Now liveThe Skillselion MCP - thousands of ranked skills, loaded into your agent mid-task. No install.Get it →
yoanbernabeu avatar

Supabase Audit Auth Users

  • 322 installs
  • 60 repo stars
  • Updated January 31, 2026
  • yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills

supabase-audit-auth-users is an agent skill that tests Supabase authentication endpoints for user enumeration vulnerabilities by analyzing response patterns across signup and login routes.

About

supabase-audit-auth-users is an agent skill from yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills that audits Supabase authentication endpoints for user enumeration flaws. It probes whether valid email addresses can be inferred from differential responses on auth routes such as signup, login, and password recovery. The skill requires progressive file updates: write findings to .sb-pentest-context.json immediately after each endpoint test and log to .sb-pentest-audit.log before and after every probe so interrupted runs preserve evidence. Developers reach for this skill during security review of Supabase-backed applications before production launch or external pentest handoff. It fits teams validating that auth error messages, status codes, and timing do not leak account existence to attackers scanning email lists.

  • Detects user enumeration vulnerabilities in Supabase auth
  • Analyzes authentication endpoint response patterns
  • Part of supabase-pentest-skills suite
  • Progressive logging ensures no findings are lost

Supabase Audit Auth Users by the numbers

  • 322 all-time installs (skills.sh)
  • +13 installs in the week ending Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
  • Ranked #612 of 2,203 Security skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
  • Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills --skill supabase-audit-auth-users

Add your badge

Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.

Listed on Skillselion
Installs322
repo stars60
Last updatedJanuary 31, 2026
Repositoryyoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills

How do you test Supabase auth for user enumeration?

Tests Supabase authentication endpoints for user enumeration vulnerabilities, detecting whether valid email addresses can be identified through response patterns.

Who is it for?

Developers security-testing Supabase Auth before production who need structured enumeration checks with progressive audit logging.

Skip if: Non-Supabase auth systems, general OWASP web scans, or post-launch production monitoring without a pentest context.

When should I use this skill?

The user wants to audit Supabase authentication for user enumeration or test whether auth endpoints leak valid emails.

What you get

.sb-pentest-context.json findings file, .sb-pentest-audit.log test log, and documented enumeration results per auth endpoint.

  • .sb-pentest-context.json
  • .sb-pentest-audit.log
  • enumeration findings report

Files

SKILL.mdMarkdownGitHub ↗

User Enumeration Audit

🔴 CRITICAL: PROGRESSIVE FILE UPDATES REQUIRED

>

You MUST write to context files AS YOU GO, not just at the end.
- Write to .sb-pentest-context.json IMMEDIATELY after each endpoint tested
- Log to .sb-pentest-audit.log BEFORE and AFTER each test
- DO NOT wait until the skill completes to update files
- If the skill crashes or is interrupted, all prior findings must already be saved

>

This is not optional. Failure to write progressively is a critical error.

This skill tests for user enumeration vulnerabilities in authentication flows.

When to Use This Skill

  • To check if user existence can be detected
  • To test login, signup, and recovery flows for information leakage
  • As part of authentication security audit
  • Before production deployment

Prerequisites

  • Supabase URL and anon key available
  • Auth endpoints accessible

What is User Enumeration?

User enumeration occurs when an application reveals whether a user account exists through:

VectorIndicator
Different error messages"User not found" vs "Wrong password"
Response timingFast for non-existent, slow for existing
Response codes404 vs 401
Signup response"Email already registered"

Why It Matters

RiskImpact
Targeted attacksAttackers know valid accounts
PhishingConfirm targets have accounts
Credential stuffingReduce attack scope
PrivacyReveal user presence

Tests Performed

EndpointTest Method
/auth/v1/signupTry registering existing email
/auth/v1/tokenTry login with various emails
/auth/v1/recoverTry password reset
/auth/v1/otpTry OTP for various emails

Usage

Basic Enumeration Test

Test for user enumeration vulnerabilities

Test Specific Endpoint

Test login endpoint for user enumeration

Output Format

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
 USER ENUMERATION AUDIT
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

 Project: abc123def.supabase.co

 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Signup Endpoint (/auth/v1/signup)
 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

 Test: POST with known existing email
 Response for existing: "User already registered"
 Response for new email: User object returned

 Status: 🟠 P2 - ENUMERABLE

 The response clearly indicates if an email is registered.

