
Supabase Audit Auth Users
- 322 installs
- 60 repo stars
- Updated January 31, 2026
- yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills
supabase-audit-auth-users is an agent skill that tests Supabase authentication endpoints for user enumeration vulnerabilities by analyzing response patterns across signup and login routes.
About
supabase-audit-auth-users is an agent skill from yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills that audits Supabase authentication endpoints for user enumeration flaws. It probes whether valid email addresses can be inferred from differential responses on auth routes such as signup, login, and password recovery. The skill requires progressive file updates: write findings to .sb-pentest-context.json immediately after each endpoint test and log to .sb-pentest-audit.log before and after every probe so interrupted runs preserve evidence. Developers reach for this skill during security review of Supabase-backed applications before production launch or external pentest handoff. It fits teams validating that auth error messages, status codes, and timing do not leak account existence to attackers scanning email lists.
- Detects user enumeration vulnerabilities in Supabase auth
- Analyzes authentication endpoint response patterns
- Part of supabase-pentest-skills suite
- Progressive logging ensures no findings are lost
Supabase Audit Auth Users by the numbers
- 322 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +13 installs in the week ending Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #612 of 2,203 Security skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills --skill supabase-audit-auth-usersAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 322 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 60 |
| Last updated | January 31, 2026 |
| Repository | yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills ↗ |
How do you test Supabase auth for user enumeration?
Tests Supabase authentication endpoints for user enumeration vulnerabilities, detecting whether valid email addresses can be identified through response patterns.
Who is it for?
Developers security-testing Supabase Auth before production who need structured enumeration checks with progressive audit logging.
Skip if: Non-Supabase auth systems, general OWASP web scans, or post-launch production monitoring without a pentest context.
When should I use this skill?
The user wants to audit Supabase authentication for user enumeration or test whether auth endpoints leak valid emails.
What you get
.sb-pentest-context.json findings file, .sb-pentest-audit.log test log, and documented enumeration results per auth endpoint.
- .sb-pentest-context.json
- .sb-pentest-audit.log
- enumeration findings report
Files
User Enumeration Audit
🔴 CRITICAL: PROGRESSIVE FILE UPDATES REQUIRED
>
You MUST write to context files AS YOU GO, not just at the end.
- Write to .sb-pentest-context.json IMMEDIATELY after each endpoint tested- Log to .sb-pentest-audit.log BEFORE and AFTER each test- DO NOT wait until the skill completes to update files
- If the skill crashes or is interrupted, all prior findings must already be saved
>
This is not optional. Failure to write progressively is a critical error.
This skill tests for user enumeration vulnerabilities in authentication flows.
When to Use This Skill
- To check if user existence can be detected
- To test login, signup, and recovery flows for information leakage
- As part of authentication security audit
- Before production deployment
Prerequisites
- Supabase URL and anon key available
- Auth endpoints accessible
What is User Enumeration?
User enumeration occurs when an application reveals whether a user account exists through:
| Vector | Indicator |
|---|---|
| Different error messages | "User not found" vs "Wrong password" |
| Response timing | Fast for non-existent, slow for existing |
| Response codes | 404 vs 401 |
| Signup response | "Email already registered" |
Why It Matters
| Risk | Impact |
|---|---|
| Targeted attacks | Attackers know valid accounts |
| Phishing | Confirm targets have accounts |
| Credential stuffing | Reduce attack scope |
| Privacy | Reveal user presence |
Tests Performed
| Endpoint | Test Method |
|---|---|
/auth/v1/signup | Try registering existing email |
/auth/v1/token | Try login with various emails |
/auth/v1/recover | Try password reset |
/auth/v1/otp | Try OTP for various emails |
Usage
Basic Enumeration Test
Test for user enumeration vulnerabilitiesTest Specific Endpoint
Test login endpoint for user enumerationOutput Format
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
USER ENUMERATION AUDIT
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Project: abc123def.supabase.co
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Signup Endpoint (/auth/v1/signup)
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Test: POST with known existing email
Response for existing: "User already registered"
Response for new email: User object returned
Status: 🟠 P2 - ENUMERABLE
The response clearly indicates if an email is registered.
Exploitation:curl -X POST https://abc123def.supabase.co/auth/v1/signup \ -H "apikey: [anon-key]" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"email": "target@example.com", "password": "test123"}'
If user exists: {"msg": "User already registered"}
If new user: User created or confirmation needed
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Login Endpoint (/auth/v1/token)
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Test: POST with different email scenarios
Existing email, wrong password:
├── Response: {"error": "Invalid login credentials"}
├── Time: 245ms
└── Code: 400
Non-existing email:
├── Response: {"error": "Invalid login credentials"}
├── Time: 52ms ← Significantly faster!
