
Supabase Report Compare
- 312 installs
- 60 repo stars
- Updated January 31, 2026
- yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills
supabase-report-compare is a security agent skill that compares two Supabase audit reports in Markdown format to track remediation progress, detect regressions, and measure security improvements over time.
About
supabase-report-compare is a Supabase security skill that diffs two Markdown audit reports from the same project to track remediation progress and identify regressions. Developers and security engineers run it after fixing vulnerabilities or during periodic reviews to verify that earlier findings were resolved and no new issues appeared. The skill expects two audit reports in Markdown format from the same Supabase project, accepting paths like old-report.md and new-report.md. Use supabase-report-compare when measuring security posture over time, validating a remediation sprint, or preparing evidence that vulnerabilities were addressed before shipping updates.
- Compares two Markdown audit reports side-by-side
- Tracks remediation of vulnerabilities over time
- Detects security regressions between audits
- Measures longitudinal security improvement
Supabase Report Compare by the numbers
- 312 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +13 installs in the week ending Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #624 of 2,203 Security skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Data as of Aug 5, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills --skill supabase-report-compareAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 312 |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 60 |
| Last updated | January 31, 2026 |
| Repository | yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills ↗ |
How do you compare Supabase security audit reports?
Compares two Supabase security audit reports side-by-side to track remediation progress, detect regressions, and measure security improvements over time.
Who is it for?
Security engineers running periodic Supabase audits who need evidence that remediation closed prior findings without introducing regressions.
Skip if: Teams without two prior Markdown audit reports from the same project or developers seeking initial vulnerability discovery rather than progress tracking.
When should I use this skill?
Two Supabase security audit Markdown reports exist and the developer needs remediation progress, regression detection, or posture comparison.
What you get
Side-by-side vulnerability diff, remediation status summary, and regression flags between two Markdown audit reports.
- remediation diff summary
- regression report
By the numbers
- Compares 2 Markdown security audit reports per run
Files
Report Comparison
This skill compares two security audit reports to track progress over time.
When to Use This Skill
- After fixing vulnerabilities, to verify remediation
- For periodic security reviews
- To track security posture over time
- To identify regression (new vulnerabilities)
Prerequisites
- Two audit reports in Markdown format
- Reports should be from the same project
Usage
Basic Comparison
Compare security reports old-report.md and new-report.mdWith Specific Paths
Compare reports/audit-v1.md with reports/audit-v2.mdOutput Format
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
SECURITY AUDIT COMPARISON
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Previous Audit: January 15, 2025
Current Audit: January 31, 2025
Days Between: 16 days
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Score Comparison
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Previous Score: 35/100 (Grade: D)
Current Score: 72/100 (Grade: C)
Improvement: +37 points ⬆️
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Score Progress │
│ │
│ 100 ┤ │
│ 80 ┤ ████████ 72 │
│ 60 ┤ ████████ │
│ 40 ┤ ████████ 35 ████████ │
│ 20 ┤ ████████ ████████ │
│ 0 ┴─────────────────────────────────────────────── │
│ Jan 15 Jan 31 │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Findings Summary
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
| Status | P0 | P1 | P2 | Total |
|-------------|-----|-----|-----|-------|
| Previous | 3 | 4 | 5 | 12 |
| Current | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Fixed | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| New | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Fixed Vulnerabilities ✅
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
P0 (Critical) - ALL FIXED! 🎉
✅ P0-001: Service Role Key Exposed
Status: FIXED
Resolution: Key rotated, removed from client code
Fixed on: January 16, 2025
✅ P0-002: Database Backups Publicly Accessible
Status: FIXED
Resolution: Bucket made private, files deleted
Fixed on: January 16, 2025
✅ P0-003: Admin Function Privilege Escalation
Status: FIXED
Resolution: Added admin role verification
Fixed on: January 17, 2025
P1 (High) - 2 of 4 Fixed
✅ P1-001: Email Confirmation Disabled
Status: FIXED
Resolution: Email confirmation now required
Fixed on: January 20, 2025
✅ P1-002: IDOR in get-user-data Function
Status: FIXED
Resolution: Added user ownership verification
Fixed on: January 18, 2025
P2 (Medium) - 2 of 5 Fixed
✅ P2-001: Weak Password Policy
Status: FIXED
Resolution: Minimum length increased to 10
Fixed on: January 22, 2025
✅ P2-003: Disposable Emails Accepted
Status: FIXED
Resolution: Email validation added
Fixed on: January 25, 2025
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Remaining Vulnerabilities ⚠️
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
P1 (High) - 2 Remaining
🟠 P1-003: User Enumeration via Timing Attack
Status: OPEN (16 days)
Priority: Address this week
Note: Was in previous report, not yet fixed
🟠 P1-004: Admin Channel Publicly Accessible
Status: OPEN (16 days)
Priority: Address this week
P2 (Medium) - 3 Remaining
🟡 P2-002: Wildcard CORS Origin
Status: OPEN (16 days)
🟡 P2-004: Verbose Error Messages
Status: OPEN (16 days)
🟡 P2-005: Rate Limiting Not Enforced on Functions
Status: OPEN (16 days)
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
New Vulnerabilities 🆕
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
P2 (Medium) - 1 New Issue
🆕 P2-006: New Storage Bucket Without RLS
Severity: 🟡 P2
Component: Storage
Description: New bucket 'user-uploads' created without
RLS policies. Currently empty but will
need policies before production use.