 Exploitation:

curl -X POST https://abc123def.supabase.co/auth/v1/signup \ -H "apikey: [anon-key]" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"email": "target@example.com", "password": "test123"}'

If user exists: {"msg": "User already registered"}

If new user: User created or confirmation needed


 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Login Endpoint (/auth/v1/token)
 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

 Test: POST with different email scenarios

 Existing email, wrong password:
 ├── Response: {"error": "Invalid login credentials"}
 ├── Time: 245ms
 └── Code: 400

 Non-existing email:
 ├── Response: {"error": "Invalid login credentials"}
 ├── Time: 52ms ← Significantly faster!
 └── Code: 400

 Status: 🟠 P2 - ENUMERABLE VIA TIMING

 Although the error message is the same, the response
 time is noticeably different:
 ├── Existing user: ~200-300ms (password hashing)
 └── Non-existing: ~50-100ms (no hash check)

 Timing Attack PoC:

import requests import time

def check_user(email): start = time.time() requests.post( 'https://abc123def.supabase.co/auth/v1/token', params={'grant_type': 'password'}, json={'email': email, 'password': 'wrong'}, headers={'apikey': '[anon-key]'} ) elapsed = time.time() - start return elapsed > 0.15 # Threshold

exists = check_user('target@example.com')


 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Password Recovery (/auth/v1/recover)
 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

 Test: POST recovery request for different emails

 Existing email:
 ├── Response: {"message": "Password recovery email sent"}
 ├── Time: 1250ms (email actually sent)
 └── Code: 200

 Non-existing email:
 ├── Response: {"message": "Password recovery email sent"}
 ├── Time: 85ms ← Much faster (no email sent)
 └── Code: 200

 Status: 🟠 P2 - ENUMERABLE VIA TIMING

 Same message, but timing reveals existence.
 Existing users trigger actual email sending (~1s+).

 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Magic Link / OTP (/auth/v1/otp)
 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

 Test: Request OTP for different emails

 Existing email:
 ├── Response: {"message": "OTP sent"}
 ├── Time: 1180ms
 └── Code: 200

 Non-existing email:
 ├── Response: {"error": "User not found"}
 ├── Time: 95ms
 └── Code: 400

 Status: 🔴 P1 - DIRECTLY ENUMERABLE

 The error message explicitly states user doesn't exist.

 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Summary
 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

 Endpoints Tested: 4
 Enumerable: 4 (100%)

 Vulnerability Severity:
 ├── 🔴 P1: OTP endpoint (explicit message)
 ├── 🟠 P2: Signup endpoint (explicit message)
 ├── 🟠 P2: Login endpoint (timing attack)
 └── 🟠 P2: Recovery endpoint (timing attack)

 Overall User Enumeration Risk: HIGH

 An attacker can determine if any email address
 has an account in your application.

 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Mitigation Recommendations
 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

 1. CONSISTENT RESPONSES
    Return identical messages for all scenarios:
    "If an account exists, you will receive an email"

 2. CONSISTENT TIMING
    Add artificial delay to normalize response times:

const MIN_RESPONSE_TIME = 1000; // 1 second const start = Date.now(); // ... perform auth operation ... const elapsed = Date.now() - start; await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, Math.max(0, MIN_RESPONSE_TIME - elapsed) )); return response;


 3. RATE LIMITING
    Already enabled: 3/hour per IP
    Consider per-email rate limiting too.

 4. CAPTCHA
    Add CAPTCHA for repeated attempts:
    - After 3 failed logins
    - For password recovery
    - For signup

 5. MONITORING
    Alert on enumeration patterns:
    - Many requests with different emails
    - Sequential email patterns (user1@, user2@, ...)

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Timing Analysis

The skill measures response times to detect timing-based enumeration:

Existing user:
├── Password hash verification: ~200-300ms
├── Email sending: ~1000-2000ms
└── Database lookup: ~5-20ms

Non-existing user:
├── No hash verification: 0ms
├── No email sending: 0ms
└── Database lookup: ~5-20ms (not found)

Threshold detection:

  • Difference > 100ms: Possible timing leak
  • Difference > 500ms: Definite timing leak

Context Output

{
  "user_enumeration": {
    "timestamp": "2025-01-31T13:30:00Z",
    "endpoints_tested": 4,
    "vulnerabilities": [
      {
        "endpoint": "/auth/v1/otp",
        "severity": "P1",
        "type": "explicit_message",
        "existing_response": "OTP sent",
        "missing_response": "User not found"
      },
      {
        "endpoint": "/auth/v1/signup",
        "severity": "P2",
        "type": "explicit_message",
        "existing_response": "User already registered",
        "missing_response": "User created"
      },
      {
        "endpoint": "/auth/v1/token",
        "severity": "P2",
        "type": "timing_attack",
        "existing_time_ms": 245,
        "missing_time_ms": 52
      },
      {
        "endpoint": "/auth/v1/recover",
        "severity": "P2",
        "type": "timing_attack",
        "existing_time_ms": 1250,
        "missing_time_ms": 85
      }
    ]
  }
}

Mitigation Code Examples

Consistent Response Time

// Edge Function with normalized timing
const MIN_RESPONSE_TIME = 1500; // 1.5 seconds

Deno.serve(async (req) => {
  const start = Date.now();

  try {
    // Perform actual auth operation
    const result = await handleAuth(req);

