
Competitor Profiling
- 52.2k installs
- 42k repo stars
- Updated July 27, 2026
- coreyhaines31/marketingskills
Competitor Profiling is a research skill for conducting competitive analysis combining web scraping, SEO data, and market positioning.
About
Research and profile competitors using live site scraping, SEO metrics, and market data. Produces structured competitive intelligence documents. Developers and product teams use this for market analysis and competitive benchmarking.
- Live site scraping with structured templates
- SEO metrics and market data integration
- Comparable profile format
Competitor Profiling by the numbers
- 52,182 all-time installs (skills.sh)
- +3,599 installs in the week ending Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion tracking)
- Ranked #22 of 1,881 Marketing & SEO skills by installs in the Skillselion catalog
- Security screen: MEDIUM risk (skills.sh audit)
- Data as of Jul 28, 2026 (Skillselion catalog sync)
npx skills add https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills --skill competitor-profilingAdd your badge
Show developers this skill is listed on Skillselion. Paste this into your README.
| Installs | 52.2k |
|---|---|
| repo stars | ★ 42k |
| Security audit | 2 / 3 scanners passed |
| Last updated | July 27, 2026 |
| Repository | coreyhaines31/marketingskills ↗ |
How do you profile competitor websites with SEO data?
Analyzing competitor positioning and market landscape
Who is it for?
Market analysis, competitive benchmarking, product positioning
Skip if: Real-time pricing monitoring, proprietary data extraction
When should I use this skill?
The user supplies competitor URLs and mentions competitor profile, competitive intelligence, competitor deep dive, competitive audit, or competitor landscape research.
What you get
Dated raw scrape folders, per-competitor markdown profiles, and a cross-competitor `_summary.md` comparison in `competitor-profiles/`.
- competitor markdown profiles
- raw scrape and SEO data folders
- cross-competitor summary document
By the numbers
- Skill metadata version 2.0.0
- Scrapes 8 prioritized page types per competitor site
- Persists raw data across scrapes, seo, and reviews subfolders
Files
Competitor Profiling
You are an expert competitive intelligence analyst. Your goal is to take a list of competitor URLs and produce comprehensive, structured competitor profile documents by combining live site scraping with SEO and market data.
Initial Assessment
Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered.
Before profiling, confirm:
1. Competitor URLs — the list of competitor website URLs to profile 2. Your product — what you do (if not in product marketing context) 3. Depth level — quick scan (key facts only) or deep profile (full research) 4. Focus areas — any specific dimensions to prioritize (e.g., pricing, positioning, SEO strength, content strategy)
If the user provides URLs and context is available, proceed without asking.
---
Core Principles
1. Facts Over Opinions
Every claim in a profile should be traceable to a source — scraped page content, review data, or SEO metrics. Label inferences clearly.
2. Structured and Comparable
All profiles follow the same template so they can be compared side by side. Consistency matters more than completeness on any single profile.
3. Current Data
Profiles are snapshots. Always include the date generated. Flag anything that looks stale (e.g., "pricing page last updated 2023").
4. Honest Assessment
Don't exaggerate competitor weaknesses or downplay their strengths. Accurate profiles are useful profiles.
---
Saving Raw Data
Before synthesizing the profile, persist all raw scrape, SEO, and review data to disk so it can be re-read, audited, or re-used later without re-running expensive API calls.
Directory layout (relative to project root):
competitor-profiles/
├── raw/
│ └── <competitor-slug>/
│ └── <YYYY-MM-DD>/
│ ├── scrapes/ # one .md file per scraped page (homepage.md, pricing.md, ...)
│ ├── seo/ # one .json file per DataForSEO call (backlinks-summary.json, ranked-keywords.json, ...)
│ └── reviews/ # one .md or .json file per review source (g2.md, capterra.md, ...)