First Seen: January 31, 2025
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Progress Analysis
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Remediation Rate: 58% (7 of 12 fixed)
By Severity:
├── P0 (Critical): 100% fixed ✅
├── P1 (High): 50% fixed
└── P2 (Medium): 40% fixed
Time to Fix (Average):
├── P0: 1.3 days (excellent)
├── P1: 3.5 days (good)
└── P2: 5.5 days (acceptable)
Regression: 1 new issue introduced
(lower severity, acceptable)
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Recommendations
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1. CONTINUE PROGRESS
Great work fixing all P0 issues! Focus now on
remaining P1 issues:
- User enumeration timing attack
- Admin broadcast channel
2. ADDRESS NEW ISSUE
Configure RLS on 'user-uploads' bucket before
it's used in production.
3. SCHEDULE FOLLOW-UP
Recommend another audit in 14 days to verify
remaining fixes.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Trend Analysis
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
If you have 3+ reports, trend analysis is available:
| Date | Score | P0 | P1 | P2 | Total |
|------------|-------|----|----|----| ------|
| 2024-12-01 | 28 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 15 |
| 2025-01-15 | 35 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 12 |
| 2025-01-31 | 72 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Trend: Improving ⬆️
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════Comparison Logic
Finding Matching
Findings are matched between reports using:
1. ID match — Same P0-001, P1-002, etc. 2. Component + Title match — Same issue description 3. Location match — Same file/line/endpoint
Status Determination
| Previous | Current | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Present | Absent | Fixed ✅ |
| Present | Present | Remaining ⚠️ |
| Absent | Present | New 🆕 |
| Absent | Absent | N/A |
Score Calculation
Change = Current Score - Previous Score
Positive change = Improvement ⬆️
Negative change = Regression ⬇️
No change = Stable ➡️Context Output
{
"comparison": {
"previous_date": "2025-01-15",
"current_date": "2025-01-31",
"previous_score": 35,
"current_score": 72,
"score_change": 37,
"findings": {
"previous_total": 12,
"current_total": 6,
"fixed": 7,
"remaining": 5,
"new": 1
},
"by_severity": {
"P0": { "previous": 3, "current": 0, "fixed": 3, "new": 0 },
"P1": { "previous": 4, "current": 2, "fixed": 2, "new": 0 },
"P2": { "previous": 5, "current": 4, "fixed": 2, "new": 1 }
},
"remediation_rate": 0.58,
"trend": "improving"
}
}Report Output
The comparison generates supabase-audit-comparison.md:
# Security Audit Comparison Report
## Summary
| Metric | Previous | Current | Change |
|--------|----------|---------|--------|
| Score | 35/100 | 72/100 | +37 ⬆️ |
| P0 Issues | 3 | 0 | -3 ✅ |
| P1 Issues | 4 | 2 | -2 ✅ |
| P2 Issues | 5 | 4 | -1 ✅ |
| Total | 12 | 6 | -6 ✅ |
## Fixed Issues (7)
[Detailed list of fixed issues...]
## Remaining Issues (5)
[Detailed list of remaining issues...]
## New Issues (1)
[Detailed list of new issues...]
## Recommendations
[Action items based on comparison...]Multiple Report Comparison
For trend analysis across 3+ reports:
Compare trend across reports/audit-*.mdOutput includes:
- Score trend graph
- Issue count over time
- Average time to fix
- Recurring issues identification
Best Practices
Naming Convention
reports/
├── supabase-audit-2024-12-01.md
├── supabase-audit-2025-01-15.md
├── supabase-audit-2025-01-31.md
└── supabase-audit-comparison-2025-01-31.mdRegular Audits
| Frequency | Purpose |
|---|---|
| After fixes | Verify remediation |
| Monthly | Catch regressions |
| Before releases | Pre-production check |
| After incidents | Post-incident review |
Tracking Progress
1. Keep all reports in version control 2. Link to issue tracker (GitHub, Jira) 3. Include in sprint planning 4. Report to stakeholders
Related Skills
supabase-report— Generate the reports to comparesupabase-pentest— Run full auditsupabase-help— Quick reference
Related skills
How it compares
Use supabase-report-compare for audit-over-audit progress tracking rather than initial scanning when two prior Supabase reports already exist.
FAQ
What inputs does supabase-report-compare need?
supabase-report-compare requires two security audit reports in Markdown format from the same Supabase project. Provide paths such as old-report.md and new-report.md for side-by-side comparison.
When should teams run supabase-report-compare?
supabase-report-compare fits post-remediation verification, periodic security reviews, and regression checks. Run it after fixing vulnerabilities to confirm improvements and catch newly introduced issues.