDE to every trust boundary crossing and data flow in your system: Spoofing (authentication), Tampering (integrity), Repudiation (audit logging), Information Disclosure (encryption), Denial of Service (rate limiting), Elevation of Privilege (authorization). Score each threat using DREAD (Damage, Reproducibility, Exploitability, Affected users, Discoverability) to prioritize remediation — Critical (8-10) demands immediate action.

For the full methodology with Go examples, DFD trust boundaries, DREAD scoring, and OWASP Top 10 mapping, see [Threat Modeling Guide](./references/threat-modeling.md).

Quick Reference

SeverityVulnerabilityDefenseStandard Library Solution
CriticalSQL InjectionParameterized queries separate data from codedatabase/sql with ? placeholders
CriticalCommand InjectionPass args separately, never via shell concatenationexec.Command with separate args
HighXSSAuto-escaping renders user data as text, not HTML/JShtml/template, text/template
HighPath TraversalScope untrusted file access to an allowed rootGo 1.24+: use os.Root. Pre-Go 1.24: use filepath.IsLocal + filepath.Rel + separator-aware checks; never rely on filepath.Clean + strings.HasPrefix alone.
MediumTiming AttacksConstant-time comparison avoids byte-by-byte leakscrypto/subtle.ConstantTimeCompare
HighCrypto IssuesUse vetted algorithms; never roll your owncrypto/aes, crypto/rand
MediumHTTP SecurityTLS + security headers prevent downgrade attacksnet/http, configure TLSConfig
LowMissing HeadersHSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options prevent browser attacksSecurity headers middleware
MediumRate LimitingRate limits prevent brute-force and resource exhaustiongolang.org/x/time/rate, server timeouts
HighRace ConditionsProtect shared state to prevent data corruptionsync.Mutex, channels, avoid shared state

Detailed Categories

For complete examples, code snippets, and CWE mappings, see:

  • [Cryptography](./references/cryptography.md) — Algorithms, key derivation, TLS configuration.
  • [Injection Vulnerabilities](./references/injection.md) — SQL, command, template injection, XSS, SSRF.
  • [Filesystem Security](./references/filesystem.md) — Path traversal, zip bombs, file permissions, symlinks.
  • [Network/Web Security](./references/network.md) — SSRF, open redirects, HTTP headers, timing attacks, session fixation.
  • [Cookie Security](./references/cookies.md) — Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite flags.
  • [Third-Party Data Leaks](./references/third-party.md) — Analytics privacy risks, GDPR/CCPA compliance.
  • [Memory Safety](./references/memory-safety.md) — Integer overflow, memory aliasing, unsafe usage.
  • [Secrets Management](./references/secrets.md) — Hardcoded credentials, env vars, secret managers.
  • [Logging Security](./references/logging.md) — PII in logs, log injection, sanitization.
  • [Threat Modeling Guide](./references/threat-modeling.md) — STRIDE, DREAD scoring, trust boundaries, OWASP Top 10.
  • [Security Architecture](./references/architecture.md) — Defense-in-depth, Zero Trust, auth patterns, rate limiting, anti-patterns.

Code Review Checklist

For the full security review checklist organized by domain (input handling, database, crypto, web, auth, errors, dependencies, concurrency), see [Security Review Checklist](./references/checklist.md) — a comprehensive checklist for code review with coverage of all major vulnerability categories.

Tooling & Verification

Static Analysis & Linting

Security-relevant linters: bodyclose, sqlclosecheck, nilerr, errcheck, govet, staticcheck. See the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint skill for configuration and usage.

For deeper security-specific analysis:

# Go security checker (SAST)
go get -tool github.com/securego/gosec/v2/cmd/gosec@latest
go tool gosec ./...

# Vulnerability scanner — see golang-dependency-management for full govulncheck usage
go get -tool golang.org/x/vuln/cmd/govulncheck@latest
go tool govulncheck ./...

To check the known CVEs of a specific module or version without scanning the whole tree (e.g. when vetting a dependency on pkg.go.dev), → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-pkg-go-dev skill.

Security Testing

# Race detector
go test -race ./...

# Fuzz testing
go test -fuzz=Fuzz

Common Mistakes

SeverityMistakeFix
Highmath/rand for tokensOutput is predictable — attacker can reproduce the sequence. Use crypto/rand
CriticalSQL string concatenationAttacker can modify query logic. Parameterized queries keep data and code separate
Criticalexec.Command("bash -c")Shell interprets metacharacters (;, `\
HighTrusting unsanitized inputValidate at trust boundaries — internal code trusts the boundary, so catching bad input there protects everything
CriticalHardcoded secretsSecrets in source code end up in version history, CI logs, and backups. Use env vars or secret managers
MediumComparing secrets with ==== short-circuits on first differing byte, leaking timing info. Use crypto/subtle.ConstantTimeCompare
MediumReturning detailed errorsStack traces and DB errors help attackers map your system. Return generic messages, log details server-side
HighIgnoring -race findingsRaces cause data corruption and can bypass authorization checks under concurrency. Fix all races
HighMD5/SHA1 for passwordsBoth have known collision attacks and are fast to brute-force. Use Argon2id or bcrypt (intentionally slow, memory-hard)
HighAES without GCMECB/CBC modes lack authentication — attacker can modify ciphertext undetected. GCM provides encrypt+authenticate
MediumBinding to 0.0.0.0Exposes service to all network interfaces. Bind to specific interface to limit attack surface

Security Anti-Patterns

SeverityAnti-PatternWhy It FailsFix
HighSecurity through obscurityHidden URLs are discoverable via fuzzing, logs, or sourceAuthentication + authorization on all endpoints
HighTrusting client headersX-Forwarded-For, X-Is-Admin are trivially forgedServer-side identity verification
HighClient-side authorizationJavaScript checks are bypassed by any HTTP clientServer-side permission checks on every handler
HighShared secrets across envsStaging breach compromises productionPer-environment secrets via secret manager
CriticalIgnoring crypto errors_, _ = encrypt(data) silently proceeds unencryptedAlways check errors — fail closed, never open
CriticalRolling your own cryptoCustom encryption hasn't been analyzed by cryptographersUse crypto/aes GCM, golang.org/x/crypto/argon2

See [Security Architecture](./references/architecture.md) for detailed anti-patterns with Go code examples.

Cross-References

See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-database, samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-safety, samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observability, samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-continuous-integration skills.

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-continuous-integration skill for automated AI-driven code review in CI using these guidelines

Additional Resources

Related skills

How it compares

Go-specific security audit playbook, not a generic OWASP checklist without Go stdlib mappings.

FAQ

Who is golang-security for?

Go developers and agents auditing or writing code for injection, cryptography, auth, filesystem, and network security.

When should I use golang-security?

During PR security reviews, full codebase audits, or when implementing fixes for reported Go vulnerabilities.

Is golang-security safe to install?

Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.

Securityauditappsec

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.