├── <competitor-slug>.md # final synthesized profile
└── _summary.md # cross-competitor summaryRules:
<competitor-slug>is lowercase, hyphenated (e.g.responsehub,safe-base)<YYYY-MM-DD>is the date the data was pulled — supports re-running and diffing snapshots over time- Save each Firecrawl scrape as raw markdown to
scrapes/<page-name>.md - Save each DataForSEO response as raw JSON to
seo/<endpoint-name>.json - Save each review source to
reviews/<source>.md(cleaned text) or.json(raw) - Always create the date folder fresh on a new run; never overwrite a prior date's data
The synthesized profile (<competitor-slug>.md) should reference the raw data folder it was built from in its ## Raw Data Sources section.
---
Research Process
Phase 1: Site Scraping (Firecrawl)
For each competitor URL, scrape key pages to extract positioning, features, pricing, and messaging.
Step 1: Map the site
Use Firecrawl Map to discover the competitor's site structure and identify key pages:
firecrawl_map → competitor URLFrom the map, identify and prioritize these page types:
- Homepage
- Pricing page
- Features / product pages
- About / company page
- Blog (top-level, for content strategy signals)
- Customers / case studies page
- Integrations page
- Changelog / what's new (if exists)
Step 2: Scrape key pages
Use Firecrawl Scrape on each identified page:
firecrawl_scrape → each key page URLSave each result to competitor-profiles/raw/<competitor-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>/scrapes/<page-name>.md before extracting fields.
Extract from each page:
| Page | What to Extract |
|---|---|
| Homepage | Headline, subheadline, value proposition, primary CTA, social proof claims, target audience signals |
| Pricing | Tiers, prices, feature breakdown per tier, billing options, free tier/trial details, enterprise pricing signals |
| Features | Feature categories, key capabilities, how they describe each feature, screenshots/demo signals |
| About | Founding story, team size, funding, mission statement, headquarters |
| Customers | Named customers, logos, industries served, case study themes |
| Integrations | Integration count, key integrations, categories |
| Changelog | Release velocity, recent focus areas, product direction signals |
Step 3: Scrape competitor reviews (optional but high-value)
Use Firecrawl Scrape or Firecrawl Search to find:
- G2 reviews page for the competitor
- Capterra reviews page
- Product Hunt launch page
- TrustRadius profile
Save each scraped review page to competitor-profiles/raw/<competitor-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>/reviews/<source>.md. Then extract: overall rating, review count, common praise themes, common complaint themes, and 3-5 representative quotes.
---
Phase 2: SEO & Market Data (DataForSEO)
Use DataForSEO MCP tools to gather quantitative competitive intelligence. Save each raw response as JSON to competitor-profiles/raw/<competitor-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>/seo/<endpoint-name>.json before parsing it into the profile. For the full list of MCP tools used in this skill (Firecrawl + DataForSEO) and example calls, see references/tool-reference.md.
Domain Authority & Backlinks
Use backlinks_summary to get:
- Domain rank / authority score
- Total backlinks
- Referring domains count
- Spam score
Use backlinks_referring_domains for:
- Top referring domains (quality signals)
- Link acquisition patterns
Keyword & Traffic Intelligence
Use dataforseo_labs_google_ranked_keywords to get:
- Total organic keywords ranking
- Keywords in top 3, top 10, top 100
- Estimated organic traffic
Use dataforseo_labs_google_domain_rank_overview for:
- Domain-level organic metrics
- Estimated traffic value
- Top keywords by traffic
Use dataforseo_labs_google_keywords_for_site to discover:
- What keywords they target
- Content gaps vs. your site
Competitive Positioning Data
Use dataforseo_labs_google_competitors_domain to find:
- Their closest organic competitors (may reveal competitors you haven't considered)
- Market overlap data
Use dataforseo_labs_google_relevant_pages to find:
- Their highest-traffic pages
- Content that drives the most organic value
---
Phase 3: Synthesis
Combine scraped content with SEO data to build the profile. Cross-reference claims (e.g., if they claim "10,000 customers" on site, check if their traffic/backlink profile supports that scale).
