Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
tristanmanchester avatar

Designing Beautiful Websites

  • 2.2k installs
  • 3 repo stars
  • Updated June 29, 2026
  • tristanmanchester/agent-skills

designing-beautiful-websites is an agent skill that >-.

About

Core philosophy Make the next action obvious Build from user goals upward Systemise visuals Validate early Why this exists Websites fail when they look nice but don t match user goals hide key actions require too much thinking or are visually inconsistent This skill turns vague requests like make it look better into a repeatable workflow that produces clear structure usable interactions and a cohesive visual system What done looks like Deliverables should be usable by builders engineers no code builders future agents Design brief users goals constraints success metrics IA flows sitemap or nav model and 1 3 key user journeys Layout wireframes responsive page structure component inventory Visual system tokens type spacing colour radius shadow and usage rules Component specs states behaviour empty loading error QA notes accessibility responsiveness edge cases If time is limited prioritise clarity hierarchy consistency accessibility

  • Designs UX/UI for websites and web apps: UX strategy, information architecture,
  • user flows, wireframes, UI systems, component specs, and polished visual design.
  • Use when the user asks to design, redesign, modernise, critique, or improve a
  • Follow designing-beautiful-websites SKILL.md steps and documented constraints.
  • Follow designing-beautiful-websites SKILL.md steps and documented constraints.

Designing Beautiful Websites by the numbers

  • 2,202 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • +80 installs in the week ending Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
  • Ranked #525 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Security screen: MEDIUM risk (skills.sh audit)
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
At a glance

designing-beautiful-websites capabilities & compatibility

Capabilities
designs ux/ui for websites and web apps: ux stra · user flows, wireframes, ui systems, component sp · use when the user asks to design, redesign, mode · follow designing beautiful websites skill.md ste
Use cases
orchestration
From the docs

What designing-beautiful-websites says it does

Designs UX/UI for websites and web apps: UX strategy, information architecture,
SKILL.md
user flows, wireframes, UI systems, component specs, and polished visual design.
SKILL.md
Use when the user asks to design, redesign, modernise, critique, or improve a
SKILL.md
npx skills add https://github.com/tristanmanchester/agent-skills --skill designing-beautiful-websites

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs2.2k
repo stars3
Security audit3 / 3 scanners passed
Last updatedJune 29, 2026
Repositorytristanmanchester/agent-skills

When should an agent use designing-beautiful-websites and what problem does it solve?

>-

Who is it for?

Developers invoking designing-beautiful-websites as documented in the skill source.

Skip if: Skip when requirements fall outside designing-beautiful-websites documented scope.

When should I use this skill?

>-

What you get

Outputs aligned with the designing-beautiful-websites SKILL.md workflow and stated deliverables.

  • wireframes
  • UI system spec
  • UX strategy document

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Designing Beautiful Websites

Core philosophy: Make the next action obvious. Build from user goals upward. Systemise visuals. Validate early.

Why this exists

Websites fail when they look “nice” but:

  • don’t match user goals,
  • hide key actions,
  • require too much thinking,
  • or are visually inconsistent.

This skill turns vague requests like “make it look better” into a repeatable workflow that produces:

  • clear structure,
  • usable interactions,
  • and a cohesive visual system.

What “done” looks like

Deliverables should be usable by builders (engineers, no-code builders, future agents):

  • Design brief: users, goals, constraints, success metrics.
  • IA + flows: sitemap (or nav model), and 1–3 key user journeys.
  • Layout + wireframes: responsive page structure, component inventory.
  • Visual system: tokens (type, spacing, colour, radius, shadow), and usage rules.
  • Component specs: states, behaviour, empty/loading/error.
  • QA notes: accessibility, responsiveness, edge cases.

If time is limited, prioritise: clarity + hierarchy + consistency + accessibility.

Quick start workflow

Copy this checklist into the working notes and tick it off:

  • [ ] 0. Inputs: goal, audience, content, constraints, brand signals.
  • [ ] 1. Strategy: user goals + business goals + success metrics.
  • [ ] 2. Scope: pages/features/content; prioritise “key paths”.
  • [ ] 3. Structure: IA + navigation model + flows.
  • [ ] 4. Skeleton: wireframes + component inventory + responsive layout.
  • [ ] 5. Surface: visual system + page comps + states.
  • [ ] 6. Validate: usability pass + accessibility pass + consistency pass.
  • [ ] 7. Hand-off: tokens + component specs + implementation notes.