    // Normalize response time
    const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r,
      Math.max(0, MIN_RESPONSE_TIME - elapsed)
    ));

    return new Response(JSON.stringify(result));
  } catch (error) {
    // Same timing for errors
    const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r,
      Math.max(0, MIN_RESPONSE_TIME - elapsed)
    ));

    // Generic error message
    return new Response(JSON.stringify({
      message: "Check your email if you have an account"
    }));
  }
});

Generic Error Messages

// Don't reveal user existence
async function requestPasswordReset(email: string) {
  // Always return success message
  const response = {
    message: "If an account with that email exists, " +
             "you will receive a password reset link."
  };

  // Perform actual reset in background (don't await)
  supabase.auth.resetPasswordForEmail(email).catch(() => {});

  return response;
}

MANDATORY: Progressive Context File Updates

⚠️ This skill MUST update tracking files PROGRESSIVELY during execution, NOT just at the end.

Critical Rule: Write As You Go

DO NOT batch all writes at the end. Instead:

1. Before testing each endpoint → Log the action to .sb-pentest-audit.log 2. After each timing measurement → Immediately update .sb-pentest-context.json 3. After each enumeration vector found → Log the finding immediately

This ensures that if the skill is interrupted, crashes, or times out, all findings up to that point are preserved.

Required Actions (Progressive)

1. Update `.sb-pentest-context.json` with results:

   {
     "user_enumeration": {
       "timestamp": "...",
       "endpoints_tested": 4,
       "vulnerabilities": [ ... ]
     }
   }

2. Log to `.sb-pentest-audit.log`:

   [TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-auth-users] [START] Testing user enumeration
   [TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-auth-users] [FINDING] P1: OTP endpoint enumerable
   [TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-auth-users] [CONTEXT_UPDATED] .sb-pentest-context.json updated

3. If files don't exist, create them before writing.

FAILURE TO UPDATE CONTEXT FILES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.

MANDATORY: Evidence Collection

📁 Evidence Directory: .sb-pentest-evidence/05-auth-audit/enumeration-tests/

Evidence Files to Create

FileContent
enumeration-tests/login-timing.jsonLogin endpoint timing analysis
enumeration-tests/recovery-timing.jsonRecovery endpoint timing
enumeration-tests/otp-enumeration.jsonOTP endpoint message analysis

Evidence Format

{
  "evidence_id": "AUTH-ENUM-001",
  "timestamp": "2025-01-31T11:00:00Z",
  "category": "auth-audit",
  "type": "user_enumeration",

  "tests": [
    {
      "endpoint": "/auth/v1/token",
      "test_type": "timing_attack",
      "severity": "P2",

      "existing_user_test": {
        "email": "[KNOWN_EXISTING]@example.com",
        "response_time_ms": 245,
        "response": {"error": "Invalid login credentials"}
      },

      "nonexisting_user_test": {
        "email": "definitely-not-exists@example.com",
        "response_time_ms": 52,
        "response": {"error": "Invalid login credentials"}
      },

      "timing_difference_ms": 193,
      "result": "ENUMERABLE",
      "impact": "Can determine if email has account via timing"
    },
    {
      "endpoint": "/auth/v1/otp",
      "test_type": "explicit_message",
      "severity": "P1",

      "existing_user_response": {"message": "OTP sent"},
      "nonexisting_user_response": {"error": "User not found"},

      "result": "ENUMERABLE",
      "impact": "Error message explicitly reveals user existence"
    }
  ],

  "curl_commands": [
    "# Timing test - existing user\ntime curl -X POST '$URL/auth/v1/token?grant_type=password' -H 'apikey: $ANON_KEY' -d '{\"email\": \"existing@example.com\", \"password\": \"wrong\"}'",
    "# Timing test - non-existing user\ntime curl -X POST '$URL/auth/v1/token?grant_type=password' -H 'apikey: $ANON_KEY' -d '{\"email\": \"nonexistent@example.com\", \"password\": \"wrong\"}'"
  ]
}

Related Skills

  • supabase-audit-auth-config — Full auth configuration
  • supabase-audit-auth-signup — Signup flow testing
  • supabase-report — Include in final report

Related skills

How it compares

Use for Supabase-specific auth enumeration audits rather than generic OWASP application security review skills.

FAQ

What files does supabase-audit-auth-users write during testing?

supabase-audit-auth-users writes findings to .sb-pentest-context.json immediately after each endpoint test and logs activity to .sb-pentest-audit.log before and after every probe. Progressive writes ensure partial results survive interrupted runs.

What vulnerability does supabase-audit-auth-users detect?

supabase-audit-auth-users detects user enumeration where Supabase authentication endpoints reveal whether an email is registered through differing responses, status codes, or timing on signup, login, and recovery routes.

Securityauditappsec

This week in AI coding

Five minutes, every Monday - the tools, releases and tactics for developers.

unsubscribe anytime.