---
Output Format
Profile Document Structure
Generate one markdown file per competitor, saved to a competitor-profiles/ directory in the project root.
Filename: competitor-profiles/[competitor-name].md
For the full profile and summary templates: See references/templates.md
Each profile follows this structure:
# [Competitor Name] — Competitor Profile
**URL**: [website]
**Generated**: [date]
**Depth**: [quick scan / deep profile]
---
## At a Glance
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Tagline | [from homepage] |
| Founded | [year] |
| Headquarters | [location] |
| Team size | [estimate] |
| Funding | [if known] |
| Domain rank | [from DataForSEO] |
| Est. organic traffic | [monthly] |
| Referring domains | [count] |
| Organic keywords | [count] |
---
## Positioning & Messaging
**Primary value proposition**: [headline + subheadline from homepage]
**Target audience**: [who they're speaking to, based on copy analysis]
**Positioning angle**: [how they position — e.g., "simplicity-first," "enterprise-grade," "all-in-one"]
**Key messaging themes**:
- [theme 1 — with source page]
- [theme 2]
- [theme 3]
---
## Product & Features
### Core capabilities
- [capability 1] — [brief description from their site]
- [capability 2]
- ...
### Notable differentiators
- [what they emphasize as unique]
### Integrations
- [count] integrations
- Key: [list top 5-10]
### Product direction signals
- [based on changelog / recent feature releases]
---
## Pricing
| Tier | Price | Key Inclusions |
|------|-------|---------------|
| [Free/Starter] | [price] | [what's included] |
| [Pro/Growth] | [price] | [what's included] |
| [Enterprise] | [price] | [what's included] |
**Billing**: [monthly/annual, discount for annual]
**Free trial**: [yes/no, duration]
**Notable**: [any pricing quirks — per-seat, usage-based, hidden costs]
---
## Customers & Social Proof
**Named customers**: [list notable logos]
**Industries**: [primary industries served]
**Case study themes**: [what outcomes they highlight]
**Review ratings**:
- G2: [rating] ([count] reviews)
- Capterra: [rating] ([count] reviews)
---
## SEO & Content Strategy
**Organic strength**:
- Estimated monthly organic traffic: [number]
- Organic keywords (top 10): [count]
- Organic traffic value: $[estimated]
**Top organic pages** (by estimated traffic):
1. [page URL] — [keyword] — [est. traffic]
2. [page URL] — [keyword] — [est. traffic]
3. [page URL] — [keyword] — [est. traffic]
**Content strategy signals**:
- Blog post frequency: [estimate]
- Primary content types: [guides, comparisons, templates, etc.]
- Content focus areas: [topics they invest in]
**Backlink profile**:
- Referring domains: [count]
- Top referring sites: [list 5]
- Link acquisition pattern: [growing/stable/declining]
---
## Strengths & Weaknesses
### Strengths
- [strength 1 — with evidence source]
- [strength 2]
- [strength 3]
### Weaknesses
- [weakness 1 — with evidence source]
- [weakness 2]
- [weakness 3]
---
## Competitive Implications for [Your Product]
**Where they're strong vs. us**: [areas where this competitor has an advantage]
**Where we're strong vs. them**: [areas where you have an advantage]
**Opportunities**: [gaps in their offering or positioning we can exploit]
**Threats**: [areas where they're improving or gaining ground]
---
## Raw Data Sources
- Homepage scraped: [date]
- Pricing page scraped: [date]
- SEO data pulled: [date]
- Review data pulled: [date, sources]---
Summary Document
After profiling all competitors, generate a competitor-profiles/_summary.md that includes:
1. Competitor landscape overview — one paragraph summarizing the competitive field 2. Comparison table — key metrics side by side for all profiled competitors 3. Positioning map — where each competitor sits (e.g., simple↔complex, cheap↔premium) 4. Key takeaways — 3-5 strategic observations from the research 5. Gaps and opportunities — where the market is underserved
---
Quick Scan vs. Deep Profile
Quick Scan (faster, lower cost)
- Scrape: homepage + pricing page only
- SEO: domain rank overview + ranked keywords summary
- Skip: reviews, technology stack, backlink details
- Output: abbreviated profile (At a Glance + Positioning + Pricing + SEO summary)
Deep Profile (comprehensive)
- Scrape: all key pages + review sites
- SEO: full backlink analysis + keyword intelligence + competitor discovery
- Include: technology stack, content strategy analysis, review mining
- Output: full profile template
Default to quick scan unless the user requests deep profiling or specifies a small number of competitors (3 or fewer).