Default rule: do not jump to surface polish until structure and skeleton are believable.

Non‑negotiables

1) Reduce thinking

Design so users rarely wonder:

  • “Where am I?”
  • “What do I do next?”
  • “Is that clickable?”
  • “Why did they call it that?”

Prefer obvious over clever.

2) Use conventions aggressively

Use familiar patterns unless there is a measured reason to deviate. Unusual UI is a tax on every user interaction.

3) Clear visual hierarchy

Every screen must answer (at a glance):

  • what this page is,
  • what the primary action is,
  • where the navigation is,
  • what is secondary.

4) Grouping must be unambiguous

If spacing is doing grouping work:

  • there must be more space around groups than within groups.

5) Feedback and forgiveness

Users should:

  • see results of actions quickly,
  • understand system status,
  • and recover via undo/back/cancel where possible.

Prefer preventing errors over scolding users.

6) Accessibility is part of “beautiful”

Good aesthetics survive:

  • keyboard-only use,
  • low vision,
  • colour‑blindness,
  • small screens,
  • slow networks.

Default outputs format

When responding, produce: 1. Design brief (bullets) 2. IA + key flows (bullets + simple diagrams if useful) 3. Component inventory (table or list) 4. Design tokens (CSS variables or JSON) 5. Page-level guidance (for each page/section) 6. States & edge cases 7. Implementation notes (HTML structure, CSS approach, ARIA, etc.)

If the user asked for a critique/audit, output:

  • issues (grouped by severity),
  • fixes,
  • and a “next iteration plan”.

The workflow in practice

Step 0 — Gather inputs (fast)

Ask only what’s needed; otherwise assume and state assumptions.

Minimum questions:

  • Primary user: who is this for?
  • Primary goal: what must they do?
  • Business goal: what does success look like?
  • Content: what is real copy/data?
  • Brand signals: existing colours/logo/type/voice?
  • Constraints: tech stack, deadline, accessibility level.

If inputs are missing, create a working brief with explicit assumptions.

Step 1 — Strategy (align intent)

Produce:

  • primary + secondary user goals,
  • business objectives,
  • success metrics,
  • constraints/risk.

Step 2 — Scope (decide what exists)

Define:

  • pages/screens,
  • features,
  • content requirements,
  • and what is out of scope.

Pick 1–3 key paths (the journeys that matter most). Optimise these first.

Step 3 — Structure (make it findable)

Create:

  • sitemap / nav model (global + local nav),
  • page purpose statements,
  • user flows for key paths.

Rule: navigation labels should be self‑evident; avoid internal jargon.

Step 4 — Skeleton (arrange the UI)

Create:

  • wireframes per page,
  • component inventory,
  • layout constraints (container widths, grids, spacing rhythm),
  • and priority order per breakpoint.

Rule: start with the feature/content, not the “app shell”.

Step 5 — Surface (make it beautiful)

Build a consistent system:

  • spacing + sizing scale,
  • typography scale,
  • colour palette + shades,
  • radius + border rules,
  • elevation/shadow scale,
  • icon + illustration style,
  • motion rules (optional).

Apply to page comps.

Step 6 — Validate (fast loops)

Run these checks:

  • Glance test (5–10 seconds): can someone tell what this is and what to do?
  • Key‑path walkthrough: can a first‑time user complete the main task?
  • Consistency pass: are tokens respected? is hierarchy consistent?
  • Accessibility pass: contrast, focus states, semantics, error messaging.

Step 7 — Hand-off (make it buildable)

Provide:

  • tokens,
  • component specs (states + spacing + behaviour),
  • responsive rules,
  • and edge cases.

Default starter system

Use this system unless the project already has one.

Spacing & sizing scale (px)

Use a non-linear scale so choices are easy: 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48, 64, 96, 128

Rules:

  • pick from the scale; avoid “one-off” numbers.
  • for grouping: inside-group spacing < between-group spacing.

Typography scale (px)

Keep it tight: 6–8 sizes is enough.

Suggested:

  • 12 caption
  • 14 small/body-secondary
  • 16 body
  • 20 subheading
  • 24 h3
  • 30 h2
  • 40 h1/hero

Rules:

  • default body line-height ~ 1.5–1.7.
  • limit line length for reading (~45–80 characters).
  • use weight/colour/spacing before adding new sizes.