└── Code: 400
Status: 🟠 P2 - ENUMERABLE VIA TIMING
Although the error message is the same, the response
time is noticeably different:
├── Existing user: ~200-300ms (password hashing)
└── Non-existing: ~50-100ms (no hash check)
Timing Attack PoC:import requests import time
def check_user(email): start = time.time() requests.post( 'https://abc123def.supabase.co/auth/v1/token', params={'grant_type': 'password'}, json={'email': email, 'password': 'wrong'}, headers={'apikey': '[anon-key]'} ) elapsed = time.time() - start return elapsed > 0.15 # Threshold
exists = check_user('target@example.com')
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Password Recovery (/auth/v1/recover)
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Test: POST recovery request for different emails
Existing email:
├── Response: {"message": "Password recovery email sent"}
├── Time: 1250ms (email actually sent)
└── Code: 200
Non-existing email:
├── Response: {"message": "Password recovery email sent"}
├── Time: 85ms ← Much faster (no email sent)
└── Code: 200
Status: 🟠 P2 - ENUMERABLE VIA TIMING
Same message, but timing reveals existence.
Existing users trigger actual email sending (~1s+).
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Magic Link / OTP (/auth/v1/otp)
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Test: Request OTP for different emails
Existing email:
├── Response: {"message": "OTP sent"}
├── Time: 1180ms
└── Code: 200
Non-existing email:
├── Response: {"error": "User not found"}
├── Time: 95ms
└── Code: 400
Status: 🔴 P1 - DIRECTLY ENUMERABLE
The error message explicitly states user doesn't exist.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Summary
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Endpoints Tested: 4
Enumerable: 4 (100%)
Vulnerability Severity:
├── 🔴 P1: OTP endpoint (explicit message)
├── 🟠 P2: Signup endpoint (explicit message)
├── 🟠 P2: Login endpoint (timing attack)
└── 🟠 P2: Recovery endpoint (timing attack)
Overall User Enumeration Risk: HIGH
An attacker can determine if any email address
has an account in your application.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Mitigation Recommendations
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1. CONSISTENT RESPONSES
Return identical messages for all scenarios:
"If an account exists, you will receive an email"
2. CONSISTENT TIMING
Add artificial delay to normalize response times:const MIN_RESPONSE_TIME = 1000; // 1 second const start = Date.now(); // ... perform auth operation ... const elapsed = Date.now() - start; await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, Math.max(0, MIN_RESPONSE_TIME - elapsed) )); return response;
3. RATE LIMITING
Already enabled: 3/hour per IP
Consider per-email rate limiting too.
4. CAPTCHA
Add CAPTCHA for repeated attempts:
- After 3 failed logins
- For password recovery
- For signup
5. MONITORING
Alert on enumeration patterns:
- Many requests with different emails
- Sequential email patterns (user1@, user2@, ...)
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════Timing Analysis
The skill measures response times to detect timing-based enumeration:
Existing user:
├── Password hash verification: ~200-300ms
├── Email sending: ~1000-2000ms
└── Database lookup: ~5-20ms
Non-existing user:
├── No hash verification: 0ms
├── No email sending: 0ms
└── Database lookup: ~5-20ms (not found)Threshold detection:
- Difference > 100ms: Possible timing leak
- Difference > 500ms: Definite timing leak
Context Output
{
"user_enumeration": {
"timestamp": "2025-01-31T13:30:00Z",
"endpoints_tested": 4,
"vulnerabilities": [
{
"endpoint": "/auth/v1/otp",
"severity": "P1",
"type": "explicit_message",
"existing_response": "OTP sent",
"missing_response": "User not found"
},
{
"endpoint": "/auth/v1/signup",
"severity": "P2",
"type": "explicit_message",
"existing_response": "User already registered",
"missing_response": "User created"
},
{
"endpoint": "/auth/v1/token",
"severity": "P2",
"type": "timing_attack",
"existing_time_ms": 245,
"missing_time_ms": 52
},
{
"endpoint": "/auth/v1/recover",
"severity": "P2",
"type": "timing_attack",
"existing_time_ms": 1250,
"missing_time_ms": 85
}
]
}
}Mitigation Code Examples
Consistent Response Time
// Edge Function with normalized timing
const MIN_RESPONSE_TIME = 1500; // 1.5 seconds
Deno.serve(async (req) => {
const start = Date.now();
try {
// Perform actual auth operation
const result = await handleAuth(req);
// Normalize response time
const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r,
Math.max(0, MIN_RESPONSE_TIME - elapsed)
));
return new Response(JSON.stringify(result));
} catch (error) {
// Same timing for errors
const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r,
Math.max(0, MIN_RESPONSE_TIME - elapsed)
));
// Generic error message
return new Response(JSON.stringify({
message: "Check your email if you have an account"
}));
}
});Generic Error Messages
// Don't reveal user existence
async function requestPasswordReset(email: string) {
// Always return success message
const response = {
message: "If an account with that email exists, " +
"you will receive a password reset link."