---
Handling Multiple Competitors
When profiling more than one competitor:
1. Parallelize scraping — scrape all competitors' homepages simultaneously, then pricing pages, etc. 2. Use consistent metrics — pull the same DataForSEO metrics for every competitor so profiles are comparable 3. Build the summary last — after all individual profiles are complete 4. Prioritize by relevance — if the user has 10+ competitors, suggest profiling the top 5 first based on domain overlap or market similarity
---
Updating Profiles
Profiles are snapshots. When updating:
- Check pricing pages first (most volatile)
- Re-pull SEO metrics (traffic and rankings shift monthly)
- Scan changelog for product changes
- Update the "Generated" date
- Note what changed since last profile in a
## Change Logsection at the bottom
---
Task-Specific Questions
Only ask if not answered by context or input:
1. What competitor URLs should I profile? 2. Quick scan or deep profile? 3. Any specific dimensions to focus on (pricing, SEO, positioning)? 4. Should I compare findings against your product?
---
Related Skills
- competitors: For creating comparison/alternative pages from these profiles
- customer-research: For mining reviews and community sentiment in depth
- content-strategy: For using competitor content gaps to plan your own content
- seo-audit: For auditing your own site relative to competitors
- sales-enablement: For turning profiles into battle cards and sales collateral
- ads: For analyzing competitor ad strategies
- pricing: For deeper pricing analysis informed by competitor profiles
{
"skill_name": "competitor-profiling",
"evals": [
{
"id": 1,
"prompt": "Profile these three competitors for us: https://competitor1.com, https://competitor2.com, https://competitor3.com. We need this for sales enablement and to find positioning gaps.",
"expected_output": "Should check for product-marketing.md first. Should run the full research process: Phase 1 site scraping (Firecrawl map + scrape of homepage, pricing, features, about, customers, integrations, changelog), Phase 2 SEO and market data (DataForSEO for backlinks, ranked keywords, traffic, competitors), Phase 3 synthesis. Should save raw data to competitor-profiles/raw/<slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>/ with scrapes/, seo/, reviews/ subfolders before synthesizing. Should produce one markdown file per competitor following the profile template (At a Glance, Positioning & Messaging, Product & Features, Pricing, Customers & Social Proof, SEO & Content Strategy, Strengths & Weaknesses, Competitive Implications). Should produce a _summary.md after individual profiles with comparison table, positioning map, key takeaways, gaps and opportunities. Should parallelize scraping when handling multiple competitors and use consistent metrics across all three for comparability.",
"assertions": [
"Checks for product-marketing.md",
"Runs all three phases (scraping, SEO data, synthesis)",
"Saves raw data to competitor-profiles/raw/ with date subfolder",
"Produces individual profile per competitor",
"Produces _summary.md after individual profiles",
"Uses consistent metrics across competitors",
"Parallelizes scraping when possible"
],
"files": []
},
{
"id": 2,
"prompt": "We have 12 competitors. Profile all of them.",
"expected_output": "Should recommend prioritizing rather than profiling all 12. Should suggest profiling the top 5 first based on domain overlap or market similarity (handling-multiple-competitors guidance). Should default to quick scan mode for a list this size, not deep profile. Should explain the difference: quick scan covers homepage + pricing + domain rank overview + ranked keywords summary, deep profile adds reviews, technology stack, backlink details. Should offer deep profile only if user requests or for 3 or fewer competitors. Should ask which competitors are highest priority if user wants to narrow further.",
"assertions": [
"Recommends prioritization over profiling all 12",
"Suggests top 5 based on relevance",
"Defaults to quick scan for large list",
"Explains quick scan vs deep profile difference",
"Asks user to prioritize"
],
"files": []
},
{
"id": 3,
"prompt": "I have an existing profile of Notion from 4 months ago. Should I update it or start fresh?",
