Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
wentorai avatar

Bayesian Statistics Guide

  • 7 installs
  • 269 repo stars
  • Updated June 19, 2026
  • wentorai/research-plugins

Helps with ai & agent building tasks during AI-assisted development.

About

bayesian-statistics-guide is a Claude Code skill for ai & agent building. It helps solo builders move faster with AI-assisted coding.

  • bayesian-statistics-guide
  • AI & Agent Building
  • AI-coding skill

Bayesian Statistics Guide by the numbers

  • 7 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • Ranked #12,545 of 16,546 AI & Agent Building skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 1, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/wentorai/research-plugins --skill bayesian-statistics-guide

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs7
repo stars269
Last updatedJune 19, 2026
Repositorywentorai/research-plugins

What it does

Helps with ai & agent building tasks during AI-assisted development.

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

Bayesian Statistics Guide

A skill for applying Bayesian statistical methods to research data analysis. Covers prior specification, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, posterior interpretation, model comparison, and reporting standards.

Bayesian Framework Overview

Bayes' Theorem in Practice

Posterior = (Likelihood x Prior) / Evidence

P(theta | data) = P(data | theta) * P(theta) / P(data)

In practice:
  P(theta | data) is proportional to P(data | theta) * P(theta)
  (the denominator is a normalizing constant)

When to Use Bayesian Methods

ScenarioBayesian Advantage
Small sample sizesPriors regularize estimates
Complex hierarchical modelsNatural framework for multilevel data
Sequential data collectionUpdate beliefs as data arrives
Prior knowledge availableFormally incorporate existing evidence
Model comparisonBayes factors and posterior model probabilities
PredictionFull posterior predictive distributions

Prior Specification

Types of Priors

import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

def visualize_priors(parameter_name: str, prior_type: str = 'weakly_informative'):
    """
    Visualize common prior choices for a parameter.
    """
    x = np.linspace(-10, 10, 1000)

    priors = {
        'flat': {
            'dist': stats.uniform(loc=-100, scale=200),
            'description': 'Flat/Uniform: minimal prior info (often improper)',
            'recommendation': 'Avoid -- can lead to improper posteriors'
        },
        'weakly_informative': {
            'dist': stats.norm(loc=0, scale=2.5),
            'description': 'Weakly informative: Normal(0, 2.5)',
            'recommendation': 'Good default for regression coefficients'
        },
        'informative': {
            'dist': stats.norm(loc=0.5, scale=0.2),
            'description': 'Informative: based on previous studies',
            'recommendation': 'Use when strong prior evidence exists'
        },
        'horseshoe': {
            'dist': stats.cauchy(loc=0, scale=1),
            'description': 'Horseshoe-like (Cauchy): sparsity-inducing',
            'recommendation': 'Good for variable selection problems'
        }
    }

    prior = priors.get(prior_type, priors['weakly_informative'])
    return prior

# Recommended default priors (Gelman et al., 2008):
# Intercept: Normal(0, 10)
# Coefficients: Normal(0, 2.5) on standardized predictors
# Standard deviation: Half-Cauchy(0, 2.5) or Exponential(1)
# Correlation: LKJ(2) for correlation matrices

MCMC with PyMC

Linear Regression Example

import pymc as pm
import arviz as az

def bayesian_regression(X, y, feature_names=None):
    """
    Fit a Bayesian linear regression model using PyMC.

    Args:
        X: Feature matrix (n_samples, n_features)
        y: Response variable (n_samples,)
        feature_names: List of feature names
    """
    n_features = X.shape[1]
    if feature_names is None:
        feature_names = [f'x{i}' for i in range(n_features)]

    with pm.Model() as model:
        # Priors
        intercept = pm.Normal('intercept', mu=0, sigma=10)
        betas = pm.Normal('betas', mu=0, sigma=2.5, shape=n_features)
        sigma = pm.HalfCauchy('sigma', beta=2.5)

        # Linear predictor
        mu = intercept + pm.math.dot(X, betas)

        # Likelihood
        y_obs = pm.Normal('y_obs', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y)

        # MCMC sampling
        trace = pm.sample(
            draws=2000,
            tune=1000,
            chains=4,
            cores=4,
            target_accept=0.9,
            return_inferencedata=True
        )

    return model, trace

# After fitting, analyze results:
# az.summary(trace, var_names=['intercept', 'betas', 'sigma'])
# az.plot_trace(trace)
# az.plot_forest(trace, var_names=['betas'])

Diagnostics

MCMC Convergence Checks

def check_mcmc_diagnostics(trace) -> dict:
    """
    Check MCMC convergence diagnostics.
    """
    summary = az.summary(trace)

    diagnostics = {
        'r_hat': {
            'values': summary['r_hat'].to_dict(),
            'threshold': 1.01,
            'pass': (summary['r_hat'] < 1.01).all(),
            'interpretation': 'R-hat < 1.01 indicates convergence'
        },
        'ess_bulk': {
            'min_value': summary['ess_bulk'].min(),
            'threshold': 400,
            'pass': (summary['ess_bulk'] > 400).all(),
            'interpretation': 'ESS > 400 ensures reliable posterior estimates'
        },
        'ess_tail': {
            'min_value': summary['ess_tail'].min(),
            'threshold': 400,
            'pass': (summary['ess_tail'] > 400).all(),
            'interpretation': 'Tail ESS > 400 ensures reliable credible intervals'
        }
    }

    # Overall assessment
    diagnostics['converged'] = all(
        d['pass'] for d in diagnostics.values() if 'pass' in d
    )

    return diagnostics

Model Comparison

Bayesian Model Selection

def compare_models(traces: dict) -> dict:
    """
    Compare Bayesian models using LOO-CV and WAIC.

    Args:
        traces: Dict mapping model names to InferenceData objects
    """
    comparison = az.compare(traces, ic='loo')

    return {
        'ranking': comparison.index.tolist(),
        'loo_values': comparison['loo'].to_dict(),
        'weights': comparison['weight'].to_dict(),
        'interpretation': (
            f"Best model: {comparison.index[0]} "
            f"(weight = {comparison['weight'].iloc[0]:.2f})"
        )
    }

Reporting Bayesian Results

Follow the WAMBS checklist (Depaoli & van de Schoot, 2017):

1. Priors: Report all prior distributions and justify choices 2. Convergence: Report R-hat, ESS, and trace plots (in supplement) 3. Posteriors: Report posterior mean/median, 95% credible interval (HDI preferred) 4. Sensitivity: Show results are robust to reasonable prior changes 5. Model fit: Report LOO-IC, WAIC, or posterior predictive checks

Example results sentence: "The effect of treatment on outcome was estimated at beta = 0.45, 95% HDI [0.21, 0.68], with a posterior probability of 0.99 that the effect is positive."

References

  • Gelman, A., et al. (2013). Bayesian Data Analysis (3rd ed.). CRC Press.
  • McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical Rethinking (2nd ed.). CRC Press.

Related skills

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.