
Lattice Crypto Attacks
- 2.2k installs
- 1.5k repo stars
- Updated June 16, 2026
- yaklang/hack-skills
lattice-crypto-attacks is an agent skill for >-
About
The lattice-crypto-attacks skill documents workflows and patterns from the repository SKILL md name lattice-crypto-attacks description Lattice-based cryptanalysis playbook Use when attacking RSA via Coppersmith small roots recovering DSA ECDSA nonces from bias solving knapsack problems or applying LLL BKZ reduction to cryptographic constructions SKILL Lattice-Based Cryptanalysis Expert Attack Playbook AI LOAD INSTRUCTION Expert lattice techniques for CTF and cryptanalysis Covers LLL BKZ reduction Coppersmith's method univariate and multivariate Hidden Number Problem for DSA ECDSA nonce recovery knapsack attacks and NTRU analysis Base models often fail to construct the correct attack lattice wrong dimensions missing scaling factors or misapply Coppersmith bounds RELATED ROUTING rsa-attack-techniques rsa-attack-techniques SKILL md for RSA-specific attacks that use lattice methods Coppersmith Boneh-Durfee symmetric-cipher-attacks symmetric-cipher-attacks SKILL md for LCG state recovery via lattice classical-cipher-analysis classical-cipher-analysis SKILL md when lattice methods apply to classical cipher analysis Quick application guide Problem Type Lattice Technique Key Parameter RSA.
- SKILL: Lattice-Based Cryptanalysis - Expert Attack Playbook
- [rsa-attack-techniques](../rsa-attack-techniques/SKILL.md) for RSA-specific attacks that use lattice methods (Coppersmit
- [symmetric-cipher-attacks](../symmetric-cipher-attacks/SKILL.md) for LCG state recovery via lattice
- [classical-cipher-analysis](../classical-cipher-analysis/SKILL.md) when lattice methods apply to classical cipher analys
- **SVP** (Shortest Vector Problem): Find the shortest non-zero vector in L
Lattice Crypto Attacks by the numbers
- 2,226 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +121 installs in the week ending Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #368 of 2,153 Testing & QA skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: CRITICAL risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
lattice-crypto-attacks capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- skill: lattice based cryptanalysis expert atta · [rsa attack techniques](../rsa attack techniques · [symmetric cipher attacks](../symmetric cipher a · [classical cipher analysis](../classical cipher · **svp** (shortest vector problem): find the shor
- Use cases
- documentation
What lattice-crypto-attacks says it does
--- name: lattice-crypto-attacks description: >- Lattice-based cryptanalysis playbook.
Use when attacking RSA via Coppersmith small roots, recovering DSA/ECDSA nonces from bias, solving knapsack problems, or applying LLL/BKZ reduction to cryptographic constructions.
Covers LLL/BKZ reduction, Coppersmith's method (univariate and multivariate), Hidden Number Problem for DSA/ECDSA nonce recovery, knapsack attacks, and NTRU analysis.
npx skills add https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills --skill lattice-crypto-attacksAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 2.2k |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 1.5k |
| Security audit | 1 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | June 16, 2026 |
| Repository | yaklang/hack-skills ↗ |
What problem does lattice-crypto-attacks solve for developers using the documented workflows?
>-
Who is it for?
Developers working with lattice-crypto-attacks patterns described in the skill documentation.
Skip if: Skip when docs are empty or the task is outside the skill documented scope.
When should I use this skill?
>-
What you get
Grounded guidance and workflows from SKILL.md for lattice-crypto-attacks.
- Attack lattice construction
- LLL/BKZ reduction script
By the numbers
- Covers 5 attack targets: RSA, DSA, ECDSA, knapsack, and NTRU
- Documents 2 reduction algorithms: LLL and BKZ
Files
SKILL: Lattice-Based Cryptanalysis — Expert Attack Playbook
AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Expert lattice techniques for CTF and cryptanalysis. Covers LLL/BKZ reduction, Coppersmith's method (univariate and multivariate), Hidden Number Problem for DSA/ECDSA nonce recovery, knapsack attacks, and NTRU analysis. Base models often fail to construct the correct attack lattice (wrong dimensions, missing scaling factors) or misapply Coppersmith bounds.