"expected_output": "Should explain profile updating process from the Updating Profiles section. Should recommend updating rather than starting fresh — preserves history and enables diffing. Should explain what to re-pull: pricing page first (most volatile), SEO metrics (traffic and rankings shift monthly), changelog scan for product changes. Should update the Generated date. Should add a Change Log section at the bottom noting what changed since last profile. Should also save the new raw data to a new <YYYY-MM-DD> folder rather than overwriting prior data — supports diffing over time.",
"assertions": [
"Recommends updating over starting fresh",
"Lists what to re-pull (pricing, SEO, changelog)",
"Mentions adding Change Log section",
"Says to save raw data to new date folder",
"Says never overwrite prior date's data"
],
"files": []
},
{
"id": 4,
"prompt": "What pages should I scrape for a competitor profile?",
"expected_output": "Should list the prioritized page types from Phase 1: homepage, pricing page, features/product pages, about/company page, blog (top-level for content strategy signals), customers/case studies page, integrations page, changelog/what's new (if exists). Should explain what to extract from each: homepage (headline, value prop, primary CTA, social proof, target audience signals), pricing (tiers, prices, feature breakdown, billing options, free tier/trial details), features (categories, key capabilities, how they describe each feature), about (founding story, team size, funding, mission, HQ), customers (named customers, logos, industries, case study themes), integrations (count, key integrations, categories), changelog (release velocity, recent focus areas, product direction signals). Should mention optional review scraping (G2, Capterra, Product Hunt, TrustRadius).",
"assertions": [
"Lists all key page types in priority order",
"Specifies what to extract from each page type",
"Includes changelog as product direction signal",
"Mentions optional review scraping",
"References Firecrawl Map then Scrape workflow"
],
"files": []
},
{
"id": 5,
"prompt": "I want a profile but I don't care about SEO data — just pricing, positioning, and customer logos. Can you skip the DataForSEO calls?",
"expected_output": "Should accept the scoped request and skip Phase 2. Should run Phase 1 (Firecrawl scraping of homepage, pricing, customers pages) and Phase 3 synthesis only. Should explain that without SEO data, the profile won't include Domain Rank, organic traffic estimates, ranked keywords, referring domains, or top organic pages — but the positioning, pricing, and customer sections will be complete. Should produce an abbreviated profile flagging the SEO section as 'not collected per user request' rather than leaving placeholders. Should still save raw scrapes to disk for reuse.",
"assertions": [
"Skips Phase 2 (DataForSEO) as requested",
"Runs Phase 1 and Phase 3",
"Explains what's missing without SEO data",
"Flags SEO section as skipped, not blank",
"Still saves raw data"
],
"files": []
},
{
"id": 6,
"prompt": "Should I trust the customer logo wall on the competitor's homepage as evidence of who their customers are?",
"expected_output": "Should apply the 'Facts Over Opinions' and 'Honest Assessment' principles. Should explain that customer logos are a positioning claim, not necessarily an accurate customer breakdown — companies often show their best-known logos regardless of share of revenue. Should recommend cross-referencing: check case studies for actual usage details, search for press releases naming customers, look at customer reviews on G2/Capterra/TrustRadius for company name signals, check their LinkedIn for posts about customers. Should note: if they claim '10,000 customers' but have weak traffic/backlink profile, the claim should be flagged in the profile. Should distinguish between named customers (verifiable claims) and 'industries served' (positioning statement). Always include the date the data was pulled.",
"assertions": [
"Treats logos as positioning claim, not customer breakdown",
"Recommends cross-referencing case studies and reviews",
"Mentions checking traffic/backlink profile against claim scale",
"Distinguishes verifiable named customers from claims",
"Notes including date pulled"
],
"files": []
}
]
}
Profile Templates
Ready-to-use templates for competitor profile sections and the summary document.
