
Writing Plans
Turn an approved spec or requirements doc into bite-sized, test-first implementation tasks before any agent touches production code.
Overview
Writing Plans is an agent skill most often used in Build (also Validate scope, Ship testing) that converts specs into bite-sized, TDD-oriented implementation plans with explicit executing-plans handoff.
Install
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill writing-plansWhat is this skill?
- Assumes zero codebase context and documents files, tests, docs, and verification per bite-sized step
- Each plan step is one 2–5 minute action aligned to TDD, DRY, YAGNI, and frequent commits
- Mandatory plan header requires superpowers:executing-plans for task-by-task implementation
- Plans saved to `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md` in a dedicated brainstorming worktree
- Announces skill usage at start and treats skilled-but-domain-naive implementers as the audience
- 2–5 minute granularity per plan step
Adoption & trust: 624 installs on skills.sh; 40.1k GitHub stars; 3/3 security scanners passed (skills.sh audits).
What problem does it solve?
You have requirements or an approved spec but no ordered, test-aware task list an agent can follow without improvising in your codebase.
Who is it for?
Multi-step features after brainstorming, especially in a dedicated worktree, when autonomous agents need file-level instructions and TDD checkpoints.
Skip if: Skipping straight to coding when no plan exists, or re-planning trivial one-file edits that already have an approved executing-plans document in place.
When should I use this skill?
You have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code.
What do I get? / Deliverables
You get a dated `docs/plans/` markdown plan with granular steps and a header that invokes executing-plans task-by-task after brainstorming.
- Dated implementation plan at `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md`
- Plan header referencing executing-plans for downstream implementation
Recommended Skills
Journey fit
Spans multiple journey phases - primary shelf plus alternate fits below.
Canonical shelf is Build PM because the artifact is an engineer-ready implementation plan with files, tests, and commits—not a fuzzy idea brief. PM subphase covers planning artifacts that sequence work; this skill outputs the plan header that hands off to executing-plans.
Where it fits
Break a validated feature spec into ordered engineering tasks before estimating build time.
Produce `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-feature.md` with file paths and TDD micro-steps for the agent implementer.
Plan UI tasks with explicit test and commit steps so a context-free agent does not skip accessibility checks.
Embed run-failing-test and run-passing-test steps in the plan so shipping includes verification gates.
How it compares
Use instead of ad-hoc chat implementation lists when you need durable, commit-sized tasks—not instead of brainstorming before the spec is settled.
Common Questions / FAQ
Who is writing-plans for?
Solo and indie builders using agent stacks who want spec-to-backlog discipline before any implementation pass, especially with Superpowers-style execution.
When should I use writing-plans?
Use it in Validate when scoping a multi-step feature into an executable backlog, in Build PM before touching code, and in Ship testing prep when plans must embed test steps; run after brainstorming in a worktree.
Is writing-plans safe to install?
Check the Security Audits panel on this Prism page; the skill mainly writes planning markdown but is marked critical risk because bad plans drive high-impact autonomous changes.
Workflow Chain
Requires first: brainstorming
Then invoke: executing plans
SKILL.md
READMESKILL.md - Writing Plans
# Writing Plans ## Overview Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits. Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well. **Announce at start:** "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan." **Context:** This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill). **Save plans to:** `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md` ## Bite-Sized Task Granularity **Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):** - "Write the failing test" - step - "Run it to make sure it fails" - step - "Implement the minimal code to make the test pass" - step - "Run the tests and make sure they pass" - step - "Commit" - step ## Plan Document Header **Every plan MUST start with this header:** ```markdown # [Feature Name] Implementation Plan > **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task. **Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds] **Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach] **Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries] --- ``` ## Task Structure ```markdown ### Task N: [Component Name] **Files:** - Create: `exact/path/to/file.py` - Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145` - Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py` **Step 1: Write the failing test** ```python def test_specific_behavior(): result = function(input) assert result == expected ``` **Step 2: Run test to verify it fails** Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v` Expected: FAIL with "function not defined" **Step 3: Write minimal implementation** ```python def function(input): return expected ``` **Step 4: Run test to verify it passes** Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v` Expected: PASS **Step 5: Commit** ```bash git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py git commit -m "feat: add specific feature" ``` ``` ## Remember - Exact file paths always - Complete code in plan (not "add validation") - Exact commands with expected output - Reference relevant skills with @ syntax - DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits ## Execution Handoff After saving the plan, offer execution choice: **"Plan complete and saved to `docs/plans/<filename>.md`. Two execution options:** **1. Subagent-Driven (this session)** - I dispatch fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration **2. Parallel Session (separate)** - Open new session with executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints **Which approach?"** **If Subagent-Driven chosen:** - **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development - Stay in this session - Fresh subagent per task + code review **If Parallel Session chosen:** - Guide them to open new session in worktree - **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** New session uses superpowers:executing-plans ## When to Use This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview. ## Limitations - Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above. - Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review. - Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.