0. RELATED ROUTING
- rsa-attack-techniques for RSA-specific attacks that use lattice methods (Coppersmith, Boneh-Durfee)
- symmetric-cipher-attacks for LCG state recovery via lattice
- classical-cipher-analysis when lattice methods apply to classical cipher analysis
Quick application guide
| Problem Type | Lattice Technique | Key Parameter |
|---|---|---|
| RSA small roots | Coppersmith (LLL on polynomial lattice) | Root bound X < N^(1/e) |
| RSA small d | Boneh-Durfee (multivariate Coppersmith) | d < N^0.292 |
| DSA/ECDSA nonce bias | Hidden Number Problem → CVP | Bias bits known |
| Knapsack cipher | Low-density lattice attack | Density < 0.9408 |
| LCG truncated output | CVP on recurrence lattice | Unknown bits per output |
| Subset sum | LLL reduction on knapsack lattice | Element size vs count |
| NTRU key recovery | Lattice reduction on NTRU lattice | Dimension and key size |
---
1. LATTICE FUNDAMENTALS
1.1 Definitions
A lattice L is the set of all integer linear combinations of basis vectors:
L = { a₁·b₁ + a₂·b₂ + ... + aₙ·bₙ | aᵢ ∈ ℤ }where b₁, ..., bₙ are linearly independent vectors in ℝᵐ.
Key problems:
- SVP (Shortest Vector Problem): Find the shortest non-zero vector in L
- CVP (Closest Vector Problem): Given target t, find v ∈ L closest to t
- SVP is NP-hard in general, but LLL finds an approximately short vector in polynomial time
1.2 Lattice Quality Metrics
Determinant: det(L) = |det(B)| where B is the basis matrix
Gaussian heuristic: shortest vector ≈ √(n/(2πe)) · det(L)^(1/n)---
2. LLL ALGORITHM
2.1 What LLL Does
Takes a lattice basis B and produces a reduced basis B' where:
- Vectors are nearly orthogonal
- First vector is approximately short (within 2^((n-1)/2) factor of SVP)
- Runs in polynomial time: O(n^5 · d · log³ B) where d = dimension, B = max entry size
2.2 SageMath Usage
# SageMath
M = matrix(ZZ, [
[1, 0, 0, large_value_1],
[0, 1, 0, large_value_2],
[0, 0, 1, large_value_3],
[0, 0, 0, modulus],
])
L = M.LLL()
# Short vectors in L reveal the solution
short_vector = L[0] # first row is typically shortest2.3 Python (fpylll)
from fpylll import IntegerMatrix, LLL
n = 4
A = IntegerMatrix(n, n)
# Fill matrix A...
A[0] = (1, 0, 0, large_value_1)
A[1] = (0, 1, 0, large_value_2)
A[2] = (0, 0, 1, large_value_3)
A[3] = (0, 0, 0, modulus)
LLL.reduction(A)
print(A[0]) # shortest vector---
3. BKZ (BLOCK KORKINE-ZOLOTAREV)
3.1 Comparison with LLL
| Property | LLL | BKZ-β |
|---|---|---|
| Quality | 2^((n-1)/2) approximation | 2^(n/(β-1)) approximation |
| Speed | Polynomial | Exponential in β |
| Block size | Fixed (2) | Configurable β |
| Best for | Quick reduction | High-quality reduction |
3.2 Usage
# SageMath
M = matrix(ZZ, [...])
L = M.BKZ(block_size=20) # β = 20
# fpylll
from fpylll import BKZ
BKZ.reduction(A, BKZ.Param(block_size=20))Rule of thumb: start with LLL, increase to BKZ if needed. BKZ block size 20-40 is usually sufficient for CTF.