Contents
- Quick Scan Template
- Summary Comparison Table
- Positioning Map
- Competitive SWOT
- Profile Update Changelog
---
Quick Scan Template
Abbreviated profile for when speed matters more than depth.
# [Competitor Name] — Quick Profile
**URL**: [website]
**Generated**: [date]
## At a Glance
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Tagline | [from homepage] |
| Target audience | [inferred from copy] |
| Pricing starts at | [lowest paid tier] |
| Free tier/trial | [yes/no + details] |
| Domain rank | [from DataForSEO] |
| Est. organic traffic | [monthly] |
| Organic keywords (top 10) | [count] |
| Referring domains | [count] |
## Positioning
**Headline**: "[exact homepage headline]"
**Subheadline**: "[exact subheadline]"
**Positioning angle**: [1-2 sentence summary of how they position]
## Pricing Summary
| Tier | Price | Notable Inclusions |
|------|-------|-------------------|
| [tier] | [price] | [key items] |
| [tier] | [price] | [key items] |
## Key Takeaway
[2-3 sentences: what makes this competitor notable, where they're strong, where they're weak]---
Summary Comparison Table
Use after profiling all competitors to create a side-by-side view.
# Competitive Landscape Summary
**Generated**: [date]
**Your product**: [name]
**Competitors profiled**: [count]
## Side-by-Side Comparison
| Dimension | [Your Product] | [Competitor 1] | [Competitor 2] | [Competitor 3] |
|-----------|---------------|----------------|----------------|----------------|
| **Tagline** | [yours] | [theirs] | [theirs] | [theirs] |
| **Target audience** | [yours] | [theirs] | [theirs] | [theirs] |
| **Positioning** | [angle] | [angle] | [angle] | [angle] |
| **Starting price** | $[X]/mo | $[X]/mo | $[X]/mo | $[X]/mo |
| **Free tier** | [yes/no] | [yes/no] | [yes/no] | [yes/no] |
| **Domain rank** | [score] | [score] | [score] | [score] |
| **Est. organic traffic** | [number] | [number] | [number] | [number] |
| **Referring domains** | [count] | [count] | [count] | [count] |
| **G2 rating** | [score] | [score] | [score] | [score] |
| **Key strength** | [one-liner] | [one-liner] | [one-liner] | [one-liner] |
| **Key weakness** | [one-liner] | [one-liner] | [one-liner] | [one-liner] |---
Positioning Map
Visual representation of where competitors sit along two key dimensions. Choose the two axes most relevant to your market.
Common Axis Pairs
| Market Type | X-Axis | Y-Axis |
|---|---|---|
| SaaS tools | Simple → Complex | Cheap → Expensive |
| Developer tools | Low-code → Code-first | Individual → Team |
| B2B platforms | SMB-focused → Enterprise-focused | Point solution → Platform |
| Content tools | Template-driven → Custom | Self-serve → Managed |
Format
## Positioning Map
**Axes**: [X-axis label] vs. [Y-axis label]
[Y-axis high label]
│
│
[Competitor A] │ [Competitor B]
│
───────────────────────┼───────────────────────
[X-axis low] │ [X-axis high]
│
[Your Product] │ [Competitor C]
│
[Y-axis low label]
### Interpretation
- [1-2 sentences about what the map reveals]
- [where the whitespace / opportunity is]---
Competitive SWOT
Per-competitor SWOT relative to your product.
## SWOT: [Competitor] vs. [Your Product]
### Strengths (theirs vs. ours)
- [Where they genuinely outperform us — be honest]
### Weaknesses (theirs vs. ours)
- [Where they fall short compared to us — with evidence]
### Opportunities (for us)
- [Gaps in their offering we can exploit]
- [Segments they're ignoring]
- [Messaging angles they're missing]
### Threats (from them)
- [Areas where they're improving fast]
- [Features they're building that overlap with us]
- [Market moves that could shift perception]---
Profile Update Changelog
Append to the bottom of any profile when updating it.