Colour system

  • define neutrals (backgrounds + text), one primary, and semantic accents.
  • define shades up front (e.g., 100–900), don’t generate ad-hoc lightens/darkens.
  • “Grey” can be warm or cool; keep a consistent temperature.

Contrast rules:

  • normal text target: ≥ 4.5:1
  • large text target: ≥ 3:1

Elevation / shadow system

Use 3–5 shadow levels that map to meaning:

  • 1: buttons/cards (subtle)
  • 2: popovers/menus
  • 3: sticky headers
  • 4: modals
  • 5: high priority overlays

Borders

Prefer:

  • spacing,
  • subtle shadows,
  • or small background changes

over heavy borders.

Empty states

Empty states are a first impression. They must:

  • explain what’s empty,
  • why it matters,
  • and what to do next.

Progressive disclosure

Use these reference files when deeper detail is needed:

  • Workflow & deliverablesreferences/WORKFLOW.md
  • Page patternsreferences/PAGE-PATTERNS.md
  • Audit / critiquereferences/DESIGN-AUDIT.md
  • Usability & navigationreferences/USABILITY.md
  • Visual design systemsreferences/VISUAL-DESIGN.md
  • Interaction & formsreferences/INTERACTION-DESIGN.md
  • Information architecturereferences/INFORMATION-ARCHITECTURE.md
  • Content & microcopyreferences/CONTENT-COPY.md
  • Responsive rulesreferences/RESPONSIVE.md
  • Accessibilityreferences/ACCESSIBILITY.md
  • Checklists & templatesreferences/CHECKLISTS.md

Quick search

If running locally:

grep -i "empty state\|hierarchy\|spacing" -n references/*.md

THE EXACT PROMPT — UX/UI plan

You are designing a website UI/UX.

1) Write a crisp design brief (users, goals, constraints, success metrics).
2) Define information architecture + navigation model.
3) Identify 1–3 key user paths; write step-by-step flows.
4) Produce a component inventory for the key pages.
5) Propose a design token system (spacing, type, colour, radius, shadow) with rules.
6) Describe page layouts (mobile-first) and key interactions.
7) List empty/loading/error states and edge cases.
8) Run a usability + accessibility + consistency pass; revise.

Output must be specific and implementable.
Avoid vague advice.

THE EXACT PROMPT — Visual polish pass

Review this UI for visual quality.

- Fix hierarchy (what is primary vs secondary vs tertiary?)
- Fix spacing (grouping clarity; rhythm; alignment)
- Fix typography (scale, weights, line height, line length)
- Fix colour (contrast, palette consistency, accent usage)
- Fix depth (shadows/borders; focus on meaning)
- Improve empty states and microcopy

Return:
1) a list of concrete changes
2) updated tokens (if needed)
3) before/after descriptions of the most important screens.

THE EXACT PROMPT — Usability “glance test”

Pretend you have 10 seconds to look at this page.

Answer:
- What is this page?
- Who is it for?
- What are the top 3 things I can do here?
- What is the primary action?
- Where is the navigation?

Then list everything that created a question mark, and propose fixes.

THE EXACT PROMPT — Component spec (single component)

Write a build-ready spec for this component.

Include:
- Purpose + when to use
- Anatomy (parts)
- Variants
- States: default/hover/focus/active/disabled/loading/error/success/empty
- Behaviour rules (keyboard + mouse + touch)
- Spacing + typography + colour tokens used
- Accessibility notes (ARIA if needed)
- Edge cases (long text, missing data, localisation)

Keep it concise but unambiguous.

THE EXACT PROMPT — Accessibility pass

Review this design for accessibility.

Check:
- text contrast (normal and large text)
- keyboard navigation and focus visibility
- semantic element choices (button vs link vs div)
- form labelling and error announcement
- motion and reduced-motion behaviour

Return:
1) issues grouped by severity
2) concrete fixes (design + implementation)
3) any token changes needed (colours, focus styles)

THE EXACT PROMPT — Responsive pass

Define responsive behaviour for this page/component.

For each breakpoint (small phone, large phone, tablet, desktop):
- layout (stack/columns)
- what becomes primary vs secondary
- how text wraps/truncates
- how tables, toolbars, and secondary actions adapt

Then list edge cases (long text, empty, error) and how they render.

Related skills

FAQ

What is designing-beautiful-websites?

>-

When should I use designing-beautiful-websites?

>-

Is designing-beautiful-websites safe to install?

Review the Security Audits panel on this page before production use.

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.