---
4. COPPERSMITH'S METHOD
4.1 Univariate Case
Given f(x) ≡ 0 (mod N) with small root |x₀| < X, find x₀.
Bound: X < N^(1/d) where d = degree of f.
# SageMath — built-in small_roots
N = ...
R.<x> = PolynomialRing(Zmod(N))
f = x^3 + a*x^2 + b*x + c # known polynomial
roots = f.small_roots(X=2^100, beta=1.0, epsilon=1/30)Parameters:
X: upper bound on the rootbeta: N = p^beta (beta=1.0 for modular root of N itself; beta=0.5 for root mod unknown factor p ≈ √N)epsilon: smaller = better results but slower (try 1/30 to 1/100)
4.2 Stereotyped Message Attack (RSA)
# SageMath
n, e, c = ... # RSA parameters
known_msb = ... # known upper portion of message
R.<x> = PolynomialRing(Zmod(n))
f = (known_msb + x)^e - c
# x represents the unknown lower bits
X = 2^(unknown_bit_count)
roots = f.small_roots(X=X, beta=1.0)
if roots:
m = known_msb + int(roots[0])4.3 Partial Key Exposure (Factor p)
Known MSBs of p: p = p_known + x where x is small.
# SageMath
n = ...
p_known = ... # known upper bits of p
R.<x> = PolynomialRing(Zmod(n))
f = p_known + x
roots = f.small_roots(X=2^unknown_bits, beta=0.5)
# beta=0.5 because p ≈ √n
if roots:
p = p_known + int(roots[0])
q = n // p4.4 Multivariate Coppersmith (Howgrave-Graham)
For f(x, y) ≡ 0 (mod N):
- No polynomial-time algorithm guaranteed
- Heuristic methods work in practice
- Used in Boneh-Durfee for RSA small d
# SageMath — Boneh-Durfee
# e*d ≡ 1 (mod phi) where phi = (p-1)(q-1)
# Rewrite: e*d = 1 + k*((n+1) - (p+q))
# Let x = k, y = (p+q), both small relative to n
R.<x, y> = PolynomialRing(ZZ)
A = (n + 1) // 2
f = 1 + x * (A + y) # mod e
# Build shift polynomials and construct lattice
# Apply LLL to find small (x₀, y₀)---
5. HIDDEN NUMBER PROBLEM (HNP) — DSA/ECDSA NONCE RECOVERY
5.1 Problem Statement
Given: signatures (rᵢ, sᵢ) where nonces kᵢ have known bias (leaked MSBs or LSBs).
DSA equation: s = k⁻¹(H(m) + xr) mod q
Rearranged: k = s⁻¹(H(m) + xr) mod q
If partial bits of k are known: reduces to CVP on a lattice.
5.2 Attack Setup
# SageMath
def ecdsa_nonce_attack(signatures, q, known_bits, bit_position='msb'):
"""
signatures: list of (r, s, hash, known_nonce_bits)
q: curve order
known_bits: number of known bits per nonce
"""
n = len(signatures)
# Build lattice
B = 2^(q.nbits() - known_bits) # bound on unknown part
M = matrix(QQ, n + 2, n + 2)
for i in range(n):
r_i, s_i, h_i, a_i = signatures[i]
t_i = Integer(inverse_mod(s_i, q) * r_i % q)
u_i = Integer(inverse_mod(s_i, q) * h_i % q)
M[i, i] = q
M[n, i] = t_i
M[n+1, i] = u_i - a_i # a_i = known nonce bits
M[n, n] = B / q
M[n+1, n+1] = B
# LLL reduction
L = M.LLL()
# Find row containing the private key x
for row in L:
x_candidate = Integer(row[n] * q / B) % q
# Verify x_candidate against one signature
if verify_private_key(x_candidate, signatures[0], q):
return x_candidate
return None5.3 Practical Nonce Bias Sources
| Source | Leaked Bits | Required Signatures |
|---|---|---|
| MSB bias (always 0) | 1 bit | ~100 signatures |
| k generated with wrong length | Variable | ~50 signatures |
| Timing side channel | 1-4 bits | 20-100 signatures |
| Insecure PRNG | Many | Few |
| Reused nonce (k₁ = k₂) | All | 2 signatures |
For reused nonce (simplest case):
def ecdsa_reused_nonce(r, s1, s2, h1, h2, q):
"""Recover private key when nonce k is reused."""