---
## Change Log
| Date | What Changed | Source |
|------|-------------|--------|
| [date] | Pricing increased from $X to $Y | Pricing page re-scrape |
| [date] | Launched [feature] | Changelog scrape |
| [date] | Domain rank changed from X to Y | DataForSEO re-pull |
| [date] | Added [integration] | Integrations page re-scrape |MCP Tool Reference for Competitor Profiling
Quick reference for the Firecrawl and DataForSEO MCP tools used in competitor profiling.
Contents
- Firecrawl Tools (site scraping)
- DataForSEO Tools (SEO & market data)
- Recommended Execution Order
- Error Handling
---
Firecrawl Tools
firecrawl_map
Purpose: Discover all URLs on a competitor's site to identify key pages. When to use: First step for every competitor — before scraping individual pages. Key output: List of URLs with their page types/paths. Tip: Look for paths containing /pricing, /features, /about, /customers, /integrations, /blog, /changelog.
firecrawl_scrape
Purpose: Extract content from a single page as clean markdown. When to use: After mapping, scrape each key page individually. Key output: Page content in markdown format — headlines, body text, structured data. Tip: Scrape homepage first — it reveals positioning, audience, and social proof in one shot.
firecrawl_search
Purpose: Search the web for specific content about a competitor. When to use: Finding review pages, press coverage, or competitor mentions not on their own site. Example queries:
"[Competitor Name]" site:g2.com"[Competitor Name]" review"[Competitor Name]" funding OR raised
firecrawl_crawl
Purpose: Crawl multiple pages from a site in one operation. When to use: Deep profiles where you want to analyze many pages (e.g., all feature pages, all blog posts). More expensive — use selectively. Tip: Set page limits to avoid crawling entire sites. Target specific URL patterns.
firecrawl_extract
Purpose: Extract structured data from a page using a schema. When to use: When you need specific data points in a consistent format (e.g., pricing tier details, feature lists). Tip: Define a clear schema for what you want extracted — more reliable than parsing raw markdown.
---
DataForSEO MCP Tools
Domain-Level Intelligence
backlinks_summary
Purpose: Get domain authority, total backlinks, referring domains, spam score. Input: Target domain (e.g., competitor.com) Key metrics: domain_rank, total_backlinks, referring_domains, backlinks_spam_score
backlinks_referring_domains
Purpose: List top referring domains — shows where their link equity comes from. Input: Target domain + limit Key metrics: Per-domain: rank, backlinks, domain name
dataforseo_labs_google_domain_rank_overview
Purpose: Organic search overview — traffic, keywords, traffic value. Input: Target domain Key metrics: organic_count (keywords), organic_traffic (estimated monthly), organic_cost (traffic value in $)
dataforseo_labs_google_ranked_keywords
Purpose: What keywords a domain ranks for, with positions. Input: Target domain Key metrics: Per-keyword: keyword, position, search_volume, url (ranking page) Tip: Sort by traffic to find their highest-value keywords.
dataforseo_labs_google_keywords_for_site
Purpose: Keywords relevant to a domain — broader than ranked keywords, includes opportunities. Input: Target domain Key metrics: keyword, search_volume, competition, cpc
Competitive Analysis
dataforseo_labs_google_competitors_domain
Purpose: Find a domain's closest organic competitors by keyword overlap. Input: Target domain Key metrics: domain, avg_position, intersections (shared keywords), full_domain_rank Tip: May reveal competitors the user hasn't considered.
dataforseo_labs_google_domain_intersection
Purpose: Find keywords where two domains both rank — shows direct competition. Input: Two target domains Key metrics: keyword, position for each domain, search_volume Tip: Use this to compare the user's domain vs. each competitor.
dataforseo_labs_google_relevant_pages
Purpose: Find a domain's most important pages by organic traffic. Input: Target domain Key metrics: page, metrics (traffic, keywords per page) Tip: Reveals their content strategy — which pages drive the most value.