};
// Perform actual reset in background (don't await)
supabase.auth.resetPasswordForEmail(email).catch(() => {});
return response;
}MANDATORY: Progressive Context File Updates
⚠️ This skill MUST update tracking files PROGRESSIVELY during execution, NOT just at the end.
Critical Rule: Write As You Go
DO NOT batch all writes at the end. Instead:
1. Before testing each endpoint → Log the action to .sb-pentest-audit.log 2. After each timing measurement → Immediately update .sb-pentest-context.json 3. After each enumeration vector found → Log the finding immediately
This ensures that if the skill is interrupted, crashes, or times out, all findings up to that point are preserved.
Required Actions (Progressive)
1. Update `.sb-pentest-context.json` with results:
{
"user_enumeration": {
"timestamp": "...",
"endpoints_tested": 4,
"vulnerabilities": [ ... ]
}
}2. Log to `.sb-pentest-audit.log`:
[TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-auth-users] [START] Testing user enumeration
[TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-auth-users] [FINDING] P1: OTP endpoint enumerable
[TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-auth-users] [CONTEXT_UPDATED] .sb-pentest-context.json updated3. If files don't exist, create them before writing.
FAILURE TO UPDATE CONTEXT FILES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.
MANDATORY: Evidence Collection
📁 Evidence Directory: .sb-pentest-evidence/05-auth-audit/enumeration-tests/
Evidence Files to Create
| File | Content |
|---|---|
enumeration-tests/login-timing.json | Login endpoint timing analysis |
enumeration-tests/recovery-timing.json | Recovery endpoint timing |
enumeration-tests/otp-enumeration.json | OTP endpoint message analysis |
Evidence Format
{
"evidence_id": "AUTH-ENUM-001",
"timestamp": "2025-01-31T11:00:00Z",
"category": "auth-audit",
"type": "user_enumeration",
"tests": [
{
"endpoint": "/auth/v1/token",
"test_type": "timing_attack",
"severity": "P2",
"existing_user_test": {
"email": "[KNOWN_EXISTING]@example.com",
"response_time_ms": 245,
"response": {"error": "Invalid login credentials"}
},
"nonexisting_user_test": {
"email": "definitely-not-exists@example.com",
"response_time_ms": 52,
"response": {"error": "Invalid login credentials"}
},
"timing_difference_ms": 193,
"result": "ENUMERABLE",
"impact": "Can determine if email has account via timing"
},
{
"endpoint": "/auth/v1/otp",
"test_type": "explicit_message",
"severity": "P1",
"existing_user_response": {"message": "OTP sent"},
"nonexisting_user_response": {"error": "User not found"},
"result": "ENUMERABLE",
"impact": "Error message explicitly reveals user existence"
}
],
"curl_commands": [
"# Timing test - existing user\ntime curl -X POST '$URL/auth/v1/token?grant_type=password' -H 'apikey: $ANON_KEY' -d '{\"email\": \"existing@example.com\", \"password\": \"wrong\"}'",
"# Timing test - non-existing user\ntime curl -X POST '$URL/auth/v1/token?grant_type=password' -H 'apikey: $ANON_KEY' -d '{\"email\": \"nonexistent@example.com\", \"password\": \"wrong\"}'"
]
}Related Skills
supabase-audit-auth-config— Full auth configurationsupabase-audit-auth-signup— Signup flow testingsupabase-report— Include in final report
Related skills
How it compares
Use for Supabase-specific auth enumeration audits rather than generic OWASP application security review skills.
FAQ
What files does supabase-audit-auth-users write during testing?
supabase-audit-auth-users writes findings to .sb-pentest-context.json immediately after each endpoint test and logs activity to .sb-pentest-audit.log before and after every probe. Progressive writes ensure partial results survive interrupted runs.
What vulnerability does supabase-audit-auth-users detect?
supabase-audit-auth-users detects user enumeration where Supabase authentication endpoints reveal whether an email is registered through differing responses, status codes, or timing on signup, login, and recovery routes.