# s1 - s2 = k⁻¹(h1 - h2) mod q (since r is same)
k = ((h1 - h2) * inverse_mod(s1 - s2, q)) % q
x = ((s1 * k - h1) * inverse_mod(r, q)) % q
return x, k---
6. KNAPSACK / SUBSET SUM ATTACKS
6.1 Low-Density Attack
Knapsack: given weights a₁,...,aₙ and target S, find x₁,...,xₙ ∈ {0,1} such that Σxᵢaᵢ = S.
Density d = n / max(log₂ aᵢ). If d < 0.9408, lattice attack works.
# SageMath
def knapsack_lattice(weights, target):
"""Solve subset sum via LLL lattice attack."""
n = len(weights)
# Build lattice (Lagarias-Odlyzko style)
N = ceil(sqrt(n) / 2) # scaling factor
M = matrix(ZZ, n + 1, n + 1)
for i in range(n):
M[i, i] = 1
M[i, n] = N * weights[i]
M[n, n] = N * target
# Alternative: CJLOSS embedding
M2 = matrix(ZZ, n + 1, n + 2)
for i in range(n):
M2[i, i] = 1
M2[i, n + 1] = N * weights[i]
M2[n, n] = 1
M2[n, n + 1] = N * (-target)
L = M2.LLL()
# Look for short vector with entries in {0, 1, -1}
for row in L:
if all(v in (0, 1) for v in row[:n]):
solution = list(row[:n])
if sum(solution[i] * weights[i] for i in range(n)) == target:
return solution
return None---
7. NTRU CRYPTANALYSIS
7.1 NTRU Lattice
# SageMath
def ntru_lattice_attack(h, q, N):
"""
Construct NTRU lattice for key recovery.
h = public key polynomial (mod q)
q = modulus
N = dimension
"""
# NTRU lattice:
# | qI 0 |
# | H I |
# where H is the circulant matrix of h
H = matrix(ZZ, N, N)
for i in range(N):
for j in range(N):
H[i, j] = h[(j - i) % N]
M = block_matrix([
[q * identity_matrix(N), zero_matrix(N)],
[H, identity_matrix(N)]
])
L = M.LLL()
# Short vector in reduced basis = (f, g) private key
for row in L:
f = vector(row[:N])
g = vector(row[N:])
if f.norm() < q and g.norm() < q:
return f, g
return None---
8. CONSTRUCTING ATTACK LATTICES — METHODOLOGY
8.1 General Recipe
1. Express the cryptographic problem as:
"Find small x such that f(x) ≡ 0 (mod N)"
or "Find x close to target t in some lattice L"
2. Choose lattice type:
├─ Polynomial lattice → Coppersmith-style
├─ Modular lattice → HNP-style CVP
└─ Knapsack lattice → subset sum / CJLOSS
3. Determine dimensions:
└─ More dimensions = better approximation but slower
4. Set scaling factors:
└─ Balance the rows so short vector has roughly equal entries
└─ Common: multiply by N/X where X is the root bound
5. Apply reduction:
├─ LLL first (fast, usually sufficient)
└─ BKZ if LLL fails (increase block size: 20, 30, 40)
6. Extract solution:
└─ Check reduced basis rows for valid solutions8.2 Embedding Technique (CVP → SVP)
Transform CVP into SVP by embedding the target into the lattice:
# SageMath
def cvp_to_svp(basis_matrix, target, scale=1):
"""Convert CVP to SVP via Kannan's embedding."""