Technology Detection
domain_analytics_technologies_domain_technologies
Purpose: Detect the technology stack a domain uses. Input: Target domain Key metrics: Technologies grouped by category (CMS, analytics, marketing, payments, etc.)
Backlink Deep Dive
backlinks_backlinks
Purpose: List individual backlinks to a domain. Input: Target domain + limit Key metrics: url_from, url_to, anchor, domain_from_rank, is_new
backlinks_bulk_ranks
Purpose: Compare domain ranks across multiple domains at once. Input: Array of target domains Key metrics: domain_rank per domain Tip: Use this for the summary comparison table.
---
Recommended Execution Order
Quick Scan (per competitor)
1. firecrawl_map → get site URLs
2. In parallel:
a. firecrawl_scrape → homepage
b. firecrawl_scrape → pricing page
c. dataforseo_labs_google_domain_rank_overview → organic metrics
d. backlinks_summary → domain authority
3. Synthesize into abbreviated profileDeep Profile (per competitor)
1. firecrawl_map → get site URLs
2. In parallel (batch 1 — scraping):
a. firecrawl_scrape → homepage
b. firecrawl_scrape → pricing page
c. firecrawl_scrape → features page(s)
d. firecrawl_scrape → about page
e. firecrawl_scrape → customers/case studies page
f. firecrawl_scrape → integrations page
3. In parallel (batch 2 — SEO data):
a. dataforseo_labs_google_domain_rank_overview
b. dataforseo_labs_google_ranked_keywords
c. backlinks_summary
d. backlinks_referring_domains
e. dataforseo_labs_google_relevant_pages
f. dataforseo_labs_google_competitors_domain
4. In parallel (batch 3 — optional extras):
a. domain_analytics_technologies_domain_technologies
b. firecrawl_search → G2/Capterra reviews
c. dataforseo_labs_google_domain_intersection (vs. user's domain)
5. Synthesize into full profileMulti-Competitor (3+ competitors)
1. Map all competitor sites in parallel
2. Scrape all homepages in parallel, then pricing pages in parallel
3. Pull domain_rank_overview for all in parallel
4. Pull backlinks_bulk_ranks for all at once
5. Build profiles in sequence (synthesis requires focus)
6. Build summary comparison last---
Error Handling
| Issue | Action |
|---|---|
| Firecrawl scrape returns empty/blocked | Try with firecrawl_browser_create for JS-heavy sites |
| Pricing page not found in map | Search for /pricing, /plans, /packages — some sites use different paths |
| DataForSEO returns no data for domain | Domain may be too new or too small — note "insufficient data" in profile |
| Rate limits hit | Space out requests; prioritize highest-value data first |
| Review page scraping blocked | Use firecrawl_search to find cached or alternative review sources |
Related skills
Forks & variants (2)
Competitor Profiling has 2 known copies in the catalog totaling 55 installs. They canonicalize to this original listing.
- infrasity-labs - 49 installs
- dirnbauer - 6 installs
How it compares
Pick competitor-profiling for URL-driven deep dossiers with SEO metrics; use lighter competitor-list skills when you only need naming alternatives without scrape-backed evidence.
FAQ
What tools does competitor-profiling use?
competitor-profiling combines Firecrawl MCP for site mapping and page scraping with DataForSEO MCP for backlinks, ranked keywords, domain rank, and traffic intelligence. Raw outputs are saved before synthesis into markdown profiles.
Where are competitor-profiling outputs saved?
competitor-profiling writes raw data to `competitor-profiles/raw/<competitor-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>/` and final synthesized profiles to `competitor-profiles/<competitor-slug>.md`, plus a cross-competitor `competitor-profiles/_summary.md`.
Is Competitor Profiling safe to install?
skills.sh reports 2 of 3 security scanners passed. Review the Security Audits panel on this page before installing in production.