n = basis_matrix.nrows()
m = basis_matrix.ncols()
# Augment matrix
M = matrix(ZZ, n + 1, m + 1)
for i in range(n):
for j in range(m):
M[i, j] = basis_matrix[i, j]
M[i, m] = 0
for j in range(m):
M[n, j] = target[j]
M[n, m] = scale # scaling factor (try 1, then adjust)
L = M.LLL()
# Look for row with last entry = ±scale
for row in L:
if abs(row[m]) == scale:
return vector(target) - vector(row[:m]) * (row[m] // abs(row[m]))
return None8.3 Dimension Selection Guide
| Problem | Typical Dimension | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Coppersmith univariate (degree d) | d × m where m ≈ 1/ε | Larger m = smaller root bound |
| HNP with n signatures | n + 2 | n ≥ known_bits_ratio × q_bits |
| Knapsack with n weights | n + 1 or n + 2 | Depends on density |
| LCG with n outputs | n + 1 | More outputs = easier |
| Boneh-Durfee | (m+1)(m+2)/2 | m = parameter depth |
---
9. DECISION TREE
Lattice approach needed — which construction?
│
├─ RSA-related?
│ ├─ Small unknown part of message → Coppersmith univariate
│ │ └─ Check: unknown_bits < n_bits / e
│ ├─ Partial factor knowledge → Coppersmith mod p
│ │ └─ Use beta=0.5, X=2^unknown_bits
│ ├─ Small private exponent d → Boneh-Durfee
│ │ └─ Check: d < N^0.292
│ └─ Multiple related equations → multivariate Coppersmith
│
├─ DSA/ECDSA-related?
│ ├─ Reused nonce → direct algebraic recovery (no lattice needed)
│ ├─ Partial nonce leakage → HNP → CVP lattice
│ │ └─ Need enough signatures: n ≥ q_bits / leaked_bits
│ └─ Nonce bias → statistical HNP → larger lattice
│
├─ Knapsack / subset sum?
│ ├─ Low density (d < 0.9408) → CJLOSS lattice attack
│ ├─ High density → lattice attack unlikely to work
│ └─ Super-increasing → greedy algorithm (no lattice needed)
│
├─ LCG / PRNG?
│ ├─ Full outputs known → algebraic recovery (no lattice)
│ ├─ Truncated outputs → CVP on recurrence lattice
│ └─ Unknown modulus → use GCD of output differences
│
├─ NTRU?
│ └─ Build circulant lattice → LLL/BKZ for short key vector
│
└─ Custom problem?
├─ Express as "find small root of polynomial mod N" → Coppersmith
├─ Express as "find lattice point close to target" → CVP
├─ Express as "find short vector in lattice" → SVP / LLL
└─ If none fit → probably not a lattice problem---
10. COMMON PITFALLS
| Pitfall | Symptom | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Root bound too large | small_roots() returns empty | Reduce X, increase epsilon, verify bound satisfies Coppersmith criterion |
| Wrong scaling | LLL finds irrelevant short vector | Scale columns so target vector has balanced entries |
| Insufficient dimension | Solution not in reduced basis | Increase m parameter (more shift polynomials) |
| Wrong beta | Coppersmith doesn't find factor | beta=0.5 for half-size factor, beta=1.0 for full modulus |
| Too few signatures (HNP) | Lattice attack fails | Collect more signatures with nonce bias |
| BKZ block size too small | Solution not short enough | Increase block size (try 25, 30, 40) |
| Integer overflow | SageMath crashes | Use ZZ ring explicitly, avoid mixing QQ and ZZ |
Related skills
How it compares
Pick lattice-crypto-attacks over general crypto skills when the problem requires lattice reduction rather than modular arithmetic or brute-force key search.
FAQ
Who is Lattice Crypto Attacks for?
Developers and software engineers working with lattice-crypto-attacks patterns from the skill documentation.
When should I use Lattice Crypto Attacks?
>-
Is Lattice Crypto Attacks safe to install?
Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.